FP Markets
Tier-1 regulated trading with tight spreads and a genuinely multi-asset platform suite.
- Min deposit
- $100
- Max leverage
- 1:500
- Spread from
- 0 pips
- Regulators
- ASIC, CySEC
Choosing between FP Markets and Pacific Union comes down to a trade-off between regulatory strength and accessibility. FP Markets leads with tier-1 oversight and a broader trading package, while Pacific Union appeals with a rock-bottom $20 minimum deposit.
Tier-1 regulated trading with tight spreads and a genuinely multi-asset platform suite.
An accessible entry point for budget-conscious traders wanting a low $20 minimum deposit.
Core features compared head-to-head.
| Feature | FM FP Markets | PU Pacific Union |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.8 / 5 | 3.2 / 5 |
| Founded | 2005 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Sydney, Australia | Mahé, Seychelles |
| Regulation | ASIC, CySEC | FSCA, FSA |
| Fees & Limits | ||
| Min Deposit | $100 | $20 |
| Spreads From | 0 pips | 0 pips |
| Commission | $3/lot | $3/lot |
| Max Leverage | 1:500 | 1:500 |
| Platforms & Markets | ||
| Trading Platforms | MT4, MT5, TradingView, Proprietary Mobile | MT4, MT5 |
| Markets Offered | Forex, Cfd, Stocks, Indices, Commodities, Crypto | Forex, Cfd, Indices, Commodities, Crypto |
FP Markets
$100
Pacific Union
$20
FP Markets
0 pips
Pacific Union
0 pips
FP Markets
$3/lot
Pacific Union
$3/lot
FP Markets
None
Pacific Union
None
FP Markets
None
Pacific Union
None
FP Markets is the clear winner of this matchup, earning a 3.8/5 rating against Pacific Union's 3.2/5, thanks to stronger tier-1 regulation, a wider spread of tradable markets, and a more versatile platform lineup. Pacific Union's key advantage is its low $20 minimum deposit, making it a reasonable pick for beginners with limited starting capital. For traders who can meet the $100 threshold, however, FP Markets delivers the stronger all-round package.
Regulatory strength is where the two brokers diverge most sharply. FP Markets is licensed by ASIC in Australia and CySEC in Cyprus, both recognized as robust, well-enforced regulatory regimes with strict capital adequacy and client fund segregation rules.
Pacific Union, in contrast, operates under FSCA and FSA licensing, jurisdictions generally regarded as offering lighter-touch oversight compared to ASIC or CySEC.
For traders who weigh fund safety heavily in their broker choice, this gap is significant. FP Markets' regulatory stack gives it a clear edge in our overall scoring.
Both brokers advertise spreads from 0 pips and an identical $3 per lot commission, meaning the headline cost of trading is essentially matched on paper.
Neither broker charges deposit or withdrawal fees, which is a welcome feature that helps both platforms compete on overall cost efficiency.
Since raw pricing is tied, the deciding factor comes down to what surrounds that pricing — namely regulatory quality, platform depth, and market access, all areas where FP Markets pulls ahead.
Pacific Union's standout advantage is accessibility. Its $20 minimum deposit is dramatically lower than FP Markets' $100 requirement, making it an easier entry point for traders with limited starting funds.
This makes Pacific Union a reasonable choice for beginners who want to test live trading conditions without committing significant capital upfront.
That said, a lower deposit threshold alone doesn't offset the broader trade-offs in regulation and platform variety that come with choosing Pacific Union over FP Markets.
FP Markets offers a notably richer platform lineup: MT4, MT5, TradingView integration, and a Proprietary Mobile app, giving traders flexibility in charting, automation, and mobile-first execution.
Pacific Union keeps things simple with just MT4 and MT5, the industry-standard duo that will feel familiar to most retail traders but lacks the extras.
Traders who value advanced charting through TradingView or a dedicated mobile experience will find FP Markets substantially more capable in this category.
FP Markets covers six asset classes — Forex, CFDs, Stocks, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto — giving traders genuine diversification opportunities within a single account.
Pacific Union covers five of those categories but leaves out dedicated stock trading, a meaningful gap for traders wanting direct equity exposure alongside forex and CFD positions.
This broader product range is another factor tipping our overall assessment in favor of FP Markets.
FP Markets is our recommended pick in this comparison, scoring 3.8/5 versus Pacific Union's 3.2/5. It holds stronger tier-1 regulatory backing via ASIC, a wider selection of platforms, and access to more market types.
Pacific Union remains a sensible option specifically for beginners working with smaller starting capital, thanks to its accessible $20 minimum deposit.
For the majority of traders, though, FP Markets offers the stronger, more complete overall package and earns our top recommendation in this matchup.
The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.
FP Markets edges out Pacific Union overall based on our expert rating score.
Highest Rated
FP Markets
3.8 / 5 / 5
Category winners
Overall winner
Based on overall expert rating (3.8/5).
Better for beginners
Stronger onboarding and educational resources.
Lower trading costs
More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.
Stronger regulation
Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.
Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.