ForTrade
Global multi-asset trading backed by triple-tier regulation and leverage up to 1:500.
- Min deposit
- $100
- Max leverage
- 1:500
- Spread from
- 1 pips
- Regulators
- FCA, ASIC, CySEC
ForTrade and OCBC Securities appeal to very different traders — one built for global multi-asset speculation, the other for Singapore-based stock and forex investors. Our research gives ForTrade the higher overall rating at 3.8/5, but OCBC Securities counters with tighter spreads and a $0 minimum deposit.
Global multi-asset trading backed by triple-tier regulation and leverage up to 1:500.
A MAS-regulated Singapore institution offering zero minimum deposit and razor-thin spreads.
Core features compared head-to-head.
| Feature | F ForTrade | OS OCBC Securities |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.8 / 5 | 3.3 / 5 |
| Founded | 2013 | 1986 |
| Headquarters | London, UK | Singapore |
| Regulation | FCA, ASIC, CySEC | MAS |
| Fees & Limits | ||
| Min Deposit | $100 | $0 |
| Spreads From | 1 pips | 0 pips |
| Commission | None | $0.18/lot |
| Max Leverage | 1:500 | 1:5 |
| Platforms & Markets | ||
| Trading Platforms | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile, MT4 | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile, iOCBC |
| Markets Offered | Forex, Cfd, Indices, Commodities, Stocks, Crypto | Stocks, Etf, Indices, Forex |
ForTrade
$100
OCBC Securities
$0
ForTrade
1 pips
OCBC Securities
0 pips
ForTrade
None
OCBC Securities
$0.18/lot
ForTrade
None
OCBC Securities
None
ForTrade
None
OCBC Securities
None
ForTrade is our top pick overall, earning 3.8/5 in our rating versus OCBC Securities's 3.3/5, thanks to its stronger multi-jurisdictional regulation (FCA, ASIC, CySEC) and broader access to leveraged CFD markets. OCBC Securities still wins on raw pricing, offering 0 pip spreads and no minimum deposit, making it a compelling option for cost-conscious beginners or those already banking with OCBC in Singapore. Ultimately, active multi-asset traders should lean ForTrade, while low-budget equity investors in Singapore may prefer OCBC Securities.
ForTrade is regulated across three tier-1 and tier-2 jurisdictions — the FCA in the UK, ASIC in Australia, and CySEC in Cyprus — giving it a genuinely global compliance footprint. This multi-licence structure means traders in several regions can be onboarded under strict segregated-funds and negative-balance-protection rules.
OCBC Securities, by contrast, operates under a single regulator: the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS). MAS is a highly respected regulator with a strong enforcement record, but the lack of additional overseas licences narrows OCBC Securities's regulatory diversification compared to ForTrade.
For traders who prioritize broad regulatory coverage and the ability to trade under multiple legal frameworks, ForTrade holds a clear structural advantage. However, Singapore-based investors who value a trusted, locally-supervised institution may see MAS regulation alone as sufficient.
Pricing is where OCBC Securities pulls ahead on paper. It advertises spreads from 0 pips, undercutting ForTrade's spread-from figure of 1 pip. However, OCBC Securities layers on a per-lot commission of $0.18, meaning your true cost depends heavily on trade size and frequency.
ForTrade takes the opposite approach: a slightly wider headline spread from 1 pip, but zero commission on trades. For high-frequency or smaller-lot traders, ForTrade's commission-free model can actually work out cheaper despite the nominal spread difference.
Neither broker charges deposit or withdrawal fees, which is a welcome point of parity. Overall, cost-conscious traders should model their expected trade volume before assuming OCBC Securities's tighter spread automatically means a cheaper total cost of trading.
OCBC Securities has zero minimum deposit requirement, making it exceptionally accessible to new investors or those wanting to test the platform with minimal capital exposure. This is a meaningful edge for beginners in Singapore who want to start small.
ForTrade requires a $100 minimum deposit — still modest by industry standards, but a real barrier compared to OCBC Securities's $0 threshold. For traders with very limited starting capital, this difference could be decisive.
That said, $100 is unlikely to be prohibitive for most retail traders seriously considering leveraged CFD trading, and it may better reflect the realistic capital needed to manage risk properly on ForTrade's higher-leverage offering.
ForTrade offers maximum leverage of 1:500, dramatically higher than OCBC Securities's 1:5 cap. This makes ForTrade far more suited to traders pursuing amplified exposure on forex, indices, commodities, and crypto CFDs.
Market breadth also favors ForTrade, which spans Forex, CFDs, Indices, Commodities, Stocks, and Crypto. OCBC Securities focuses more narrowly on Stocks, ETFs, Indices, and Forex — a lineup better suited to traditional equity investors than active derivatives traders.
OCBC Securities's lower leverage ceiling of 1:5 reflects its more conservative, equity-market-oriented positioning, likely shaped by MAS's retail leverage restrictions. This makes OCBC Securities inherently lower-risk, but also less flexible for traders seeking aggressive short-term speculation.
Both brokers offer proprietary web and mobile platforms, giving traders a consistent experience across devices. ForTrade rounds out its offering with MetaTrader 4 (MT4), a globally recognized platform prized for its charting tools, automated trading (EA) support, and broad third-party indicator ecosystem.
OCBC Securities instead offers its own iOCBC platform alongside its proprietary web and mobile apps. iOCBC is tailored specifically to Singapore equity and ETF investors, integrating smoothly with local settlement and banking infrastructure.
Traders who value the flexibility, automation, and familiarity of MT4 will find ForTrade's platform stack more powerful for active CFD and forex trading. Investors focused purely on Singapore-listed stocks may find iOCBC's localized design more convenient.
Weighing regulation, market access, leverage, and platform depth, ForTrade earns the higher overall rating in our research at 3.8/5, compared to OCBC Securities's 3.3/5. Its multi-jurisdictional licensing and broader multi-asset offering make it the stronger all-round pick for most active traders.
OCBC Securities remains a solid, low-cost entry point for beginners and Singapore-based equity investors, particularly those who value a $0 minimum deposit and tight headline spreads. Its narrower market range and lower leverage, however, limit its appeal for more active or diversified traders.
Ultimately, the right choice depends on your goals: choose ForTrade for global multi-asset CFD trading with stronger regulatory backing, or OCBC Securities if you're a cost-sensitive beginner focused on Singapore stocks and ETFs.
The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.
ForTrade edges out OCBC Securities overall based on our expert rating score.
Highest Rated
ForTrade
3.8 / 5 / 5
Category winners
Overall winner
Based on overall expert rating (3.8/5).
Better for beginners
Stronger onboarding and educational resources.
Lower trading costs
More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.
Stronger regulation
Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.
Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.