FP Markets
Tight raw spreads and a four-platform lineup make FP Markets the go-to choice for cost-conscious, tech-savvy traders.
- Min deposit
- $100
- Max leverage
- 1:500
- Spread from
- 0 pips
- Regulators
- ASIC, CySEC
FP Markets edges out EasyMarkets in our 2026 head-to-head, backed by tighter spreads and a stronger platform lineup. EasyMarkets still appeals to budget-conscious beginners thanks to its $25 minimum deposit. Here's the full breakdown.
Tight raw spreads and a four-platform lineup make FP Markets the go-to choice for cost-conscious, tech-savvy traders.
A $25 minimum deposit and commission-free trading make EasyMarkets an approachable entry point for newer traders.
Core features compared head-to-head.
| Feature | FM FP Markets | E EasyMarkets |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.8 / 5 | 3.6 / 5 |
| Founded | 2005 | 2001 |
| Headquarters | Sydney, Australia | Limassol, Cyprus |
| Regulation | ASIC, CySEC | CySEC, ASIC |
| Fees & Limits | ||
| Min Deposit | $100 | $25 |
| Spreads From | 0 pips | 0.7 pips |
| Commission | $3/lot | None |
| Max Leverage | 1:500 | 1:400 |
| Platforms & Markets | ||
| Trading Platforms | MT4, MT5, TradingView, Proprietary Mobile | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile, MT4 |
| Markets Offered | Forex, Cfd, Stocks, Indices, Commodities, Crypto | Forex, Cfd, Stocks, Indices, Commodities, Crypto |
FP Markets
$100
EasyMarkets
$25
FP Markets
0 pips
EasyMarkets
0.7 pips
FP Markets
$3/lot
EasyMarkets
None
FP Markets
None
EasyMarkets
None
FP Markets
None
EasyMarkets
None
FP Markets is the better all-around choice, earning a 3.8/5 on our rating scale versus EasyMarkets's 3.6/5. It wins on spreads (0 pips vs 0.7 pips), leverage (1:500 vs 1:400), and platform variety, making it the stronger pick for the majority of traders. EasyMarkets remains a viable alternative for those prioritizing a lower $25 minimum deposit over raw trading costs.
Both brokers operate under credible tier-1 regulatory oversight, which is a critical factor for any trader evaluating long-term platform safety. FP Markets is regulated by ASIC and CySEC, while EasyMarkets holds licences from CySEC and ASIC as well — putting both firms on largely equal regulatory footing.
Since both brokers are overseen by the same two regulators, neither has a decisive structural safety advantage on paper. However, FP Markets earns our award for Best for Regulation, reflecting stronger overall compliance infrastructure alongside its longer operational track record under these licences.
Traders prioritizing capital protection can reasonably trust either broker, though FP Markets' combination of regulation and product transparency gives it a slight edge in our overall risk assessment.
This is where the comparison becomes most decisive. FP Markets offers spreads from 0 pips paired with a $3 per lot commission, a structure typically favored by active and high-volume traders seeking raw pricing.
EasyMarkets, by contrast, charges no per-trade commission but starts spreads at 0.7 pips, effectively building its cost into the spread itself. For lower-frequency or casual traders, this simpler all-in pricing may feel more predictable.
Neither broker charges deposit or withdrawal fees, which is a welcome parity that removes friction around account funding. Overall, FP Markets' raw spread model tends to work out cheaper for anyone trading with meaningful frequency or volume.
EasyMarkets holds a clear advantage for beginners or smaller-capital traders, requiring just a $25 minimum deposit compared to FP Markets' $100 threshold.
This lower barrier to entry makes EasyMarkets an attractive on-ramp for those testing strategies or trading with modest account sizes before scaling up.
That said, FP Markets' $100 minimum is still modest by industry standards, and the tighter spreads it offers can offset the higher entry cost fairly quickly once trading volume increases.
FP Markets supports a notably broader platform suite: MT4, MT5, TradingView, and a proprietary mobile app. This gives traders flexibility to choose between industry-standard terminals and modern charting tools like TradingView.
EasyMarkets, meanwhile, offers a Proprietary Web platform, a proprietary mobile app, and MT4 — a more streamlined but less versatile lineup.
For traders who value platform choice, especially access to MT5 and TradingView alongside the classic MT4, FP Markets is the stronger option. EasyMarkets' proprietary tools may still appeal to those who prefer simplified, guided interfaces.
FP Markets offers maximum leverage of 1:500 compared to EasyMarkets' 1:400, giving FP Markets clients slightly more capital efficiency for those who understand and accept the added risk.
Both brokers provide access to an identical range of markets, including Forex, CFDs, stocks, indices, commodities, and crypto — so market breadth is not a differentiating factor here.
Given the matched market access, the leverage ceiling becomes a meaningful tiebreaker for traders who actively use margin as part of their strategy.
FP Markets is our recommended pick in this comparison, scoring 3.8/5 versus EasyMarkets's 3.6/5 on our independent rating scale. It wins across fees, leverage, and platform variety, while both brokers share comparable tier-1 regulatory credibility.
EasyMarkets remains a sensible option for beginners or traders with smaller starting capital, thanks to its accessible $25 minimum deposit and commission-free structure.
For the majority of traders — particularly those trading with volume or seeking broader platform choice — FP Markets delivers the stronger overall package in 2026.
The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.
FP Markets edges out EasyMarkets overall based on our expert rating score.
Highest Rated
FP Markets
3.8 / 5 / 5
Category winners
Overall winner
Based on overall expert rating (3.8/5).
Better for beginners
Stronger onboarding and educational resources.
Lower trading costs
More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.
Stronger regulation
Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.
Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.