LHV
LHV delivers institutional-grade tight spreads and multi-regulator trust from a stable, established Baltic banking heritage.
- Min deposit
- $0
- Max leverage
- 1:5
- Spread from
- 0 pips
- Regulators
- Finantsinspektsioon, FCA
LHV and Spreadex both earn a 3.4/5 rating, making this one of the tightest matchups in our broker comparison series. LHV pulls ahead on spreads and regulatory breadth, while Spreadex counters with higher leverage and a wider CFD market range.
LHV delivers institutional-grade tight spreads and multi-regulator trust from a stable, established Baltic banking heritage.
Spreadex combines high leverage flexibility with a broad multi-asset CFD offering under solid FCA oversight.
Core features compared head-to-head.
| Feature | L LHV | S Spreadex |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.4 / 5 | 3.4 / 5 |
| Founded | 1999 | 1999 |
| Headquarters | Tallinn, Estonia | St Albans, UK |
| Regulation | Finantsinspektsioon, FCA | FCA |
| Fees & Limits | ||
| Min Deposit | $0 | $0 |
| Spreads From | 0 pips | 0.6 pips |
| Commission | None | None |
| Max Leverage | 1:5 | 1:200 |
| Platforms & Markets | ||
| Trading Platforms | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile, LHV Broker | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile |
| Markets Offered | Stocks, Etf, Crypto, Indices | Cfd, Forex, Stocks, Indices, Commodities |
LHV
$0
Spreadex
$0
LHV
0 pips
Spreadex
0.6 pips
LHV
None
Spreadex
None
LHV
None
Spreadex
None
LHV
None
Spreadex
None
LHV edges out Spreadex overall with a marginal 3.36 vs 3.35 score, driven primarily by tighter spreads from 0 pips and dual tier-1 regulation. Spreadex remains a strong alternative for traders wanting higher leverage up to 1:200 and broader CFD, forex, and commodities access. Neither broker charges a commission, deposit fee, or withdrawal fee, so the decision ultimately hinges on your asset preferences and risk appetite.
LHV holds dual regulatory licensing from Finantsinspektsioon in Estonia and the UK's FCA, giving it two layers of tier-1 oversight. Spreadex, by contrast, operates under a single FCA licence, which is still a highly respected regulatory body but offers less redundancy.
For traders who prioritize regulatory diversification and want the added confidence of oversight from multiple jurisdictions, LHV holds a clear structural advantage. Spreadex's FCA-only status remains solid but narrower in scope.
Both brokers have operated since 1999, giving each over 25 years of market presence without major regulatory controversy, which speaks to long-term operational stability on both sides.
Cost is where LHV distinguishes itself most clearly, offering spreads starting from 0 pips with zero commission charges. Spreadex's spreads start at 0.6 pips, also commission-free, but the wider baseline spread means higher implicit trading costs over time.
Neither broker charges deposit or withdrawal fees, and both require a $0 minimum deposit, removing account funding as a differentiating factor. The real cost gap emerges purely in spread pricing during active trading.
For high-frequency or cost-sensitive traders, LHV's tighter spreads can translate into meaningful savings, particularly on larger position sizes or frequent trade execution.
Spreadex offers substantially higher leverage at up to 1:200, compared to LHV's conservative 1:5 cap. This makes Spreadex more appealing to traders who want amplified exposure on smaller account balances, though it also introduces greater risk.
Market breadth also favors Spreadex, which supports CFDs, Forex, Stocks, Indices, and Commodities across five categories. LHV covers Stocks, ETFs, Crypto, and Indices — a solid but narrower four-category offering focused more on longer-term investing than active CFD trading.
Traders focused on forex or commodities speculation will find Spreadex the only viable option between the two, since LHV does not offer either asset class.
LHV provides three platform options: a Proprietary Web platform, a Proprietary Mobile app, and the dedicated LHV Broker application, giving users more flexibility in how they manage trades. Spreadex offers two proprietary platforms — Web and Mobile — without a separate dedicated trading application.
Neither broker supports third-party platforms like MetaTrader 4/5 or cTrader, which may be a limitation for traders who prefer industry-standard charting and automation tools.
Overall, LHV's slightly larger platform lineup gives it a marginal usability edge, though both brokers maintain clean, functional proprietary interfaces suited to their respective target markets.
With scores of 3.36 for LHV and 3.35 for Spreadex, this comparison is remarkably close, and the right choice depends heavily on individual trading priorities. LHV is the stronger pick for cost-conscious, regulation-focused investors trading stocks, ETFs, or crypto.
Spreadex, meanwhile, suits traders who need higher leverage and broader CFD, forex, and commodities access despite a slightly wider spread. Both brokers charge no commission and have zero deposit or withdrawal fees, keeping the overall cost structure competitive on both sides.
Ultimately, LHV takes the marginal overall win in our rating due to its tighter spreads and dual regulation, but Spreadex remains a credible, well-regulated alternative for multi-asset CFD traders.
The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.
LHV edges out Spreadex overall based on our expert rating score.
Highest Rated
LHV
3.4 / 5 / 5
Category winners
Overall winner
Based on overall expert rating (3.4/5).
Better for beginners
Stronger onboarding and educational resources.
Lower trading costs
More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.
Stronger regulation
Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.
Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.