Phillip Capital
Five decades of Asia-Pacific market credibility paired with tight, near-zero spreads.
- Min deposit
- $0
- Max leverage
- 1:5
- Spread from
- 0 pips
- Regulators
- MAS, ASIC
Phillip Capital and Spreadex both offer commission-friendly access to global markets, but they differ sharply on regulation, spreads, and leverage. Our independent research gives Phillip Capital the overall edge, though Spreadex still holds appeal for specific trader profiles.
Five decades of Asia-Pacific market credibility paired with tight, near-zero spreads.
Higher leverage and zero commissions built for UK-based spread betting traders.
Same category, top-tier regulation, and it's currently accepting new traders.
See What Makes It DifferentCore features compared head-to-head.
| Feature | PC Phillip Capital | S Spreadex |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.7 / 5 | 3.4 / 5 |
| Founded | 1975 | 1999 |
| Headquarters | Singapore | St Albans, UK |
| Regulation | MAS, ASIC | FCA |
| Fees & Limits | ||
| Min Deposit | $0 | $0 |
| Spreads From | 0 pips | 0.6 pips |
| Commission | $0.08/lot | None |
| Max Leverage | 1:5 | 1:200 |
| Platforms & Markets | ||
| Trading Platforms | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile |
| Markets Offered | Stocks, Forex, Cfd, Indices, Commodities | Cfd, Forex, Stocks, Indices, Commodities |
Phillip Capital
$0
Spreadex
$0
Phillip Capital
0 pips
Spreadex
0.6 pips
Phillip Capital
$0.08/lot
Spreadex
None
Phillip Capital
None
Spreadex
None
Phillip Capital
None
Spreadex
None
Phillip Capital is the stronger all-around broker in this matchup, earning 3.7/5 on our rating system compared to Spreadex's 3.4/5. The gap is driven primarily by Phillip Capital's tighter spreads (from 0 pips vs 0.6 pips), its dual tier-1 regulatory licences from MAS and ASIC, and its longer 50-year operating history. Spreadex counters with higher maximum leverage (1:200 vs 1:5) and a zero-commission pricing model, which may appeal to short-term spread bettors in the UK, but for most traders seeking a well-rounded, lower-cost, and more heavily regulated broker, Phillip Capital is the recommended pick.
Regulatory strength is one of the widest gaps in this comparison. Phillip Capital is licensed by both the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) and Australia's ASIC, giving it two tier-1 regulatory approvals across two major financial jurisdictions.
Spreadex, by contrast, operates solely under the UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). While the FCA is itself a respected tier-1 regulator, holding only a single licence means Spreadex offers less jurisdictional diversification than Phillip Capital.
For traders who prioritize multi-region oversight and want the reassurance of being regulated in more than one major financial hub, Phillip Capital's dual-licence structure gives it a clear safety advantage in our assessment.
Pricing is where Phillip Capital pulls ahead most decisively. Its spreads start from 0 pips, compared to Spreadex's spreads from 0.6 pips, a meaningful difference for high-frequency or scalping-style traders.
Phillip Capital does charge a modest commission of $0.08 per lot, while Spreadex charges no commission at all, relying purely on its wider spread for revenue. This means active, high-volume traders may still come out ahead with Phillip Capital's tighter spread plus low flat commission, while casual traders placing fewer trades may find Spreadex's commission-free structure simpler.
Neither broker charges deposit or withdrawal fees, and both offer a $0 minimum deposit requirement, making entry-level accessibility a non-issue in this comparison. Overall, cost-conscious traders executing frequent trades will likely find better value with Phillip Capital's pricing model.
Spreadex offers considerably higher maximum leverage at 1:200, compared to Phillip Capital's more conservative 1:5 cap. This makes Spreadex more attractive to traders who want to amplify position sizes with smaller capital outlays, though higher leverage also carries elevated risk.
Both brokers provide access to a comparable spread of markets, including stocks, forex, CFDs, indices, and commodities, so neither broker holds a decisive advantage in overall market breadth.
Traders who value flexibility in leverage and are comfortable managing the associated risk may lean toward Spreadex, while risk-conscious traders may prefer Phillip Capital's more restrained leverage ceiling.
Both brokers rely on proprietary technology rather than third-party platforms like MetaTrader. Phillip Capital and Spreadex each support a Proprietary Web platform and a Proprietary Mobile app, so the platform ecosystems are functionally similar on paper.
Neither broker offers MT4, MT5, or cTrader integration in this comparison, which may be a limiting factor for traders who prefer industry-standard charting and automated trading tools.
Since platform offerings are largely matched, this category does not meaningfully separate the two brokers — the decision instead comes down to regulation, cost, and leverage preferences covered elsewhere in this review.
Phillip Capital has been operating since 1975, giving it more than five decades of market presence and making it the significantly more established of the two firms. It is headquartered in Singapore, positioning it firmly within the Asia-Pacific financial ecosystem.
Spreadex was founded in 1999 and is based in St Albans, UK. While younger than Phillip Capital, its 25+ year track record still reflects meaningful longevity in the competitive spread betting and CFD space.
Longevity alone doesn't guarantee superiority, but Phillip Capital's extended operating history combined with its dual regulatory licences reinforces a stronger overall reputation profile in our research.
Weighing all factors together, Phillip Capital earns the higher overall rating of 3.7/5 versus Spreadex's 3.4/5. The wins in regulatory breadth, tighter spreads, and longer operating history outweigh Spreadex's advantages in leverage and commission-free pricing.
Spreadex remains a credible option, particularly for UK-based traders who value FCA-only oversight, higher leverage, or a straightforward no-commission fee structure.
For the majority of traders — especially those focused on cost efficiency and regulatory diversification — Phillip Capital is the stronger choice and our recommended pick in this matchup.
The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.
Phillip Capital edges out Spreadex overall based on our expert rating score.
Highest Rated
Phillip Capital
3.7 / 5 / 5
Category winners
Overall winner
Based on overall expert rating (3.7/5).
Better for beginners
Stronger onboarding and educational resources.
Lower trading costs
More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.
Stronger regulation
Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.
Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Our #1 Pick Right Now: AvaTrade