Stake
Zero-commission stock investing with no minimum deposit and tier-1 regulatory backing.
- Min deposit
- $0
- Max leverage
- 1:1
- Spread from
- 0 pips
- Regulators
- ASIC, FCA
Stake and GO Markets serve very different types of traders, but only one comes out on top in our 2026 rating. Stake edges ahead with tighter spreads, stronger tier-1 regulation, and a zero minimum deposit. GO Markets still holds appeal for active forex and CFD traders who need higher leverage and broader market access.
Zero-commission stock investing with no minimum deposit and tier-1 regulatory backing.
A veteran multi-asset broker offering high leverage and full MetaTrader access across five market categories.
Core features compared head-to-head.
| Feature | S Stake | GM GO Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.4 / 5 | 3.3 / 5 |
| Founded | 2017 | 2006 |
| Headquarters | Sydney, Australia | Melbourne, Australia |
| Regulation | ASIC, FCA | ASIC, CySEC |
| Fees & Limits | ||
| Min Deposit | $0 | $200 |
| Spreads From | 0 pips | 0.1 pips |
| Commission | None | $3/lot |
| Max Leverage | 1:1 | 1:500 |
| Platforms & Markets | ||
| Trading Platforms | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile | MT4, MT5 |
| Markets Offered | Stocks | Forex, Cfd, Indices, Commodities, Crypto |
Stake
$0
GO Markets
$200
Stake
0 pips
GO Markets
0.1 pips
Stake
None
GO Markets
$3/lot
Stake
None
GO Markets
None
Stake
None
GO Markets
None
Stake is the overall winner in this matchup, scoring 3.4/5 on our proprietary rating system versus 3.3/5 for GO Markets. Stake's combination of tier-1 regulation from ASIC and FCA, zero-pip spreads, and a $0 minimum deposit makes it the more accessible and cost-efficient choice for most traders. GO Markets remains competitive for those who specifically want higher leverage, MT4/MT5 access, or a broader multi-asset offering including forex and crypto CFDs.
Regulation is one of the clearest differentiators in this comparison. Stake is regulated by two respected tier-1 authorities, the ASIC in Australia and the FCA in the United Kingdom, giving it a strong dual-jurisdiction safety net.
GO Markets is also credible, holding licences from ASIC and CySEC. While CySEC is a recognized EU regulator, it is generally viewed as slightly less stringent than the FCA in terms of client fund protections and oversight.
For risk-conscious traders prioritizing regulatory pedigree, Stake's ASIC-FCA combination gives it a modest but meaningful edge in our overall safety assessment.
Cost efficiency clearly favors Stake in this matchup. Stake advertises spreads from 0 pips with no per-trade commission, resulting in a genuinely low-cost structure for stock trading.
GO Markets, by contrast, starts spreads at 0.1 pips and layers on a $3 per lot commission, which is standard for a raw-spread forex/CFD account but adds up for high-frequency traders.
Neither broker charges deposit or withdrawal fees, which is a positive on both sides. However, when it comes to pure trading cost, Stake's zero-commission model is the more transparent and beginner-friendly option.
Stake requires no minimum deposit at all, making it exceptionally accessible for beginners or those wanting to test the platform with a small amount of capital.
GO Markets requires a $200 minimum deposit, a relatively standard figure in the forex/CFD brokerage space but still a real barrier compared to Stake's $0 threshold.
For newer traders or those building capital gradually, Stake's zero-deposit accessibility is a significant practical advantage.
Stake operates on proprietary web and mobile platforms built specifically for stock investing, offering a clean, modern interface tailored to equity traders.
GO Markets instead relies on the industry-standard MT4 and MT5 platforms, which are packed with advanced charting, automated trading (EAs), and a huge library of third-party indicators.
Traders who value customization, algorithmic trading, or familiarity with MetaTrader will likely prefer GO Markets, while those who want a streamlined stock-trading experience will lean toward Stake.
GO Markets offers a substantially broader market selection, covering forex, CFDs, indices, commodities, and crypto, alongside leverage up to 1:500 for eligible accounts.
Stake, in contrast, is focused primarily on stocks, with leverage capped at 1:1, meaning no leveraged trading is available.
This makes GO Markets the clear choice for multi-asset traders and those who want to use leverage, while Stake suits investors focused specifically on direct stock ownership.
Weighing all factors together, Stake earns the higher overall rating of 3.4/5 compared to GO Markets's 3.3/5, driven largely by its stronger regulatory profile, lower costs, and zero minimum deposit.
That said, this is not a knockout victory. GO Markets remains a strong, more established option (founded in 2006 vs. 2017) for traders who need forex, CFD, and crypto access with higher leverage and MetaTrader platforms.
Our recommendation: choose Stake if you're a beginner-focused stock investor prioritizing low costs and simplicity; choose GO Markets if you're an active multi-asset trader who needs leverage and broader market access.
The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.
Stake edges out GO Markets overall based on our expert rating score.
Highest Rated
Stake
3.4 / 5 / 5
Category winners
Overall winner
Based on overall expert rating (3.4/5).
Better for beginners
Stronger onboarding and educational resources.
Lower trading costs
More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.
Stronger regulation
Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.
Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.