Forex.com
Global regulatory strength meets commission-free, multi-asset trading flexibility.
- Min deposit
- $100
- Max leverage
- 1:200
- Spread from
- 0.8 pips
- Regulators
- FCA, CFTC, ASIC, MAS
Forex.com and CIMB Securities appeal to very different types of traders — one built for global regulatory strength, the other for ultra-low-cost local access. Our proprietary research puts Forex.com ahead overall, but CIMB Securities still has a strong case for cost-conscious beginners.
Global regulatory strength meets commission-free, multi-asset trading flexibility.
Zero minimum deposit and razor-thin spreads built for cost-conscious regional traders.
Core features compared head-to-head.
| Feature | F Forex.com | CS CIMB Securities |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.4 / 5 | 3.3 / 5 |
| Founded | 1999 | 1978 |
| Headquarters | Bedminster, USA | Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia |
| Regulation | FCA, CFTC, ASIC, MAS | SC, MAS |
| Fees & Limits | ||
| Min Deposit | $100 | $0 |
| Spreads From | 0.8 pips | 0 pips |
| Commission | None | $0.1/lot |
| Max Leverage | 1:200 | 1:5 |
| Platforms & Markets | ||
| Trading Platforms | MT4, MT5, Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile, iTrade |
| Markets Offered | Forex, Cfd, Stocks, Indices, Commodities, Crypto | Stocks, Etf, Indices, Forex |
Forex.com
$100
CIMB Securities
$0
Forex.com
0.8 pips
CIMB Securities
0 pips
Forex.com
None
CIMB Securities
$0.1/lot
Forex.com
None
CIMB Securities
None
Forex.com
None
CIMB Securities
None
Forex.com is our top pick in this matchup, earning a 4.4/5 on our rating scale compared to CIMB Securities's 3.3/5. Forex.com's four-tier regulatory coverage (FCA, CFTC, ASIC, MAS), wider platform choice, and broader market access make it the stronger all-around broker for most traders. CIMB Securities remains a compelling alternative for cost-sensitive beginners thanks to its $0 minimum deposit and tighter headline spreads, but its narrower regulatory footprint and limited leverage hold it back from the top spot.
Regulatory oversight is one of the sharpest differentiators in this comparison. Forex.com is licensed by four separate regulators — the FCA, CFTC, ASIC, and MAS — giving it coverage across the UK, US, Australia, and Singapore. This multi-jurisdictional footprint means Forex.com clients benefit from strict capital adequacy rules, segregated client funds, and access to established compensation schemes.
CIMB Securities, by contrast, is regulated by the SC (Securities Commission Malaysia) and MAS. While these are respected regional regulators, the overall coverage is narrower and more geographically concentrated, which may matter to traders who want globally recognized tier-1 oversight.
For traders who prioritize regulatory depth above all else, Forex.com is the clear winner here. CIMB Securities is still a legitimate, licensed option, particularly for traders based in Malaysia or Southeast Asia who value local regulatory familiarity.
On raw pricing, CIMB Securities technically undercuts Forex.com with spreads advertised from 0 pips, versus Forex.com's spreads from 0.8 pips. However, CIMB Securities charges a commission of $0.1 per lot, whereas Forex.com charges no per-trade commission at all.
This means the real-world cost comparison isn't as simple as headline spread numbers suggest. Active traders placing high lot volumes on CIMB Securities could see commission costs add up, while Forex.com's commission-free structure keeps costs more predictable for frequent traders.
Neither broker charges deposit or withdrawal fees, which is a welcome point of parity. Overall, CIMB Securities holds a slight edge for pure spread-focused scalpers, but Forex.com's zero-commission model may work out cheaper for many trading styles once total costs are factored in.
CIMB Securities is significantly more accessible for traders with limited starting capital, requiring a $0 minimum deposit. This makes it an attractive entry point for beginners who want to test the platform without committing meaningful funds upfront.
Forex.com requires a $100 minimum deposit, which is still relatively modest by industry standards but represents a real barrier compared to CIMB Securities's zero-deposit model.
Budget-conscious beginners or those wanting to dip a toe into trading before scaling up will likely appreciate CIMB Securities's lower barrier to entry, even if the broker trails in other areas like regulation and platform variety.
Forex.com supports MT4, MT5, a proprietary web platform, and a proprietary mobile app — giving traders access to the industry-standard MetaTrader ecosystem alongside its own in-house tools. This is a major advantage for traders who rely on custom indicators, expert advisors, or automated strategies built for MetaTrader.
CIMB Securities offers a proprietary web platform, a proprietary mobile app, and its own iTrade platform. While functional and suitable for straightforward stock and forex trading, it lacks the third-party ecosystem and algorithmic trading support that MetaTrader users expect.
For traders who value flexibility, automation, and a platform with wide community support, Forex.com is the stronger choice. CIMB Securities is more suited to traders who prefer simplified, broker-native interfaces without the added complexity of MetaTrader.
Forex.com offers leverage up to 1:200, considerably higher than CIMB Securities's maximum of 1:5. This gives Forex.com traders significantly more flexibility to control larger positions with smaller capital outlays, though this also comes with proportionally higher risk.
In terms of markets, Forex.com covers forex, CFDs, stocks, indices, commodities, and crypto — a genuinely diverse offering for multi-asset traders. CIMB Securities covers stocks, ETFs, indices, and forex, which is solid for equity-focused investors but lacks commodities and crypto exposure.
Traders looking for broad multi-asset diversification and higher leverage flexibility will find Forex.com the more capable platform, while CIMB Securities suits those focused primarily on regional equities and ETFs.
Forex.com is our recommended pick in this comparison, scoring 4.40/5 versus CIMB Securities's 3.29/5 on our proprietary rating system. Its stronger regulatory backing, commission-free pricing, wider platform selection, and higher leverage make it the more well-rounded choice for the majority of traders.
That said, CIMB Securities is not without merit — its $0 minimum deposit, tighter headline spreads, and long operating history since 1978 make it a sensible option for beginners or cost-conscious traders focused on regional markets.
Ultimately, your decision should hinge on your priorities: choose Forex.com for regulatory strength, platform flexibility, and multi-asset access, or CIMB Securities if a low-cost entry point and tight spreads matter most to your strategy.
The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.
Forex.com edges out CIMB Securities overall based on our expert rating score.
Highest Rated
Forex.com
4.4 / 5 / 5
Category winners
Overall winner
Based on overall expert rating (4.4/5).
Better for beginners
Stronger onboarding and educational resources.
Lower trading costs
More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.
Stronger regulation
Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.
Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.