Bitstamp
Bitstamp is one of the world's longest-running and most strictly regulated cryptocurrency exchanges, trusted by traders since 2011.
- Min deposit
- $0
- Max leverage
- 1:1
- Spread from
- 0.5 pips
- Regulators
- FCA, SEC
Choosing between Bitstamp and Public.com comes down to what kind of investor you are. Bitstamp leads with stronger regulation and a proven 15-year track record, while Public.com shines with zero-commission trading and a beginner-friendly mobile experience. Read our full breakdown to find out which platform is the right fit for your portfolio.
Bitstamp is one of the world's longest-running and most strictly regulated cryptocurrency exchanges, trusted by traders since 2011.
Public.com reinvents investing for the mobile generation with zero commissions, fractional shares, and a social feed that makes building wealth feel like a community experience.
Core features compared head-to-head.
| Feature | B Bitstamp | P Public.com |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.3 / 5 | 3.0 / 5 |
| Founded | 2011 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Luxembourg | New York, USA |
| Regulation | FCA, SEC | SEC |
| Fees & Limits | ||
| Min Deposit | $0 | $0 |
| Spreads From | 0.5 pips | 0 pips |
| Commission | $0.4/lot | None |
| Max Leverage | 1:1 | 1:1 |
| Platforms & Markets | ||
| Trading Platforms | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile | Proprietary Mobile |
| Markets Offered | Crypto | Stocks, Crypto |
Bitstamp
$0
Public.com
$0
Bitstamp
0.5 pips
Public.com
0 pips
Bitstamp
$0.4/lot
Public.com
None
Bitstamp
None
Public.com
None
Bitstamp
None
Public.com
None
Bitstamp wins overall with a 3.3/5 rating versus Public.com's 3.0/5, primarily because of its dual FCA and SEC regulation, longer operating history since 2011, and a more complete multi-platform trading environment. However, Public.com takes the lead on cost-efficiency with zero-commission trades and tighter spreads starting from 0 pips, making it the smarter pick for budget-conscious, mobile-first investors trading stocks and crypto.
Bitstamp holds regulatory licenses from both the FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) in the UK and the SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) in the United States. This dual-regulatory framework places it among the more rigorously overseen cryptocurrency exchanges available to retail traders, offering a meaningful layer of investor protection. Being regulated by two of the world's most respected financial watchdogs is a significant trust signal, especially in the volatile crypto space.
Public.com, by contrast, operates under a single SEC license. While SEC oversight is undeniably credible and provides essential protections for US-based investors, it does not carry the same breadth of international coverage that Bitstamp's dual licensing provides. For traders who prioritize regulatory robustness above all else, Bitstamp clearly holds the advantage in this category.
It is also worth noting that Bitstamp was founded in 2011, making it one of the oldest and most battle-tested cryptocurrency exchanges in the world. Its longevity through multiple market cycles, regulatory shifts, and industry crises speaks to institutional-grade resilience. Public.com, founded in 2019, is a newer entrant and has not yet had the same opportunity to demonstrate long-term regulatory durability.
Bottom line: Bitstamp is the clear winner on regulation and safety, offering broader oversight and a decade-plus track record of compliance.
Public.com takes the lead when it comes to trading costs. It offers spreads starting from 0 pips and charges zero per-trade commissions, making it an exceptionally cost-effective option for frequent traders and those just starting out with smaller account sizes. There are also no deposit or withdrawal fees, which means more of your capital stays working for you.
Bitstamp charges spreads from 0.5 pips and a commission of $0.4 per lot. While these costs are not prohibitive by industry standards, they are noticeably higher than what Public.com offers. For active traders executing many transactions per week, this difference can compound meaningfully over time and eat into overall returns.
Neither platform charges deposit or withdrawal fees, which is a welcome feature shared by both brokers and helps reduce the friction of moving funds in and out of your account. Both also have a $0 minimum deposit, making them equally accessible from an entry-cost perspective.
In summary, if minimizing trading costs is your primary concern, Public.com offers a more attractive fee structure. Bitstamp's fees are reasonable for a regulated exchange but cannot match the zero-commission model offered by its rival.
