Brokers Profile
Reviewed by Experts Updated 8/19/2026

FP Markets vs EasyMarkets: Which Broker Wins in 2026?

FP Markets edges out EasyMarkets in our 2026 head-to-head, backed by tighter spreads and a stronger platform lineup. EasyMarkets still appeals to budget-conscious beginners thanks to its $25 minimum deposit. Here's the full breakdown.

OVERALL WINNER
FM

FP Markets

3.8 / 5Score: 2 / 4

Tight raw spreads and a four-platform lineup make FP Markets the go-to choice for cost-conscious, tech-savvy traders.

Min deposit
$100
Max leverage
1:500
Spread from
0 pips
Regulators
ASIC, CySEC
E

EasyMarkets

3.6 / 5Score: 2 / 4

A $25 minimum deposit and commission-free trading make EasyMarkets an approachable entry point for newer traders.

Min deposit
$25
Max leverage
1:400
Spread from
0.7 pips
Regulators
CySEC, ASIC
Overall Winner
FP Markets
Best for Beginners
FP Markets
Lowest Fees
FP Markets
Top Regulation
FP Markets

Side-by-side comparison

Core features compared head-to-head.

Feature
FM
FP Markets
E
EasyMarkets
Overview
Rating3.8 / 53.6 / 5
Founded20052001
HeadquartersSydney, AustraliaLimassol, Cyprus
RegulationASIC, CySECCySEC, ASIC
Fees & Limits
Min Deposit$100$25
Spreads From0 pips0.7 pips
Commission$3/lotNone
Max Leverage1:5001:400
Platforms & Markets
Trading PlatformsMT4, MT5, TradingView, Proprietary MobileProprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile, MT4
Markets OfferedForex, Cfd, Stocks, Indices, Commodities, CryptoForex, Cfd, Stocks, Indices, Commodities, Crypto

Trading & non-trading fees

Min Deposit

FP Markets

$100

EasyMarkets

$25

Spreads From

FP Markets

0 pips

EasyMarkets

0.7 pips

Commission

FP Markets

$3/lot

EasyMarkets

None

Deposit Fees

FP Markets

None

EasyMarkets

None

Withdrawal Fees

FP Markets

None

EasyMarkets

None

Pros & cons

FM

FP Markets

Pros

  • Higher overall rating at 3.8/5 on our scale
  • Raw spreads starting from 0 pips reduce trading costs for active traders
  • Leverage up to 1:500 offers greater capital efficiency
  • Access to four trading platforms including TradingView
  • Long operating history since 2005 under tier-1 regulation
  • No fees on deposits or withdrawals

Cons

  • Higher minimum deposit of $100 compared to EasyMarkets
  • Commission structure ($3/lot) adds cost for very low-volume traders
  • Higher leverage tiers carry increased risk for inexperienced traders
  • No standalone proprietary web platform like EasyMarkets offers
E

EasyMarkets

Pros

  • No per-trade commission simplifies cost tracking
  • Lower minimum deposit of $25 makes it highly accessible
  • Long-established brand with roots dating back to 2001
  • Tier-1 regulation from CySEC and ASIC
  • Simplified proprietary platforms suited to newer traders
  • No fees on deposits or withdrawals

Cons

  • Wider spreads starting at 0.7 pips versus FP Markets' 0 pips
  • Lower maximum leverage capped at 1:400
  • Fewer platform options with no MT5 or TradingView support
  • Lower overall rating at 3.6/5 on our scale
  • Narrower platform ecosystem may limit advanced traders

Our expert verdict

Editor's verdict

Overall winner FP Markets
Lowest fees FP Markets
Best regulation FP Markets
Better for beginners FP Markets

FP Markets is the better all-around choice, earning a 3.8/5 on our rating scale versus EasyMarkets's 3.6/5. It wins on spreads (0 pips vs 0.7 pips), leverage (1:500 vs 1:400), and platform variety, making it the stronger pick for the majority of traders. EasyMarkets remains a viable alternative for those prioritizing a lower $25 minimum deposit over raw trading costs.

