F
FBS
3.9 / 5Score: 4 / 4
FBS puts professional-grade trading within reach of anyone with just $1 to start.
- Min deposit
- $1
- Max leverage
- 1:3000
- Spread from
- 0 pips
- Regulators
- CySEC, ASIC, FSCA
Reviewed by Experts Updated 10/5/2026
FBS vs ACY Securities: In-Depth 2026 Broker Comparison
FBS and ACY Securities both appeal to forex and CFD traders, but they target very different audiences. Our proprietary research gives FBS a 3.9/5 rating against ACY Securities's 3.2/5, largely thanks to FBS's lower entry barrier and broader regulatory footprint.
AS
ACY Securities
3.2 / 5Score: 0 / 4
ACY Securities offers a straightforward, ASIC-regulated environment for traders who prefer traditional MT4/MT5 execution.
- Min deposit
- $50
- Max leverage
- 1:500
- Spread from
- 0 pips
- Regulators
- ASIC
Overall Winner
FBS
Best for Beginners
FBS
Lowest Fees
FBS
Top Regulation
FBS
Side-by-side comparison
Core features compared head-to-head.
| Feature | F FBS | AS ACY Securities |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.9 / 5 | 3.2 / 5 |
| Founded | 2009 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Limassol, Cyprus | Sydney, Australia |
| Regulation | CySEC, ASIC, FSCA | ASIC |
| Fees & Limits | ||
| Min Deposit | $1 | $50 |
| Spreads From | 0 pips | 0 pips |
| Commission | None | $3/lot |
| Max Leverage | 1:3000 | 1:500 |
| Platforms & Markets | ||
| Trading Platforms | MT4, MT5, Proprietary Mobile | MT4, MT5 |
| Markets Offered | Forex, Cfd, Stocks, Indices, Commodities, Crypto | Forex, Cfd, Indices, Commodities, Crypto |
Trading & non-trading fees
Min Deposit
FBS
$1
ACY Securities
$50
Spreads From
FBS
0 pips
ACY Securities
0 pips
Commission
FBS
None
ACY Securities
$3/lot
Deposit Fees
FBS
None
ACY Securities
None
Withdrawal Fees
FBS
None
ACY Securities
None
Pros & cons
F
FBS
Pros
- Industry-leading $1 minimum deposit makes it extremely accessible for new traders
- No per-trade commission keeps overall trading costs simple and transparent
- Leverage up to 1:3000 offers significant flexibility for experienced traders
- Multi-jurisdictional regulation across CySEC, ASIC, and FSCA builds added trust
- Three platform options including a proprietary mobile app for added convenience
- Wider asset selection that includes dedicated stock trading
- Higher overall rating of 3.9/5 reflects stronger all-round performance
Cons
- Extremely high leverage up to 1:3000 can significantly amplify losses for inexperienced traders
- Proprietary mobile platform may have a learning curve for traders used to only MT4/MT5
- Multi-regulator structure means account terms can vary depending on the entity used
- Crypto and CFD offerings still carry inherent market volatility risks regardless of broker
AS
ACY Securities
Pros
- Single, well-respected ASIC regulatory license
- No deposit or withdrawal fees on transactions
- Established track record since founding in 2011
- Reliable access to industry-standard MT4 and MT5 platforms
- Leverage up to 1:500 offers a more conservative risk profile
Cons
- $50 minimum deposit is notably higher than FBS's $1 entry point
- Per-lot commission of $3 adds extra cost on top of spreads
- Limited to a single regulatory jurisdiction compared to FBS's three
- No proprietary mobile platform or stock trading market access
- Lower overall rating of 3.2/5 compared to competing brokers
Our expert verdict
Editor's verdict
Overall winner FBS
Lowest fees FBS
Best regulation FBS
Better for beginners FBS
FBS is our recommended pick in this matchup, earning a 3.9/5 rating compared to ACY Securities's 3.2/5. FBS wins on accessibility with a $1 minimum deposit, carries multi-jurisdictional regulation from CySEC, ASIC, and FSCA, and offers commission-free trading with leverage up to 1:3000. ACY Securities remains a credible, ASIC-regulated alternative for traders who specifically want its platform setup, but for the majority of traders — especially beginners and cost-conscious retail clients — FBS delivers the stronger all-round package.
Regulation & Safety
Both brokers operate under recognized regulatory oversight, but the breadth of that oversight differs significantly. FBS is regulated by CySEC, ASIC, and FSCA, giving it coverage across Europe, Australia, and South Africa. This multi-jurisdictional licensing structure gives traders more regional protection options and reinforces confidence in the broker's compliance standards.
ACY Securities, by contrast, is regulated solely by ASIC. While ASIC is a respected tier-1 regulator known for strict capital and conduct requirements, having only a single license means ACY Securities offers less geographic flexibility for traders operating outside Australia's regulatory reach.
Neither broker charges deposit or withdrawal fees, which is a point of parity in terms of account safety and transparency around fund movement. However, FBS's broader regulatory footprint gives it the edge for traders who prioritize multi-region compliance and choice of entity.
Fees, Spreads & Commissions
Pricing is one of the clearest differentiators in this comparison. FBS advertises spreads from 0 pips with no per-trade commission at all, meaning the quoted spread is effectively the entire cost of trading on its standard offering.
ACY Securities also advertises spreads from 0 pips, but layers on a $3 per lot commission. For active or high-volume traders, this commission structure can meaningfully increase the total cost of trading compared to FBS's commission-free model.
