Capital.com
Multi-asset trading made accessible, with tier-1 regulation and a $20 entry point.
- Min deposit
- $20
- Max leverage
- 1:200
- Spread from
- 0.6 pips
- Regulators
- FCA, CySEC, ASIC
Capital.com and Questrade appeal to very different types of traders, one built for accessible multi-asset CFD trading, the other rooted in North American brokerage tradition. Our independent rating gives Capital.com the edge overall at 4.0/5 versus Questrade's 3.3/5, though Questrade fights back on raw spread pricing.
Multi-asset trading made accessible, with tier-1 regulation and a $20 entry point.
A long-established North American brokerage built around tight raw spreads.
Core features compared head-to-head.
| Feature | C Capital.com | Q Questrade |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 3.3 / 5 |
| Founded | 2016 | 1999 |
| Headquarters | London, UK | Toronto, Canada |
| Regulation | FCA, CySEC, ASIC | SEC |
| Fees & Limits | ||
| Min Deposit | $20 | $1000 |
| Spreads From | 0.6 pips | 0 pips |
| Commission | None | $0.01/lot |
| Max Leverage | 1:200 | 1:3 |
| Platforms & Markets | ||
| Trading Platforms | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile, MT4 | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile |
| Markets Offered | Cfd, Forex, Stocks, Indices, Commodities, Crypto | Stocks, Forex, Indices, Commodities |
Capital.com
$20
Questrade
$1000
Capital.com
0.6 pips
Questrade
0 pips
Capital.com
None
Questrade
$0.01/lot
Capital.com
None
Questrade
None
Capital.com
None
Questrade
None
Capital.com is our recommended pick in this comparison, scoring 3.96/5 versus Questrade's 3.33/5 on our proprietary rating system. Capital.com wins on regulatory breadth with FCA and ASIC licensing, a far lower $20 minimum deposit, and a broader platform lineup that includes MT4. Questrade counters with tighter headline spreads from 0.0 pips and a longer operating history dating back to 1999. For most traders prioritizing accessibility, market breadth, and regulatory assurance, Capital.com offers the stronger overall package.
Regulatory strength is one of the clearest differentiators in this matchup. Capital.com is licensed across three tier-1 and tier-2 jurisdictions — the FCA in the UK, CySEC in Cyprus, and ASIC in Australia — giving it multi-region oversight that appeals to traders who value diversified regulatory coverage.
Questrade, by contrast, operates under a single regulatory umbrella through the SEC. While the SEC is a respected authority for US securities markets, having only one regulator on file gives Questrade less geographic flexibility for international traders.
For traders who prioritize fund safety and cross-border regulatory accountability, Capital.com's spread across FCA, CySEC, and ASIC gives it a clear structural advantage in this category.
This is the one category where Questrade genuinely competes. Questrade advertises spreads starting from 0.0 pips, undercutting Capital.com's 0.6 pip starting spread on paper. However, Questrade applies a $0.01 per lot commission structure, while Capital.com charges no per-trade commission at all.
That means Capital.com's all-in cost model is simpler and commission-free, whereas Questrade traders need to factor in commission charges on top of the tighter raw spread to understand their true cost per trade.
Neither broker charges deposit or withdrawal fees, which is a welcome point of parity. But for traders who want predictable, commission-free pricing without doing extra math, Capital.com's model is easier to budget around.
Accessibility is where the gap between these two brokers is widest. Capital.com requires just a $20 minimum deposit, making it one of the more approachable options for beginners or traders testing strategies with limited capital.
Questrade requires a $1,000 minimum deposit — fifty times higher than Capital.com's threshold. That is a significant barrier for newer traders or those who prefer to scale into a platform gradually.
If low-cost entry and capital flexibility matter to you, Capital.com is dramatically more accessible than Questrade's higher-commitment structure.
Capital.com offers leverage up to 1:200, substantially higher than Questrade's 1:3 maximum. This gives Capital.com traders considerably more flexibility for leveraged CFD strategies, though higher leverage always carries proportionally higher risk.
On market breadth, Capital.com supports CFDs, forex, stocks, indices, commodities, and crypto — six asset classes in total. Questrade covers stocks, forex, indices, and commodities, but does not list crypto or CFD access in its lineup.
Traders wanting a single account to access a wider spread of instruments, including crypto exposure, will find Capital.com's market menu noticeably more comprehensive.
Capital.com supports its own Proprietary Web and Mobile platforms alongside MT4, one of the industry's most widely used third-party trading terminals. This gives traders the option of a modern proprietary interface or the familiar MT4 ecosystem with its extensive indicator and EA library.
Questrade offers only its Proprietary Web and Mobile platforms, without third-party platform support. That may suit traders who prefer a self-contained brokerage experience, but it limits flexibility for those attached to MT4-based workflows.
For traders who value platform choice and the ability to switch between proprietary tools and industry-standard software, Capital.com's three-platform lineup is the more versatile setup.
Weighing regulation, fees, accessibility, leverage, and platform choice together, Capital.com earns the higher overall rating at 4.0/5 compared to Questrade's 3.3/5. Its combination of multi-jurisdictional regulation, a $20 minimum deposit, commission-free trading, and MT4 support make it the stronger all-around package for most traders in 2026.
Questrade still has a legitimate niche: it holds tighter raw spreads and a much longer 1999 founding history, which may appeal to traders anchored to the North American brokerage model or those who value SEC oversight specifically.
Ultimately, this comparison comes down to priorities. Beginners, cost-conscious traders, and those wanting broader market and platform access should lean Capital.com. Traders who specifically need Questrade's spread structure or existing ecosystem may still find it a solid fit.
The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.
Capital.com edges out Questrade overall based on our expert rating score.
Highest Rated
Capital.com
4.0 / 5 / 5
Category winners
Overall winner
Based on overall expert rating (4/5).
Better for beginners
Stronger onboarding and educational resources.
Lower trading costs
More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.
Stronger regulation
Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.
Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.