OANDA
Nearly three decades of trust, backed by four-tier regulatory oversight and zero barrier to entry.
- Min deposit
- $0
- Max leverage
- 1:50
- Spread from
- 0.6 pips
- Regulators
- FCA, CFTC, ASIC, MAS
OANDA and FxPro both earn a strong 4.1/5 on our rating scale, making this one of the closest matchups we've reviewed. OANDA edges ahead on regulation and accessibility, while FxPro counters with higher leverage and broader platform choice.
Nearly three decades of trust, backed by four-tier regulatory oversight and zero barrier to entry.
Broader markets, higher leverage, and full MetaTrader flexibility for traders who want more room to maneuver.
Core features compared head-to-head.
| Feature | O OANDA | F FxPro |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.1 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 |
| Founded | 1996 | 2006 |
| Headquarters | New York, USA | London, UK |
| Regulation | FCA, CFTC, ASIC, MAS | FCA, CySEC, ASIC |
| Fees & Limits | ||
| Min Deposit | $0 | $100 |
| Spreads From | 0.6 pips | 0.6 pips |
| Commission | None | None |
| Max Leverage | 1:50 | 1:500 |
| Platforms & Markets | ||
| Trading Platforms | MT4, Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile | MT4, MT5, Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile |
| Markets Offered | Forex, Cfd, Indices, Commodities | Forex, Cfd, Stocks, Indices, Commodities |
OANDA
$0
FxPro
$100
OANDA
0.6 pips
FxPro
0.6 pips
OANDA
None
FxPro
None
OANDA
None
FxPro
None
OANDA
None
FxPro
None
OANDA is our recommended pick for most traders in 2026, thanks to its deeper regulatory coverage (FCA, CFTC, ASIC, MAS), zero minimum deposit, and long-standing track record dating back to 1996. FxPro remains a highly competitive alternative for traders who want MT5 support, higher leverage up to 1:500, and access to stocks alongside forex and CFDs. Both brokers charge no commission and offer spreads from 0.6 pips, so the decision ultimately comes down to your priorities around safety, capital requirements, and platform preference.
OANDA holds licences from four tier-1 and reputable regulators: the FCA, CFTC, ASIC, and MAS. This breadth of oversight spans the UK, US, Australia, and Singapore, giving traders in multiple jurisdictions strong recourse and confidence in fund segregation practices.
FxPro, by comparison, is regulated by the FCA, CySEC, and ASIC — three solid regulators, but notably missing the US-based CFTC oversight that OANDA carries. For traders who prioritize maximum regulatory redundancy, OANDA's four-license footprint gives it a clear edge in our assessment.
Neither broker has flagged deposit or withdrawal fees, which is a positive for both. However, when it comes purely to regulatory depth, OANDA scores higher due to its additional CFTC registration and longer 30-year operating history since 1996.
Both brokers advertise spreads starting from 0.6 pips on their core forex pairs, and neither charges a trading commission on standard accounts. This makes the raw cost of trading essentially comparable at the entry level.
Where the two diverge is capital access. OANDA requires no minimum deposit at all, making it exceptionally friendly for traders who want to start small or test the platform with limited capital. FxPro requires a $100 minimum deposit, a modest barrier but still a consideration for beginners.
Neither broker charges deposit or withdrawal fees, which keeps the overall cost structure clean and predictable for both platforms.
FxPro offers a broader platform suite, supporting MT4, MT5, a proprietary web platform, and a proprietary mobile app — four platform options in total. This gives traders more flexibility, particularly those who prefer MT5's enhanced charting and order types.
OANDA supports MT4 alongside its own proprietary web and mobile platforms, a solid three-platform offering, but it currently lacks native MT5 support, which may matter to traders who have built strategies around MT5-specific features.
For traders who value platform variety and are already comfortable with MetaTrader ecosystems, FxPro's inclusion of MT5 is a meaningful differentiator worth weighing against OANDA's regulatory strengths.
FxPro provides access to five market categories — forex, CFDs, stocks, indices, and commodities — giving traders a wider net to diversify beyond currency pairs. OANDA covers four categories: forex, CFDs, indices, and commodities, notably without direct stock trading.
Leverage is another area where FxPro pulls ahead numerically, offering up to 1:500 compared to OANDA's 1:50 cap. While higher leverage can amplify potential returns, it also significantly increases risk, so this advantage should be approached with caution rather than viewed as an outright benefit.
Traders who want to diversify into equities or who trade with a higher-leverage strategy may find FxPro's structure more accommodating, provided they manage risk appropriately.
OANDA's zero minimum deposit policy makes it one of the more accessible brokers for newcomers or those testing strategies with minimal capital at risk. Combined with its 1996 founding date, OANDA brings nearly three decades of operating history and institutional credibility.
FxPro, founded in 2006 and headquartered in London, is a well-established broker in its own right, though its $100 minimum deposit sets a slightly higher entry point compared to OANDA.
Both companies maintain a professional international presence, with OANDA based in New York and FxPro based in London, reflecting their respective regulatory home bases.
On balance, OANDA is the stronger all-round choice for most traders in 2026, driven primarily by its superior regulatory coverage and zero-deposit accessibility. Our proprietary scoring reflects this with OANDA capturing the head-to-head award in beginners, low fees, and regulation categories.
That said, FxPro remains genuinely competitive and is not a distant second. Traders who specifically want MT5 access, stock trading, or higher leverage ceilings may find FxPro better aligned with their needs, even though it trails on pure regulatory breadth.
Ultimately, both brokers scored an identical 4.1/5 on our rating scale, underscoring just how closely matched they are. Your final decision should hinge on which specific features — regulation, platform, or market access — matter most to your individual trading style.
The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.
OANDA edges out FxPro overall based on our expert rating score.
Highest Rated
OANDA
4.1 / 5 / 5
Category winners
Overall winner
Based on overall expert rating (4.1/5).
Better for beginners
Stronger onboarding and educational resources.
Lower trading costs
More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.
Stronger regulation
Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.
Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.