AC
Aetos Capital
3.4 / 5Score: 4 / 5
Tighter spreads, dual tier-1 regulation, and a low $50 entry point make Aetos Capital the cost-efficient choice for active traders.
- Min deposit
- $50
- Max leverage
- 1:500
- Spread from
- 0 pips
- Regulators
- ASIC, FCA
Reviewed by Experts Updated 9/15/2026
Aetos Capital vs GO Markets: Which Broker Wins in 2026?
Aetos Capital and GO Markets are both ASIC-regulated brokers offering MT4/MT5 access to forex, indices, and crypto CFDs. Our research gives Aetos Capital the edge overall thanks to tighter spreads, a lower entry deposit, and dual tier-1 regulation, though GO Markets remains a credible alternative for beginners.
GM
GO Markets
3.3 / 5Score: 1 / 5
Nearly two decades of operating history give GO Markets a seasoned reputation for traders who value longevity.
- Min deposit
- $200
- Max leverage
- 1:500
- Spread from
- 0.1 pips
- Regulators
- ASIC, CySEC
Overall Winner
Aetos Capital
Best for Beginners
GO Markets
Lowest Fees
Aetos Capital
Top Regulation
Aetos Capital
Side-by-side comparison
Core features compared head-to-head.
| Feature | AC Aetos Capital | GM GO Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.4 / 5 | 3.3 / 5 |
| Founded | 2013 | 2006 |
| Headquarters | Sydney, Australia | Melbourne, Australia |
| Regulation | ASIC, FCA | ASIC, CySEC |
| Fees & Limits | ||
| Min Deposit | $50 | $200 |
| Spreads From | 0 pips | 0.1 pips |
| Commission | $3.5/lot | $3/lot |
| Max Leverage | 1:500 | 1:500 |
| Platforms & Markets | ||
| Trading Platforms | MT4, MT5 | MT4, MT5 |
| Markets Offered | Forex, Cfd, Indices, Commodities, Crypto | Forex, Cfd, Indices, Commodities, Crypto |
Trading & non-trading fees
Min Deposit
Aetos Capital
$50
GO Markets
$200
Spreads From
Aetos Capital
0 pips
GO Markets
0.1 pips
Commission
Aetos Capital
$3.5/lot
GO Markets
$3/lot
Deposit Fees
Aetos Capital
None
GO Markets
None
Withdrawal Fees
Aetos Capital
None
GO Markets
None
Pros & cons
AC
Aetos Capital
Pros
- Highest overall rating in this comparison at 3.4/5
- Extremely competitive spreads starting from 0.0 pips
- Low $50 minimum deposit lowers the barrier to entry
- Backed by two tier-1 regulators, ASIC and FCA
- No fees charged on deposits or withdrawals
- Full access to Forex, CFDs, indices, commodities, and crypto
- High leverage up to 1:500 for eligible traders
Cons
- Shorter operating history, founded in 2013 versus GO Markets's 2006
- Slightly higher commission at $3.5/lot versus GO Markets's $3/lot
- Newer brand may carry less long-term track record for ultra-conservative traders
GM
GO Markets
Pros
- Long-standing industry presence since 2006
- Slightly lower commission at $3 per lot
- Regulated under both ASIC and CySEC frameworks
- No deposit or withdrawal fees charged
- Full multi-asset market access matching competitors
- Supports both MT4 and MT5 platforms
Cons
- Wider spreads starting from 0.1 pips versus rivals' 0.0 pips
- Higher $200 minimum deposit limits accessibility for new traders
- Lower overall rating at 3.3/5 in our research
- Single non-tier-1 regulator (CySEC) alongside ASIC, versus dual tier-1 coverage elsewhere
Our expert verdict
Editor's verdict
Overall winner Aetos Capital
Lowest fees Aetos Capital
Best regulation Aetos Capital
Better for beginners GO Markets
Aetos Capital is the stronger all-around broker, earning a 3.4/5 on our proprietary rating scale versus 3.3/5 for GO Markets. The gap is driven primarily by Aetos Capital's tighter raw spreads (from 0.0 pips), lower $50 minimum deposit, and dual tier-1 regulatory coverage through ASIC and the FCA. GO Markets counters with a longer 20-year operating history and its own solid ASIC/CySEC licensing, making it a reasonable pick for beginners who value longevity, but Aetos Capital delivers the stronger overall package for cost-conscious and active traders.
Regulation & Trust
Both brokers operate under reputable regulatory umbrellas, but Aetos Capital edges ahead with dual tier-1 oversight from the ASIC and the FCA. This combination gives traders access to two of the world's most rigorous regulatory frameworks, each enforcing strict capital adequacy and client fund segregation rules.
GO Markets is regulated by ASIC and CySEC, a respectable pairing that still offers solid protections, though CySEC is generally viewed as a slightly lighter-touch regulator compared to the FCA. For traders who prioritize maximum regulatory redundancy, Aetos Capital's licensing structure provides an extra layer of confidence.
Neither broker charges deposit or withdrawal fees, which is a positive baseline for both platforms. However, the regulatory depth ultimately tips this category in Aetos Capital's favor.
Fees, Spreads & Commissions
Cost is where Aetos Capital pulls ahead most clearly. Spreads start from 0.0 pips compared to GO Markets's 0.1 pips, a meaningful difference for high-frequency traders and scalpers who rely on tight pricing to protect thin margins.