Bitstamp is a pure-play cryptocurrency exchange, focusing exclusively on the crypto market. This specialization means the platform is deeply optimized for crypto trading, offering a curated selection of digital assets with institutional-grade infrastructure behind them. If crypto is your sole investment focus, Bitstamp's concentrated offering is a strength rather than a limitation.
Public.com offers access to two distinct market types: stocks and crypto. This makes it a more versatile platform for investors who want to build a diversified portfolio from a single app. The ability to buy fractional shares of US-listed companies alongside crypto assets in one unified interface is a genuine advantage for multi-asset investors.
For traders whose strategy spans traditional equities and digital currencies, Public.com's broader market access is a clear differentiator. Bitstamp, while excellent within its niche, simply cannot serve investors who also want stock market exposure without using a secondary platform.
If you are a dedicated crypto trader with no interest in equities, Bitstamp's depth in that single market may be sufficient. But for those who want more flexibility and asset diversity, Public.com wins this category outright.
Bitstamp supports two proprietary platforms: a web-based trading interface and a dedicated mobile application. The web platform is functional and designed for traders who prefer a full desktop experience with more screen real estate for chart analysis and order management. Having both a web and mobile platform gives users more flexibility in how and where they trade.
Public.com operates exclusively through its proprietary mobile app. While the app is well-designed, intuitive, and praised for its social investing feed that lets users see what others are buying, the absence of a desktop or web platform is a notable limitation for traders who prefer a larger-screen experience or need more advanced charting tools.
Bitstamp's dual-platform support gives it a practical edge for traders who want to switch between devices seamlessly. The web platform in particular caters to more detail-oriented users who want to execute orders with precision and review deeper market data without being constrained by a mobile screen.
From a pure technology access standpoint, Bitstamp offers more options. Public.com's mobile-only approach works well for casual, on-the-go investors but may frustrate more experienced traders who rely on desktop workflows.
Public.com was purpose-built for the modern retail investor. Its social investing feed, fractional share support, and clean mobile-first design make it an outstanding entry point for beginners who are new to investing and want a low-pressure, community-driven environment. The zero-commission model also removes the financial intimidation that can deter first-time investors.
Bitstamp, while accessible with its $0 minimum deposit, is more oriented toward traders who take cryptocurrency seriously. Its dual regulatory compliance, longer history, and support for a web platform suggest a platform built with a more experienced or institutional audience in mind. Beginners can certainly use it, but the experience feels more professional and less hand-holding than Public.com.
Interestingly, despite the data categorizing Bitstamp as better for beginners in terms of overall credibility and safety, Public.com's user interface and zero-cost model arguably make it the more approachable option for someone placing their very first trade. The social feed feature in particular helps new investors learn from the community in real time.
Ultimately, your ideal platform depends on your goals. If you are a crypto-focused trader who values regulatory protection and platform flexibility, Bitstamp is the stronger choice. If you are a new investor wanting a seamless mobile experience with no commissions and access to both stocks and crypto, Public.com is hard to beat.
After a thorough head-to-head evaluation across regulation, fees, markets, platforms, and user experience, Bitstamp earns our overall rating of 3.3/5 compared to Public.com's 3.0/5. The margin is not massive, but Bitstamp's dual regulatory licenses, longer operational history, and multi-platform support give it a meaningful structural advantage for serious traders.
Public.com is far from a weak contender, however. Its zero-commission model, broader market access covering both stocks and crypto, and beautifully designed mobile app make it the superior choice for cost-conscious beginners and social investors. If fees and simplicity are your top priorities, Public.com deserves serious consideration.
Neither platform offers leverage beyond 1:1, which means neither is suited for margin traders or those seeking leveraged crypto or stock exposure. Both platforms also have identical $0 minimum deposits and no deposit or withdrawal fees, making them equally accessible on those fronts.
We recommend Bitstamp for experienced crypto traders who prioritize regulatory safety and platform flexibility, and Public.com for new investors who want a zero-cost, multi-asset mobile trading experience. Using both simultaneously is also a valid strategy for traders who want to benefit from each platform's unique strengths.
The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.
Bitstamp edges out Public.com overall based on our expert rating score.
Highest Rated
Bitstamp
3.3 / 5 / 5
Category winners
Overall winner
Based on overall expert rating (3.3/5).
Better for beginners
Stronger onboarding and educational resources.
Lower trading costs
More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.
Stronger regulation
Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.
Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.