Neither broker imposes deposit or withdrawal fees, so the primary cost differentiation comes down to trading costs rather than account administration fees. For cost-sensitive traders, FBS's zero-commission structure is the more straightforward and potentially cheaper setup over time.
Minimum Deposit & Accessibility
FBS is built with accessibility in mind, requiring just a $1 minimum deposit to open a live account. This makes it one of the easiest brokers to try out with minimal financial commitment, particularly appealing to beginners and traders testing strategies with small capital.
ACY Securities requires a $50 minimum deposit. While still a relatively low barrier to entry compared to many institutional-style brokers, it is 50 times higher than FBS's threshold.
For new traders or those who prefer to scale up gradually, FBS's near-zero entry point removes much of the friction associated with starting a live trading account.
Leverage & Trading Conditions
Leverage is another area where FBS significantly outpaces its competitor. FBS offers leverage up to 1:3000, giving experienced traders substantial flexibility to control larger positions with smaller amounts of capital.
ACY Securities caps leverage at 1:500, which is still a generous ratio by most regulatory standards but considerably more conservative than FBS's offering.
High leverage is a double-edged sword — it amplifies both potential gains and potential losses — so traders should weigh their own risk tolerance rather than simply chasing the highest number. Still, for traders who want maximum flexibility, FBS provides considerably more headroom.
Trading Platforms & Market Access
FBS supports MT4, MT5, and a proprietary mobile platform, giving traders three distinct ways to access the markets depending on their device and workflow preferences. This added proprietary option can appeal to traders who want a more streamlined, broker-specific mobile experience.
ACY Securities supports the industry-standard MT4 and MT5 platforms only. These are reliable, well-tested platforms trusted by millions of traders worldwide, but ACY Securities does not offer an additional proprietary alternative.
On market breadth, FBS edges ahead slightly by including standalone stock trading alongside forex, CFDs, indices, commodities, and crypto. ACY Securities covers forex, CFDs, indices, commodities, and crypto, but does not list dedicated stock trading among its offerings.
Our Verdict
When weighing regulation, costs, accessibility, and trading conditions together, FBS comes out ahead on nearly every measurable criterion in this comparison. Its 3.9/5 rating versus ACY Securities's 3.2/5 reflects a broader regulatory base, commission-free trading, a dramatically lower minimum deposit, and higher maximum leverage.
ACY Securities is not a weak broker by any means — its single ASIC license is a respected regulatory credential, and its platform lineup of MT4 and MT5 is dependable and widely trusted. It may suit traders who specifically prefer its execution environment or who are already comfortable within the ASIC regulatory framework.
For most traders, though, particularly beginners, cost-conscious traders, and those who want flexible leverage options, FBS presents the stronger overall package in 2026.
Verdict summary
The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.
Editor's verdict
FBS wins overall
FBS edges out ACY Securities overall based on our expert rating score.
F
Highest Rated
FBS
3.9 / 5 / 5
Category winners
Overall winner
Based on overall expert rating (3.9/5).
FBSBetter for beginners
Stronger onboarding and educational resources.
FBSLower trading costs
More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.
FBSStronger regulation
Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.
FBS
Frequently asked questions
Based on our independent rating methodology, FBS earns a 3.9/5 score compared to ACY Securities's 3.2/5. FBS leads thanks to its lower minimum deposit, commission-free trading, and broader multi-jurisdictional regulation. That said, the ideal choice always depends on individual trading priorities, so review the full comparison sections above before deciding.
Both brokers quote spreads starting from 0 pips, but ACY Securities adds a $3 per lot commission on top, while FBS charges no per-trade commission at all. This makes FBS the more cost-efficient option for traders who execute frequent or high-volume trades.
FBS requires just a $1 minimum deposit, making it one of the most accessible brokers for new traders. ACY Securities requires a $50 minimum deposit, which is still relatively low industry-wide but considerably higher than FBS's threshold.
FBS holds licenses from CySEC, ASIC, and FSCA, giving it a wider regulatory footprint across multiple regions. ACY Securities is regulated solely by ASIC. Both regulators are considered reputable, but FBS's multi-jurisdictional coverage provides more regional protection options for traders.
FBS supports MT4, MT5, and its own proprietary mobile platform, giving traders three distinct ways to trade. ACY Securities supports only MT4 and MT5, the two industry-standard platforms, without an additional proprietary alternative.
Yes, there is nothing preventing you from maintaining accounts at both brokers simultaneously. Many traders diversify across multiple platforms to access different markets, tools, and execution conditions based on their specific strategies.
FBS offers leverage up to 1:3000, substantially higher than ACY Securities's maximum of 1:500. While higher leverage can amplify potential profits, it equally increases potential losses, so traders should choose a leverage level aligned with their personal risk tolerance.
No, neither FBS nor ACY Securities charges fees on deposits or withdrawals. This parity means the real cost difference between the two brokers comes down to spreads and commissions rather than account funding charges.
FBS offers slightly broader market access, including forex, CFDs, stocks, indices, commodities, and crypto. ACY Securities covers forex, CFDs, indices, commodities, and crypto, but does not include dedicated stock trading in its market lineup.
ACY Securities may suit traders who specifically prefer a single ASIC-regulated environment, are comfortable with its $50 minimum deposit, and prioritize a more conservative 1:500 leverage cap. It's a solid option for traders who value simplicity and are already aligned with the ASIC regulatory framework.
Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.