TMGM
TMGM combines tier-1 ASIC and FCA regulation with zero-pip spreads and full market access, including stocks.
- Min deposit
- $100
- Max leverage
- 1:500
- Spread from
- 0 pips
- Regulators
- ASIC, FCA
TMGM and Tickmill are both established forex and CFD brokers, but they cater to slightly different priorities. Our research gives TMGM the edge overall with a 3.5/5 rating versus Tickmill's 3.3/5, though Tickmill counters with broader multi-jurisdiction regulation.
TMGM combines tier-1 ASIC and FCA regulation with zero-pip spreads and full market access, including stocks.
Tickmill spreads its regulatory coverage across three jurisdictions while keeping commissions low at $2 per lot.
Core features compared head-to-head.
| Feature | T TMGM | T Tickmill |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.5 / 5 | 3.3 / 5 |
| Founded | 2013 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Melbourne, Australia | London, UK |
| Regulation | ASIC, FCA | FCA, CySEC, FSCA |
| Fees & Limits | ||
| Min Deposit | $100 | $100 |
| Spreads From | 0 pips | 0 pips |
| Commission | $3.5/lot | $2/lot |
| Max Leverage | 1:500 | 1:500 |
| Platforms & Markets | ||
| Trading Platforms | MT4, MT5 | MT4, MT5 |
| Markets Offered | Forex, Cfd, Indices, Commodities, Stocks | Forex, Cfd, Indices, Commodities |
TMGM
$100
Tickmill
$100
TMGM
0 pips
Tickmill
0 pips
TMGM
$3.5/lot
Tickmill
$2/lot
TMGM
None
Tickmill
None
TMGM
None
Tickmill
None
TMGM takes the win in this matchup with a 3.5/5 overall rating compared to Tickmill's 3.3/5, driven by tier-1 ASIC and FCA regulation, a wider range of tradable markets, and a longer operating history. Tickmill remains a strong runner-up, particularly for traders who value licensing across three separate regulators (FCA, CySEC, FSCA) rather than fewer, higher-tier ones. For most retail traders, however, TMGM's blend of low-cost trading, robust regulation, and market breadth makes it the more well-rounded choice.
Regulation is often the single most important factor for traders choosing between two brokers, and this is where the comparison gets nuanced. TMGM is regulated by ASIC (Australia) and the FCA (UK), two of the most respected tier-1 regulatory bodies in the world, both known for strict capital adequacy and client fund segregation rules.
Tickmill, on the other hand, holds licences from the FCA, CySEC, and FSCA — giving it a broader geographic regulatory footprint across three jurisdictions rather than two. This makes Tickmill an appealing option for traders who want a broker with a presence validated across multiple regions.
That said, quality often outweighs quantity in regulatory terms. TMGM's combination of ASIC and FCA oversight is generally viewed as offering stronger overall investor protection than a broader mix that includes FSCA, which is a comparatively lighter-touch regulator. This is why our data awards TMGM the higher safety-adjusted overall rating despite Tickmill's extra licence.
Both brokers advertise spreads starting from 0 pips, making headline pricing highly competitive on both sides. Where they diverge is on commission structure: TMGM charges $3.5 per lot on its raw spread accounts, while Tickmill charges a lower $2 per lot.
For high-frequency and volume traders, Tickmill's lower per-lot commission could translate into meaningful savings over hundreds of trades, even though TMGM's overall rating remains higher on other criteria. Neither broker charges deposit or withdrawal fees, which is a welcome standard for cost-conscious traders on both platforms.
Minimum deposit requirements are identical at $100 for both brokers, so neither has an edge in terms of initial capital accessibility. Traders should weigh their expected trading volume carefully — scalpers and high-volume traders may find Tickmill's commission structure marginally more economical.
TMGM and Tickmill both standardise on the industry's two most trusted platforms: MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5. This parity means traders switching between the two brokers won't face a learning curve, as charting tools, expert advisors (EAs), and order execution workflows remain familiar.
Neither broker has introduced a fully proprietary platform, which may be viewed as a limitation for traders seeking more modern, built-in social trading or copy-trading dashboards outside of third-party MT4/MT5 plugins.
Where TMGM pulls ahead slightly is market breadth: it offers Forex, CFDs, Indices, Commodities, and Stocks, while Tickmill's offering excludes direct stock trading, limiting it to Forex, CFDs, Indices, and Commodities. Traders wanting single-account access to equities may find TMGM the more versatile platform.
Both brokers offer maximum leverage of up to 1:500, putting them on equal footing for traders who rely on higher leverage ratios to maximise capital efficiency. This parity means leverage is unlikely to be a deciding factor between the two.
Execution quality and spread consistency during high-volatility news events are harder to quantify from headline data alone, but both brokers' zero-pip advertised spreads suggest ECN/STP-style raw pricing models designed for active traders.
Given the identical leverage caps and $100 minimum deposits, the primary differentiators remain regulatory tier, commission cost per lot, and available markets, all of which have been addressed in the sections above.
TMGM was founded in 2013 and is headquartered in Melbourne, Australia, giving it a slightly longer operating history than Tickmill, which was established in 2014 and is based in London, UK. While a one-year difference is not dramatic, TMGM's marginally longer track record contributes positively to its overall trust score.
Both brokers have built solid reputations in the retail forex and CFD space, but TMGM's Australian roots align it closely with ASIC's stringent oversight framework, while Tickmill's London base ties it to FCA standards alongside its CySEC and FSCA licences.
Ultimately, both companies are legitimate, well-established players, but our overall rating system favours TMGM's slightly longer history and tier-1 dual regulation when all factors are weighted together.
The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.
TMGM edges out Tickmill overall based on our expert rating score.
Highest Rated
TMGM
3.5 / 5 / 5
Category winners
Overall winner
Based on overall expert rating (3.5/5).
Better for beginners
Stronger onboarding and educational resources.
Lower trading costs
More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.
Stronger regulation
Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.
Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.