On commissions, GO Markets is marginally cheaper at $3 per lot versus Aetos Capital's $3.5 per lot. This slightly offsets the spread advantage for high-volume traders who execute large lot sizes, but the near-zero spread environment at Aetos Capital typically still results in a lower all-in cost per trade.
Both brokers maintain a clean fee structure with no deposit or withdrawal charges, which keeps account maintenance simple and predictable for traders on either platform.
Minimum Deposit & Accessibility
Aetos Capital is considerably more accessible to newer or smaller-capital traders, requiring just a $50 minimum deposit to open an account. This is a fraction of the $200 minimum required by GO Markets.
For traders testing strategies with limited capital, or those who prefer to scale into a broker relationship gradually, Aetos Capital's lower barrier to entry is a distinct practical advantage.
GO Markets's higher minimum may still be comfortable for most retail traders, but it does place it at a disadvantage for absolute beginners or those funding demo-to-live transitions with smaller amounts.
Trading Platforms & Market Access
Both brokers support the industry-standard MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 platforms, ensuring traders have access to familiar charting tools, Expert Advisors, and automated trading capabilities regardless of which broker they choose.
Market coverage is also identical on paper, with both brokers offering Forex, CFDs, indices, commodities, and crypto instruments. This parity means the platform decision often comes down to execution quality, spreads, and regulatory preference rather than instrument variety.
Leverage is matched as well, with both brokers offering up to 1:500 for eligible clients, giving similarly aggressive risk-management flexibility across both platforms.
Company Background & Track Record
GO Markets holds a notable edge in operating history, having been founded in 2006 in Melbourne, Australia, compared to Aetos Capital's founding in 2013 in Sydney. This roughly seven-year head start gives GO Markets a longer public track record.
Longevity can matter to conservative traders who weigh operational history heavily when assessing broker reliability, and GO Markets's near two-decade presence is a legitimate selling point.
That said, Aetos Capital's shorter history hasn't prevented it from securing stronger regulatory credentials and posting a higher overall rating, suggesting its newer infrastructure and pricing model have resonated well with the current trading community.
Our Verdict
Weighing cost, accessibility, and regulatory strength together, Aetos Capital comes out ahead with an overall rating of 3.4/5 versus 3.3/5 for GO Markets. The tighter spreads and lower minimum deposit make it especially attractive for cost-sensitive and newer traders.
GO Markets remains a fully credible alternative, particularly for traders who value its longer operating history or slightly lower commission rate on larger lot sizes.
Ultimately, both brokers are well-regulated and platform-equivalent, so the decision may come down to your capital size and fee sensitivity — factors where Aetos Capital currently holds the advantage.
Verdict summary
The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.
Editor's verdict
Aetos Capital wins overall
Aetos Capital edges out GO Markets overall based on our expert rating score.
AC
Highest Rated
Aetos Capital
3.4 / 5 / 5
Category winners
Overall winner
Based on overall expert rating (3.4/5).
Aetos CapitalBetter for beginners
Stronger onboarding and educational resources.
GO MarketsLower trading costs
More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.
Aetos CapitalStronger regulation
Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.
Aetos Capital
Frequently asked questions
According to our independent rating system, Aetos Capital scores higher overall at 3.4/5 compared to GO Markets's 3.3/5. Aetos Capital wins on spreads, minimum deposit, and regulatory depth, while GO Markets counters with a longer operating history. The best fit ultimately depends on your trading priorities — refer to our full verdict breakdown above for specifics.
Aetos Capital offers tighter spreads starting from 0.0 pips compared to GO Markets's 0.1 pips, though GO Markets charges a marginally lower commission of $3 per lot versus $3.5 per lot at Aetos Capital. For most traders, Aetos Capital's spread advantage results in lower overall costs per trade.
Aetos Capital requires a minimum deposit of just $50, making it significantly more accessible than GO Markets, which requires $200 to open an account. This makes Aetos Capital a better entry point for traders with limited starting capital.
Aetos Capital is regulated by the ASIC and the FCA, two tier-1 regulatory bodies known for stringent oversight. GO Markets is regulated by ASIC and CySEC. Both offer solid protection, but Aetos Capital's dual tier-1 licensing gives it a slight safety edge in our assessment.
Yes, both brokers support MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5, giving traders identical access to charting tools, automated trading via Expert Advisors, and familiar order execution workflows regardless of which broker they choose.
Yes, there is nothing preventing you from holding accounts at both brokers simultaneously. Many traders diversify across multiple platforms to compare execution quality, access different regulatory protections, or take advantage of differing fee structures for specific strategies.
GO Markets has the longer track record, having been founded in 2006 in Melbourne, Australia, compared to Aetos Capital's founding in 2013 in Sydney. This gives GO Markets roughly seven additional years of operating history in the retail trading industry.
Both brokers provide access to an identical range of asset classes, including Forex, CFDs, indices, commodities, and cryptocurrencies. Market variety is not a differentiator between these two brokers — the decision instead comes down to fees, regulation, and platform execution.
Both brokers offer maximum leverage of up to 1:500 for eligible clients, meaning leverage availability is not a distinguishing factor in this comparison. Traders should instead focus on spread costs and minimum deposit requirements when choosing between the two.
Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.