Fusion Markets
Zero minimum deposit and rock-bottom commissions make Fusion Markets the go-to choice for cost-conscious traders of every experience level.
- Min deposit
- $0
- Max leverage
- 1:500
- Spread from
- 0 pips
- Regulators
- ASIC
Fusion Markets and Aetos Capital are both ASIC-regulated brokers competing for cost-conscious traders, but only one comes out on top in our 2026 analysis. Fusion Markets edges ahead with a 3.6/5 rating versus 3.4/5, thanks to zero minimum deposit and broader platform support. Here's the full breakdown.
Zero minimum deposit and rock-bottom commissions make Fusion Markets the go-to choice for cost-conscious traders of every experience level.
Dual ASIC and FCA regulation gives Aetos Capital an edge for traders who prioritize broad regulatory oversight above all else.
Core features compared head-to-head.
| Feature | FM Fusion Markets | AC Aetos Capital |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.6 / 5 | 3.4 / 5 |
| Founded | 2017 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Melbourne, Australia | Sydney, Australia |
| Regulation | ASIC | ASIC, FCA |
| Fees & Limits | ||
| Min Deposit | $0 | $50 |
| Spreads From | 0 pips | 0 pips |
| Commission | $2.25/lot | $3.5/lot |
| Max Leverage | 1:500 | 1:500 |
| Platforms & Markets | ||
| Trading Platforms | MT4, MT5, TradingView | MT4, MT5 |
| Markets Offered | Forex, Cfd, Stocks, Indices, Commodities, Crypto | Forex, Cfd, Indices, Commodities, Crypto |
Fusion Markets
$0
Aetos Capital
$50
Fusion Markets
0 pips
Aetos Capital
0 pips
Fusion Markets
$2.25/lot
Aetos Capital
$3.5/lot
Fusion Markets
None
Aetos Capital
None
Fusion Markets
None
Aetos Capital
None
Fusion Markets is our recommended pick, scoring 3.6/5 versus Aetos Capital's 3.4/5 on our independent rating system. Fusion Markets wins on accessibility with a $0 minimum deposit and offers a wider range of markets and platforms, including TradingView integration. Aetos Capital counters with broader regulatory coverage across ASIC and FCA, making it appealing to traders who prioritize multi-jurisdictional oversight, but overall Fusion Markets delivers the stronger package for most traders.
Both brokers maintain ASIC regulation, giving traders a baseline of confidence around fund segregation and operational standards in Australia. Aetos Capital extends this further with an additional FCA licence, giving it broader regulatory coverage across two major jurisdictions.
Fusion Markets, while only holding a single ASIC licence, has built a solid reputation since its 2017 founding without any major regulatory red flags. For traders who prioritize multi-region oversight, Aetos Capital's dual licensing may offer added peace of mind.
That said, single strong-tier regulation from ASIC is still considered a robust standard globally, so Fusion Markets shouldn't be viewed as a compromise on safety, simply a narrower regulatory footprint.
Both brokers advertise spreads starting from 0 pips, putting them on equal footing at the headline level. The real differentiator emerges in commission structure: Fusion Markets charges $2.25 per lot, while Aetos Capital charges $3.5 per lot.
Over high-volume trading activity, this difference compounds meaningfully. A trader executing 100 lots per month would pay $225 with Fusion Markets versus $350 with Aetos Capital, a $125 monthly saving that adds up significantly over a year.
Neither broker charges deposit or withdrawal fees, which is a welcome standard shared across both platforms. Overall, Fusion Markets holds a clear cost advantage for active and high-frequency traders.
Fusion Markets requires no minimum deposit at all, making it exceptionally accessible for beginners or traders wanting to test the platform with minimal capital exposure. Aetos Capital requires a $50 minimum deposit, still a low bar by industry standards but a meaningful difference for entry-level traders.
This accessibility gap is one of the clearest wins for Fusion Markets in our comparison, particularly for newer traders who want to start small and scale up as confidence grows.
Fusion Markets supports MT4, MT5, and TradingView, giving traders three distinct platform choices depending on their charting and execution preferences. Aetos Capital supports only MT4 and MT5.
The inclusion of TradingView is a notable edge for Fusion Markets, as it's widely favored among modern traders for its intuitive charting interface and social trading community features. Traders who rely on advanced visual analysis tools may find Fusion Markets' platform lineup more future-proof.
Fusion Markets offers access to six market categories: Forex, CFDs, Stocks, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto. Aetos Capital covers five, omitting standalone Stocks from its offering.
For traders wanting a single account to access equities alongside forex and crypto, Fusion Markets provides a more complete one-stop solution.
Aetos Capital has the longer operating history, founded in 2013 and headquartered in Sydney, Australia, giving it nine years of additional market presence compared to Fusion Markets' 2017 founding in Melbourne. A longer track record can be reassuring for traders who weigh longevity heavily in their decision-making.
However, longevity alone doesn't outweigh Fusion Markets' advantages in cost structure, accessibility, and platform variety, which matter more for day-to-day trading experience.
The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.
Fusion Markets edges out Aetos Capital overall based on our expert rating score.
Highest Rated
Fusion Markets
3.6 / 5 / 5
Category winners
Overall winner
Based on overall expert rating (3.6/5).
Better for beginners
Stronger onboarding and educational resources.
Lower trading costs
More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.
Stronger regulation
Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.
Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.