IC Markets
IC Markets combines tier-1 ASIC regulation with ultra-tight spreads for serious traders who demand both safety and performance.
- Min deposit
- $200
- Max leverage
- 1:500
- Spread from
- 0 pips
- Regulators
- ASIC, CySEC
IC Markets and Tradeview both serve forex and CFD traders well, but they target different priorities. IC Markets leads on regulation and overall rating, while Tradeview appeals to budget-conscious beginners with its lower entry deposit.
IC Markets combines tier-1 ASIC regulation with ultra-tight spreads for serious traders who demand both safety and performance.
Tradeview opens the door to global markets with a budget-friendly $100 minimum deposit and lower per-lot trading costs.
Core features compared head-to-head.
| Feature | IM IC Markets | T Tradeview |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.9 / 5 | 3.3 / 5 |
| Founded | 2007 | 2004 |
| Headquarters | Sydney, Australia | Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands |
| Regulation | ASIC, CySEC | CIMA |
| Fees & Limits | ||
| Min Deposit | $200 | $100 |
| Spreads From | 0 pips | 0 pips |
| Commission | $3.5/lot | $2.5/lot |
| Max Leverage | 1:500 | 1:500 |
| Platforms & Markets | ||
| Trading Platforms | MT4, MT5, TradingView, Proprietary Mobile | MT4, MT5, cTrader, Proprietary Web |
| Markets Offered | Forex, Cfd, Crypto, Stocks, Indices, Commodities | Forex, Cfd, Stocks, Indices, Crypto |
IC Markets
$200
Tradeview
$100
IC Markets
0 pips
Tradeview
0 pips
IC Markets
$3.5/lot
Tradeview
$2.5/lot
IC Markets
None
Tradeview
None
IC Markets
None
Tradeview
None
IC Markets is the stronger overall choice, scoring 3.9/5 versus Tradeview's 3.3/5 on our independent rating system. IC Markets' tier-1 ASIC licence, tighter effective costs through its $3.5/lot commission structure, and broader six-asset market access give it the edge for most traders. Tradeview still holds appeal for newer traders thanks to its accessible $100 minimum deposit, but it cannot match IC Markets' regulatory depth or platform breadth.
Regulatory strength is often the single most important factor for serious traders, and this is where IC Markets pulls ahead decisively. IC Markets is regulated by ASIC in Australia and CySEC in Cyprus, giving it two well-recognized licences including a true tier-1 regulator.
Tradeview, by contrast, operates under a CIMA licence from the Cayman Islands. While CIMA is a legitimate regulator, it does not carry the same enforcement weight or investor protection infrastructure as ASIC.
For traders who prioritize fund safety and regulatory recourse, IC Markets' two-licence structure with ASIC oversight provides noticeably stronger peace of mind than Tradeview's single offshore licence.
Both brokers advertise spreads from 0 pips, putting them on equal footing at the headline level. The real difference emerges in commission structure: IC Markets charges $3.5 per lot, while Tradeview charges a lower $2.5 per lot.
Neither broker charges deposit or withdrawal fees, which is a welcome feature for cost-conscious traders on both platforms. This removes a common friction point that erodes returns on other platforms.
For high-frequency or high-volume traders, Tradeview's lower per-lot commission could translate into meaningful savings over time, even though IC Markets wins on overall rating. Traders should calculate their expected monthly volume to see which fee structure suits them best.
IC Markets supports MT4, MT5, TradingView, and a proprietary mobile app, giving traders a flexible mix of industry-standard platforms plus modern charting tools via TradingView integration.
Tradeview counters with MT4, MT5, cTrader, and a proprietary web platform. The inclusion of cTrader is a notable draw for traders who prefer its advanced order execution and clean interface over MetaTrader alternatives.
Both brokers cover the essential MT4/MT5 bases, so the decision here largely comes down to personal preference: traders wanting TradingView's charting ecosystem should lean IC Markets, while cTrader loyalists will find Tradeview more suitable.
Tradeview has a clear advantage for traders starting with limited capital, requiring just a $100 minimum deposit compared to IC Markets' $200 threshold.
This $100 difference may seem small, but for beginners testing strategies with real money for the first time, a lower barrier to entry can matter significantly.
That said, IC Markets' higher minimum is still modest by industry standards and shouldn't be a dealbreaker for most traders who have at least a small amount of trading capital set aside.
IC Markets offers access to six market categories: Forex, CFDs, Crypto, Stocks, Indices, and Commodities. Tradeview covers five of these same categories but does not list Commodities as a separate offering.
Both brokers match each other on maximum leverage, offering up to 1:500 for eligible accounts, which gives active traders substantial flexibility for margin-based strategies.
For traders who want commodities exposure alongside their forex and crypto positions, IC Markets' broader market range offers a more complete one-stop solution.
IC Markets is our recommended pick in this comparison, scoring 3.87/5 versus Tradeview's 3.28/5 on our independent rating system. Its tier-1 ASIC regulation, wider market coverage, and TradingView integration make it the stronger all-around platform for most trading styles.
Tradeview remains a credible alternative, particularly for beginners prioritizing a lower $100 minimum deposit and lower per-lot commissions. Its longer track record since 2004 and cTrader support also add genuine value.
Ultimately, traders prioritizing regulatory strength and platform breadth should choose IC Markets, while those seeking a lower-cost entry point may find Tradeview a comfortable starting ground.
The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.
IC Markets edges out Tradeview overall based on our expert rating score.
Highest Rated
IC Markets
3.9 / 5 / 5
Category winners
Overall winner
Based on overall expert rating (3.9/5).
Better for beginners
Stronger onboarding and educational resources.
Lower trading costs
More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.
Stronger regulation
Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.
Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.