Brokers Profile
Reviewed by Experts Updated 9/6/2026

Stake vs GO Markets: Which Broker Wins in 2026?

Stake and GO Markets serve very different types of traders, but only one comes out on top in our 2026 rating. Stake edges ahead with tighter spreads, stronger tier-1 regulation, and a zero minimum deposit. GO Markets still holds appeal for active forex and CFD traders who need higher leverage and broader market access.

OVERALL WINNER
S

Stake

3.4 / 5Score: 5 / 5

Zero-commission stock investing with no minimum deposit and tier-1 regulatory backing.

Min deposit
$0
Max leverage
1:1
Spread from
0 pips
Regulators
ASIC, FCA
GM

GO Markets

3.3 / 5Score: 0 / 5

A veteran multi-asset broker offering high leverage and full MetaTrader access across five market categories.

Min deposit
$200
Max leverage
1:500
Spread from
0.1 pips
Regulators
ASIC, CySEC
Overall Winner
Stake
Best for Beginners
Stake
Lowest Fees
Stake
Top Regulation
Stake

Side-by-side comparison

Core features compared head-to-head.

Feature
S
Stake
GM
GO Markets
Overview
Rating3.4 / 53.3 / 5
Founded20172006
HeadquartersSydney, AustraliaMelbourne, Australia
RegulationASIC, FCAASIC, CySEC
Fees & Limits
Min Deposit$0$200
Spreads From0 pips0.1 pips
CommissionNone$3/lot
Max Leverage1:11:500
Platforms & Markets
Trading PlatformsProprietary Web, Proprietary MobileMT4, MT5
Markets OfferedStocksForex, Cfd, Indices, Commodities, Crypto

Trading & non-trading fees

Min Deposit

Stake

$0

GO Markets

$200

Spreads From

Stake

0 pips

GO Markets

0.1 pips

Commission

Stake

None

GO Markets

$3/lot

Deposit Fees

Stake

None

GO Markets

None

Withdrawal Fees

Stake

None

GO Markets

None

Pros & cons

S

Stake

Pros

  • Achieves the highest overall rating in this comparison at 3.4/5
  • Spreads start as low as 0 pips, undercutting many competitors
  • Charges no per-trade commission on stock transactions
  • No minimum deposit required, ideal for new investors
  • Backed by two respected tier-1 regulators, ASIC and FCA
  • No fees charged on deposits or withdrawals
  • Streamlined proprietary platforms designed for simplicity

Cons

  • Leverage capped at 1:1, meaning no margin trading available
  • Market access limited primarily to stocks
  • Lacks MT4/MT5 support for traders wanting advanced charting or EAs
  • Newer brand, founded in 2017, with less market history than GO Markets
  • No access to forex, commodities, or crypto CFDs
GM

GO Markets

Pros

  • Offers substantially higher leverage, up to 1:500
  • Broader market access spanning forex, CFDs, indices, commodities, and crypto
  • Longer operating history, established since 2006
  • Full MetaTrader 4 and 5 support for advanced trading and automation
  • No fees on deposits or withdrawals
  • Regulated by both ASIC and CySEC

Cons

  • Lower overall rating in our assessment at 3.3/5
  • Wider spreads starting from 0.1 pips versus Stake's 0 pips
  • Charges a $3 per lot commission on trades
  • Requires a $200 minimum deposit, a barrier for smaller accounts
  • CySEC regulation is generally viewed as less stringent than FCA

Our expert verdict

Editor's verdict

Overall winner Stake
Lowest fees Stake
Best regulation Stake
Better for beginners Stake

Stake is the overall winner in this matchup, scoring 3.4/5 on our proprietary rating system versus 3.3/5 for GO Markets. Stake's combination of tier-1 regulation from ASIC and FCA, zero-pip spreads, and a $0 minimum deposit makes it the more accessible and cost-efficient choice for most traders. GO Markets remains competitive for those who specifically want higher leverage, MT4/MT5 access, or a broader multi-asset offering including forex and crypto CFDs.

Regulation & Safety

Regulation is one of the clearest differentiators in this comparison. Stake is regulated by two respected tier-1 authorities, the ASIC in Australia and the FCA in the United Kingdom, giving it a strong dual-jurisdiction safety net.

GO Markets is also credible, holding licences from ASIC and CySEC. While CySEC is a recognized EU regulator, it is generally viewed as slightly less stringent than the FCA in terms of client fund protections and oversight.

For risk-conscious traders prioritizing regulatory pedigree, Stake's ASIC-FCA combination gives it a modest but meaningful edge in our overall safety assessment.

Fees, Spreads & Commissions

Cost efficiency clearly favors Stake in this matchup. Stake advertises spreads from 0 pips with no per-trade commission, resulting in a genuinely low-cost structure for stock trading.

GO Markets, by contrast, starts spreads at 0.1 pips and layers on a $3 per lot commission, which is standard for a raw-spread forex/CFD account but adds up for high-frequency traders.

Neither broker charges deposit or withdrawal fees, which is a positive on both sides. However, when it comes to pure trading cost, Stake's zero-commission model is the more transparent and beginner-friendly option.

Minimum Deposit & Accessibility

Stake requires no minimum deposit at all, making it exceptionally accessible for beginners or those wanting to test the platform with a small amount of capital.

GO Markets requires a $200 minimum deposit, a relatively standard figure in the forex/CFD brokerage space but still a real barrier compared to Stake's $0 threshold.

For newer traders or those building capital gradually, Stake's zero-deposit accessibility is a significant practical advantage.

Trading Platforms & Tools

Stake operates on proprietary web and mobile platforms built specifically for stock investing, offering a clean, modern interface tailored to equity traders.

GO Markets instead relies on the industry-standard MT4 and MT5 platforms, which are packed with advanced charting, automated trading (EAs), and a huge library of third-party indicators.

Traders who value customization, algorithmic trading, or familiarity with MetaTrader will likely prefer GO Markets, while those who want a streamlined stock-trading experience will lean toward Stake.

Market Access & Leverage

GO Markets offers a substantially broader market selection, covering forex, CFDs, indices, commodities, and crypto, alongside leverage up to 1:500 for eligible accounts.

Stake, in contrast, is focused primarily on stocks, with leverage capped at 1:1, meaning no leveraged trading is available.

This makes GO Markets the clear choice for multi-asset traders and those who want to use leverage, while Stake suits investors focused specifically on direct stock ownership.

Our Verdict

Weighing all factors together, Stake earns the higher overall rating of 3.4/5 compared to GO Markets's 3.3/5, driven largely by its stronger regulatory profile, lower costs, and zero minimum deposit.

That said, this is not a knockout victory. GO Markets remains a strong, more established option (founded in 2006 vs. 2017) for traders who need forex, CFD, and crypto access with higher leverage and MetaTrader platforms.

Our recommendation: choose Stake if you're a beginner-focused stock investor prioritizing low costs and simplicity; choose GO Markets if you're an active multi-asset trader who needs leverage and broader market access.

Verdict summary

The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.

Editor's verdict

Stake wins overall

Stake edges out GO Markets overall based on our expert rating score.

S

Highest Rated

Stake

3.4 / 5 / 5

Category winners

  • Overall winner

    Based on overall expert rating (3.4/5).

    Stake
  • Better for beginners

    Stronger onboarding and educational resources.

    Stake
  • Lower trading costs

    More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.

    Stake
  • Stronger regulation

    Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.

    Stake

Frequently asked questions

Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

BP AI