NAGA
NAGA delivers low-barrier, multi-asset trading with leverage up to 1:500 across six market categories.
- Min deposit
- $250
- Max leverage
- 1:500
- Spread from
- 0.7 pips
- Regulators
- CySEC
NAGA and Sarwa cater to different types of investors, but only one comes out on top in our independent rating. NAGA edges ahead overall with a 3.5/5 score versus Sarwa's 3.3/5, thanks to broader market access and a lower entry barrier. Here's exactly how they compare.
NAGA delivers low-barrier, multi-asset trading with leverage up to 1:500 across six market categories.
Sarwa combines tight spreads with dual regulatory oversight for investors focused on stocks, ETFs, and crypto.
Core features compared head-to-head.
| Feature | N NAGA | S Sarwa |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.5 / 5 | 3.3 / 5 |
| Founded | 2015 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Hamburg, Germany | Dubai, UAE |
| Regulation | CySEC | DFSA, SEC |
| Fees & Limits | ||
| Min Deposit | $250 | $500 |
| Spreads From | 0.7 pips | 0 pips |
| Commission | None | None |
| Max Leverage | 1:500 | 1:1 |
| Platforms & Markets | ||
| Trading Platforms | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile, MT4, MT5 | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile |
| Markets Offered | Stocks, Forex, Cfd, Crypto, Indices, Commodities | Etf, Stocks, Crypto |
NAGA
$250
Sarwa
$500
NAGA
0.7 pips
Sarwa
0 pips
NAGA
None
Sarwa
None
NAGA
None
Sarwa
None
NAGA
None
Sarwa
None
NAGA is our recommended pick in this comparison, scoring 3.53/5 versus Sarwa's 3.34/5 on our proprietary rating system. Sarwa offers comparable regulatory coverage and a fees advantage with 0.0 pip spreads, plus a broader regulatory footprint across DFSA and SEC. NAGA counters with a lower minimum deposit, higher leverage ceiling, and a wider range of tradable markets including forex and CFDs. Sarwa remains a solid option for traders who prioritise regulatory breadth across multiple jurisdictions and prefer a pure equities/ETF/crypto focus, but NAGA offers a stronger overall package for the majority of traders seeking flexibility, leverage, and platform variety.
Sarwa holds licences from the DFSA (Dubai Financial Services Authority) and the SEC (U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission), giving it a broader regulatory footprint across two well-respected jurisdictions.
NAGA, by comparison, is regulated solely by CySEC (Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission), a reputable EU-aligned regulator but a narrower single-license setup.
For traders who place a premium on multi-jurisdictional oversight and want the reassurance of a U.S.-recognised regulator, Sarwa has a clear edge here. That said, CySEC regulation still provides solid investor protections including negative balance protection and segregated client funds.
Sarwa is the cheaper option on raw spread cost, advertising spreads from 0 pips compared to NAGA's spreads from 0.7 pips. Neither broker charges a trading commission, and both waive deposit and withdrawal fees entirely.
On paper, this makes Sarwa the stronger choice for cost-conscious investors who trade frequently and want to minimise the spread drag on their returns, particularly in equities and ETFs.
However, NAGA's slightly wider spread is offset by its broader asset menu and higher leverage availability, which can matter more to active forex and CFD traders than raw spread size alone.
NAGA is considerably more accessible for newer or smaller-budget traders, requiring just a $250 minimum deposit versus Sarwa's $500 threshold.
This $250 gap can be meaningful for beginners still testing strategies or building confidence before committing larger capital.
Combined with its higher leverage ceiling of up to 1:500 (versus Sarwa's 1:1 unleveraged structure), NAGA is clearly positioned as the more beginner-friendly, flexible entry point of the two platforms.
NAGA supports a noticeably wider platform suite: Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile, MT4, and MT5. This gives traders the option to use industry-standard MetaTrader tools alongside NAGA's own interface.
Sarwa offers only its Proprietary Web and Proprietary Mobile apps, with no MT4/MT5 support, which may limit traders who rely on advanced charting, EAs, or third-party MetaTrader indicators.
On market range, NAGA again pulls ahead with six asset classes (Stocks, Forex, CFDs, Crypto, Indices, Commodities) versus Sarwa's three (ETFs, Stocks, Crypto). Sarwa's narrower focus suits long-term equity and ETF investors, while NAGA suits multi-asset traders wanting forex and derivatives exposure too.
NAGA was founded in 2015 and is headquartered in Hamburg, Germany, giving it a full decade of operating history in the retail trading space.
Sarwa was founded in 2017 and operates out of Dubai, UAE, positioning itself within the growing MENA region fintech and investment scene.
Both are relatively established players, though NAGA's slightly longer track record and European base may appeal to traders seeking a more mature, multi-asset brokerage experience.
Weighing all factors, NAGA earns the higher overall rating at 3.5/5 compared to Sarwa's 3.3/5, driven by its lower deposit requirement, wider market access, and greater platform flexibility.
Sarwa remains the better pick specifically for traders prioritising tight spreads and multi-jurisdictional regulatory coverage, particularly those focused on ETFs, stocks, and crypto rather than leveraged forex or CFD trading.
For most traders seeking an all-around, flexible, and accessible brokerage experience, NAGA is our recommended winner in this matchup.
The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.
NAGA edges out Sarwa overall based on our expert rating score.
Highest Rated
NAGA
3.5 / 5 / 5
Category winners
Overall winner
Based on overall expert rating (3.5/5).
Better for beginners
Stronger onboarding and educational resources.
Lower trading costs
More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.
Stronger regulation
Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.
Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.