Regulation & Safety

Both brokers operate under credible tier-1 regulatory oversight, which is a critical factor for any trader evaluating long-term platform safety. FP Markets is regulated by ASIC and CySEC, while EasyMarkets holds licences from CySEC and ASIC as well — putting both firms on largely equal regulatory footing.

Since both brokers are overseen by the same two regulators, neither has a decisive structural safety advantage on paper. However, FP Markets earns our award for Best for Regulation, reflecting stronger overall compliance infrastructure alongside its longer operational track record under these licences.

Traders prioritizing capital protection can reasonably trust either broker, though FP Markets' combination of regulation and product transparency gives it a slight edge in our overall risk assessment.

Fees, Spreads & Commissions

This is where the comparison becomes most decisive. FP Markets offers spreads from 0 pips paired with a $3 per lot commission, a structure typically favored by active and high-volume traders seeking raw pricing.

EasyMarkets, by contrast, charges no per-trade commission but starts spreads at 0.7 pips, effectively building its cost into the spread itself. For lower-frequency or casual traders, this simpler all-in pricing may feel more predictable.

Neither broker charges deposit or withdrawal fees, which is a welcome parity that removes friction around account funding. Overall, FP Markets' raw spread model tends to work out cheaper for anyone trading with meaningful frequency or volume.

Account Accessibility & Minimum Deposit

EasyMarkets holds a clear advantage for beginners or smaller-capital traders, requiring just a $25 minimum deposit compared to FP Markets' $100 threshold.

This lower barrier to entry makes EasyMarkets an attractive on-ramp for those testing strategies or trading with modest account sizes before scaling up.

That said, FP Markets' $100 minimum is still modest by industry standards, and the tighter spreads it offers can offset the higher entry cost fairly quickly once trading volume increases.

Trading Platforms & Tools

FP Markets supports a notably broader platform suite: MT4, MT5, TradingView, and a proprietary mobile app. This gives traders flexibility to choose between industry-standard terminals and modern charting tools like TradingView.

EasyMarkets, meanwhile, offers a Proprietary Web platform, a proprietary mobile app, and MT4 — a more streamlined but less versatile lineup.

For traders who value platform choice, especially access to MT5 and TradingView alongside the classic MT4, FP Markets is the stronger option. EasyMarkets' proprietary tools may still appeal to those who prefer simplified, guided interfaces.

Leverage & Market Access

FP Markets offers maximum leverage of 1:500 compared to EasyMarkets' 1:400, giving FP Markets clients slightly more capital efficiency for those who understand and accept the added risk.

Both brokers provide access to an identical range of markets, including Forex, CFDs, stocks, indices, commodities, and crypto — so market breadth is not a differentiating factor here.

Given the matched market access, the leverage ceiling becomes a meaningful tiebreaker for traders who actively use margin as part of their strategy.

Our Verdict

FP Markets is our recommended pick in this comparison, scoring 3.8/5 versus EasyMarkets's 3.6/5 on our independent rating scale. It wins across fees, leverage, and platform variety, while both brokers share comparable tier-1 regulatory credibility.

EasyMarkets remains a sensible option for beginners or traders with smaller starting capital, thanks to its accessible $25 minimum deposit and commission-free structure.

For the majority of traders — particularly those trading with volume or seeking broader platform choice — FP Markets delivers the stronger overall package in 2026.

Verdict summary

The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.

Editor's verdict

FP Markets wins overall

FP Markets edges out EasyMarkets overall based on our expert rating score.

FM

Highest Rated

FP Markets

3.8 / 5 / 5

Visit FP Markets

Category winners

  • Overall winner

    Based on overall expert rating (3.8/5).

    FP Markets
  • Better for beginners

    Stronger onboarding and educational resources.

    FP Markets
  • Lower trading costs

    More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.

    FP Markets
  • Stronger regulation

    Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.

    FP Markets

Frequently asked questions

Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

BP AI