Crypto.com vs EasyEquities: Which Broker Wins in 2026?

Regulation & Safety

Regulatory strength is where Crypto.com pulls ahead decisively in this matchup. Crypto.com is licensed by both the FCA and MAS, two tier-1 regulators known for strict capital adequacy and client protection standards. This dual-licence structure gives traders added confidence when depositing funds and executing trades.

EasyEquities, by contrast, operates under a single FSCA licence out of South Africa. While the FSCA is a respected regulator within its jurisdiction, it doesn't carry quite the same global tier-1 weight as the FCA. For traders who prioritize regulatory redundancy, Crypto.com's two-licence setup is the safer bet.

Neither broker charges deposit or withdrawal fees, which is a reassuring baseline for both platforms. Ultimately, if regulatory oversight is your top priority, Crypto.com's broader coverage wins this category outright.

Fees & Spreads

This is the one area where EasyEquities genuinely shines. EasyEquities advertises spreads starting from 0 pips, undercutting Crypto.com's 0.4 pip starting spread. For high-frequency or cost-sensitive traders, that difference can add up meaningfully over time.

However, commission structures tell a slightly different story. Crypto.com charges $0.075 per lot, which is actually lower than EasyEquities's $0.25 per lot commission. So while EasyEquities wins on raw spread numbers, Crypto.com's lower commission partially offsets that advantage depending on trade size and frequency.

Both brokers require no minimum deposit, making either platform accessible to traders starting with limited capital. Overall, active scalpers chasing tight spreads may prefer EasyEquities, while lot-based traders might appreciate Crypto.com's lower per-lot commission.

Leverage & Market Access

Crypto.com offers considerably more leverage flexibility, with maximum leverage reaching 1:10 compared to EasyEquities's capped 1:1 ratio. This makes Crypto.com more appealing to traders who want to amplify positions, though it's worth noting that higher leverage also increases risk exposure.

On market diversity, EasyEquities takes the lead with access to stocks, ETFs, and crypto — three distinct asset classes under one roof. Crypto.com, true to its name, focuses specifically on crypto markets without broader stock or ETF access.

Traders wanting a one-stop platform to diversify across equities and digital assets will find EasyEquities's market breadth more suitable. Those focused purely on crypto trading with leverage flexibility will gravitate toward Crypto.com.

Platforms & Usability

Both brokers rely on proprietary technology rather than third-party platforms like MetaTrader. Crypto.com offers a Proprietary Mobile app alongside a Proprietary Web platform, while EasyEquities mirrors this setup with its own Proprietary Web and Proprietary Mobile offerings.

Neither broker supports MT4 or MT5, which may disappoint traders accustomed to industry-standard charting and automated trading tools. This is a shared limitation worth flagging for algorithmic traders.

In terms of day-to-day usability, both platforms are designed with simplicity in mind, catering more to retail investors than advanced technical traders. Your choice here will likely come down to which asset class — crypto versus multi-asset — you intend to trade most.

Company Background & Track Record

EasyEquities has a slightly longer operating history, having been founded in 2014 and headquartered in Johannesburg, South Africa. Crypto.com launched two years later in 2016 and is headquartered in Singapore, a major global crypto hub.

Both brokers have built recognizable brand presences in their respective niches, with EasyEquities popular among South African retail investors and Crypto.com known globally within the crypto trading community.

Longevity alone doesn't determine trustworthiness, but it's a relevant data point for traders weighing track record alongside regulatory strength and fee structure.

Our Verdict

When all factors are weighed together, Crypto.com earns the higher overall rating at 3.3/5 versus EasyEquities's 3.2/5. The deciding factors are Crypto.com's stronger dual regulatory licensing and higher available leverage, both of which matter significantly for serious traders.

That said, EasyEquities remains a strong contender for specific use cases — particularly traders who value tighter spreads and want exposure to stocks and ETFs alongside crypto. Neither broker is a poor choice; the right pick ultimately depends on whether regulation and leverage or fees and market variety matter more to your strategy.