Choosing between Bitget and Stake comes down to what you actually trade — crypto derivatives with high leverage, or commission-free stocks with tighter regulatory protection. Our independent research scores Stake at 3.4/5 versus Bitget's 3.1/5, making Stake the stronger overall pick. Read on for the full breakdown of fees, regulation, platforms, and who each broker truly serves best.
Bitget is the go-to platform for crypto derivatives traders seeking high leverage up to 1:125 and powerful copy trading features in a MAS-regulated environment.
Stake delivers commission-free stock trading under dual ASIC and FCA regulation, making it the safest and most cost-efficient platform for retail equity investors.
Core features compared head-to-head.
| Feature | B Bitget | S Stake |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.1 / 5 | 3.4 / 5 |
| Founded | 2018 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Singapore | Sydney, Australia |
| Regulation | MAS | ASIC, FCA |
| Fees & Limits | ||
| Min Deposit | $0 | $0 |
| Spreads From | 0.1 pips | 0 pips |
| Commission | $0.06/lot | None |
| Max Leverage | 1:125 | 1:1 |
| Platforms & Markets | ||
| Trading Platforms | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile |
| Markets Offered | Crypto | Stocks |
Bitget
$0
Stake
$0
Bitget
0.1 pips
Stake
0 pips
Bitget
$0.06/lot
Stake
None
Bitget
None
Stake
None
Bitget
None
Stake
None
Stake wins this comparison overall, earning a 3.4/5 rating against Bitget's 3.1/5. Stake's zero-commission stock trading, tighter spreads starting from 0 pips, and dual regulation under ASIC and FCA make it the safer and more cost-efficient choice for most retail investors. Bitget remains a compelling option exclusively for crypto traders who need high leverage up to 1:125 and access to advanced derivative products, but its single MAS licence and narrower market coverage limit its appeal for the broader trading audience.
When evaluating any broker, regulatory oversight is the single most important factor for protecting your capital. Stake holds licences from two of the world's most respected financial regulators — the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and the UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). These dual licences mean Stake must adhere to strict client money segregation rules, maintain adequate capital reserves, and operate under robust consumer protection frameworks in both Australia and the United Kingdom.
Bitget, by contrast, is regulated solely by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS). While MAS is a credible and well-regarded regulator, holding only one licence from a single jurisdiction naturally provides a thinner safety net compared to Stake's dual-regulated structure. For traders who prioritise the security of their funds and the accountability that comes with multi-jurisdictional oversight, Stake has a clear and meaningful advantage here.
It is also worth noting that Stake's regulatory breadth reflects its focus on traditional stock markets, which are subject to some of the tightest global financial laws. Bitget, operating primarily in the crypto derivatives space, functions in a regulatory environment that is still evolving globally. This adds an additional layer of risk for traders who are particularly sensitive to regulatory uncertainty in the digital asset sector.
Our overall assessment places Stake decisively ahead in this category. Two top-tier licences versus one, combined with the inherent regulatory maturity of stock markets versus crypto derivatives, makes Stake the safer home for your trading capital.
Fees can silently erode your trading returns over time, so understanding the true cost of each platform is essential. Stake offers spreads starting from 0 pips with absolutely no per-trade commission charged to clients. This zero-commission model is particularly powerful for stock investors who make frequent trades or build diversified portfolios incrementally, as every saved dollar compounds into better long-term performance.
Bitget charges spreads from 0.1 pips and applies a commission of $0.06 per lot on its futures and derivatives products. While 0.1 pips is still a competitive starting spread in the crypto derivatives world, it does not match the 0-pip baseline that Stake advertises for stock trading. The per-lot commission on Bitget also means that high-frequency traders or those dealing in larger volumes will accumulate meaningful costs over time.
Neither broker charges deposit or withdrawal fees, which is a welcome feature shared across both platforms. This removes a common friction point that can frustrate traders when moving funds in and out of their accounts. However, it is important to recognise that the absence of deposit fees does not offset the ongoing trading costs that Bitget imposes through its spread and commission structure.
In the fees category, Stake wins clearly. Zero spreads and zero commission represent the gold standard for cost-conscious retail investors, and Stake delivers exactly that for stock traders.
The range of tradable assets a broker offers directly determines whether the platform can meet your investment strategy. Stake specialises in stock markets, giving clients access to equities listed on major exchanges. This focus on stocks makes Stake an ideal platform for investors who want straightforward exposure to publicly listed companies, whether in Australia, the US, or the UK, without the complexity of derivatives or leveraged products.
Bitget takes a completely different approach, concentrating exclusively on cryptocurrency markets. The platform supports a wide variety of crypto assets, including spot trading and an extensive range of crypto derivatives and futures contracts. For traders who believe in the long-term growth of digital assets or who want to actively trade crypto market volatility, Bitget's depth of crypto coverage is genuinely impressive.
The contrast here is stark — Stake does not offer crypto trading, and Bitget does not offer traditional stocks. This means the choice between the two is, in many ways, determined by your preferred asset class before any other factor is considered. If you want stocks, Stake is your only option between the two. If you want crypto derivatives, Bitget is the clear path.
Neither broker can be declared a universal winner in this category since they serve fundamentally different markets. However, for traders seeking regulated exposure to mainstream financial markets with broad global acceptance, Stake's stock-focused offering carries more institutional credibility and regulatory backing.
Leverage is a double-edged sword that can amplify both profits and losses, and the two brokers here take dramatically opposing positions on it. Bitget offers maximum leverage of up to 1:125 on its crypto derivatives products, which is an extremely high ratio that gives professional and experienced traders enormous capital efficiency. This level of leverage is specifically designed for sophisticated crypto traders who understand risk management and want to maximise their market exposure with minimal capital outlay.
Stake, on the other hand, operates with a maximum leverage of 1:1, meaning no leverage is offered at all. This is a deliberate design choice aligned with Stake's mission to serve retail stock investors who want straightforward, long-only equity exposure without the amplified risk that leverage introduces. For beginners and long-term investors, this is actually a protective feature rather than a limitation — it prevents the kind of catastrophic loss events that overleveraged retail traders frequently experience.
The trading conditions on both platforms are supported by proprietary web and mobile platforms, meaning neither broker relies on third-party software like MetaTrader 4 or 5. This gives each company full control over the user experience but also means traders who are accustomed to the advanced charting and automation tools of MT4/MT5 ecosystems will need to adapt to a different environment.
For professional crypto traders seeking high leverage and derivative complexity, Bitget wins this category outright. For conservative investors prioritising capital preservation and simplicity, Stake's no-leverage model is the right fit.
Both Bitget and Stake offer proprietary web and mobile platforms, but the user experience each delivers is shaped by the distinct audiences they serve. Stake's platform is clean, intuitive, and deliberately simplified to make stock investing accessible to beginners and intermediate traders alike. The interface prioritises ease of use, presenting portfolio data, market information, and order execution in a format that does not overwhelm newcomers to investing.
Bitget's platform is designed for crypto-native users who are comfortable navigating more complex trading interfaces. Features like copy trading — where users can automatically replicate the strategies of top-performing traders — add a social and educational dimension to the platform. Advanced order types, futures dashboards, and crypto market analytics are all integrated into the experience, making it genuinely powerful for active crypto traders.
On mobile, both brokers deliver capable applications that mirror the core functionality of their desktop counterparts. Mobile trading has become a baseline expectation for modern retail investors, and neither platform disappoints in this regard. However, the depth of Bitget's mobile tools for crypto derivatives management slightly edges out Stake's more streamlined mobile stock app in terms of raw feature count.
Overall, the platform experience winner depends entirely on your context. Beginners and stock investors will find Stake's cleaner interface far more approachable. Experienced crypto traders will appreciate Bitget's feature-rich environment, particularly its copy trading functionality, which has no equivalent on Stake.
After evaluating both platforms across regulation, fees, markets, leverage, and user experience, Stake emerges as the stronger broker overall with our rating of 3.4/5 compared to Bitget's 3.1/5. Stake's combination of zero-commission trading, dual ASIC and FCA regulation, and a beginner-friendly platform creates a compelling package that serves the widest range of retail investors with the highest degree of safety and cost efficiency.
Bitget is not a weak broker — it is simply a highly specialised one. Its value proposition is almost entirely targeted at crypto traders who need high leverage, derivative products, and copy trading functionality. Within that specific niche, it performs well and offers a credible, MAS-regulated environment for digital asset trading. But its narrow market focus, single regulatory licence, and per-lot commission structure prevent it from competing with Stake on a broader evaluation.
For beginners entering the investing world, Stake is the unambiguous recommendation. The no-leverage model, zero commissions, and strong regulatory framework create an environment where new investors can learn and grow without being exposed to disproportionate risk. For experienced crypto traders who specifically want leveraged derivatives exposure, Bitget is a legitimate and capable choice within its domain.
Ultimately, your asset class preference will be the decisive factor. If you want stocks — choose Stake. If you want crypto derivatives with high leverage — Bitget is your platform. For anyone seeking a single, well-rounded broker for mainstream investing, Stake is the clear winner of this comparison.
The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.
Stake edges out Bitget overall based on our expert rating score.
Highest Rated
Stake
3.4 / 5 / 5
Category winners
Overall winner
Based on overall expert rating (3.4/5).
Better for beginners
Stronger onboarding and educational resources.
Lower trading costs
More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.
Stronger regulation
Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.
Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
