F
FBS
3.9 / 5Score: 3 / 3
Trade global markets from just $1 with zero commissions and leverage up to 1:3000.
- Min deposit
- $1
- Max leverage
- 1:3000
- Spread from
- 0 pips
- Regulators
- CySEC, ASIC, FSCA
Reviewed by Experts Updated 9/1/2026
FBS vs Aetos Capital: The Complete 2026 Broker Comparison
FBS and Aetos Capital both target active forex and CFD traders, but they differ sharply on cost structure and accessibility. Our research gives FBS the edge overall with a 3.9/5 rating against Aetos Capital's 3.4/5, driven largely by fees and entry barriers.
AC
Aetos Capital
3.4 / 5Score: 0 / 3
FCA and ASIC-regulated trading with straightforward MetaTrader access.
- Min deposit
- $50
- Max leverage
- 1:500
- Spread from
- 0 pips
- Regulators
- ASIC, FCA
Overall Winner
FBS
Best for Beginners
FBS
Lowest Fees
FBS
Top Regulation
FBS
Side-by-side comparison
Core features compared head-to-head.
| Feature | F FBS | AC Aetos Capital |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.9 / 5 | 3.4 / 5 |
| Founded | 2009 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Limassol, Cyprus | Sydney, Australia |
| Regulation | CySEC, ASIC, FSCA | ASIC, FCA |
| Fees & Limits | ||
| Min Deposit | $1 | $50 |
| Spreads From | 0 pips | 0 pips |
| Commission | None | $3.5/lot |
| Max Leverage | 1:3000 | 1:500 |
| Platforms & Markets | ||
| Trading Platforms | MT4, MT5, Proprietary Mobile | MT4, MT5 |
| Markets Offered | Forex, Cfd, Stocks, Indices, Commodities, Crypto | Forex, Cfd, Indices, Commodities, Crypto |
Trading & non-trading fees
Min Deposit
FBS
$1
Aetos Capital
$50
Spreads From
FBS
0 pips
Aetos Capital
0 pips
Commission
FBS
None
Aetos Capital
$3.5/lot
Deposit Fees
FBS
None
Aetos Capital
None
Withdrawal Fees
FBS
None
Aetos Capital
None
Pros & cons
F
FBS
Pros
- Higher overall rating at 3.9/5 versus competitor's 3.4/5
- Zero per-trade commission on trading activity
- Extremely low $1 minimum deposit lowers entry barrier
- Higher maximum leverage at 1:3000 for flexible position sizing
- Broader regulatory coverage across three jurisdictions
- Wider asset selection including standalone stock trading
- No deposit or withdrawal fees on funding transactions
Cons
- High 1:3000 leverage can increase risk exposure for inexperienced traders
- Proprietary mobile platform may lack the familiarity of pure MT4/MT5 setups for veteran traders
- Multi-regulator structure means account terms can vary depending on entity
- Newer traders may need added education to use high leverage responsibly
AC
Aetos Capital
Pros
- Strong dual regulation from FCA and ASIC
- Conservative 1:500 leverage cap suits risk-averse traders
- No deposit or withdrawal fees on transactions
- Reliable, familiar MT4/MT5 platform support
- Established operating history since 2013
Cons
- Lower overall rating at 3.4/5 compared to competitor's 3.9/5
- Higher $50 minimum deposit raises the entry barrier
- Charges $3.5 per lot commission on top of spreads
- No standalone stock trading market access
- Lacks a proprietary or mobile-first platform alternative
Our expert verdict
Editor's verdict
Overall winner FBS
Lowest fees FBS
Best regulation FBS
Better for beginners FBS
FBS is the stronger overall choice, earning a 3.9/5 rating compared to Aetos Capital's 3.4/5 in our independent evaluation. FBS wins on cost efficiency with a $1 minimum deposit, zero commissions, and leverage up to 1:3000, making it far more accessible to newer or capital-constrained traders. Aetos Capital counters with tight FCA/ASIC regulatory coverage but its $50 deposit floor, $3.5/lot commission, and capped 1:500 leverage make it a comparatively costlier entry point. Unless you specifically need Aetos Capital's platform or market lineup, FBS delivers the stronger all-around package.
Regulation & Safety
FBS is regulated across three jurisdictions — CySEC, ASIC, and FSCA — giving it broad multi-region oversight that spans Europe, Australia, and South Africa. This layered regulatory footprint provides traders with a choice of entity depending on their residency, each carrying its own compensation and compliance framework.
Aetos Capital holds licences from ASIC and FCA, two of the most respected regulators globally, particularly the FCA's strict client money rules. While Aetos Capital's coverage is narrower in count, the FCA license alone carries significant weight for UK-based traders seeking robust protection.
Both brokers avoid deposit and withdrawal fees, which is a positive baseline for cost transparency. Overall, FBS's broader regulatory spread gives it a slight edge for global traders, while Aetos Capital remains a strong pick specifically for UK and Australian clients.
Fees, Spreads & Commissions
Both brokers advertise spreads starting from 0 pips, so the headline pricing looks identical on paper. The real differentiator emerges in commission structure: FBS charges no per-trade commission at all, while Aetos Capital applies a $3.5 per lot charge on top of its spreads.
For high-frequency or high-volume traders, that $3.5/lot commission on Aetos Capital can add up meaningfully over hundreds of trades, eroding net returns compared to FBS's commission-free model.
FBS also holds a clear advantage on capital requirements, with just a $1 minimum deposit versus Aetos Capital's $50 floor. This makes FBS dramatically more accessible for beginners or those testing strategies with minimal capital at risk.
Leverage & Trading Conditions
FBS offers substantially higher maximum leverage at 1:3000, compared to Aetos Capital's 1:500 cap. High leverage can amplify both gains and losses, so this is a double-edged consideration — aggressive traders may value FBS's flexibility, while risk-conscious traders may prefer Aetos Capital's more conservative ceiling.
Market access is broader with FBS as well, covering Forex, CFDs, Stocks, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto. Aetos Capital covers Forex, CFDs, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto, but notably excludes standalone Stocks trading.
Traders who need direct stock exposure alongside forex and crypto will find FBS's product suite more complete for a single-account experience.
Trading Platforms
FBS supports MT4, MT5, and a Proprietary Mobile app, giving traders three distinct ways to access markets, including a native mobile-first option built specifically for on-the-go execution.
Aetos Capital sticks to the industry-standard MT4 and MT5 combination, which remains reliable and familiar to most experienced traders but lacks a differentiated proprietary layer.
For traders who prioritize flexibility and mobile-native tools, FBS's extra platform option provides more ways to trade; those who prefer sticking strictly to MetaTrader will find both brokers equally capable.
Company Background & Track Record
FBS was founded in 2009 and is headquartered in Limassol, Cyprus, giving it roughly four more years of operating history than Aetos Capital, which launched in 2013 out of Sydney, Australia.
Both firms have had over a decade to establish operational processes, but FBS's longer track record and larger multi-jurisdictional footprint suggest a more globally scaled operation.
Neither company's headquarters location alone should be a deciding factor, but combined with regulatory breadth and product range, FBS presents a more mature, broadly accessible operation overall.
Our Verdict
FBS wins this comparison on our independent rating, scoring 3.9/5 against Aetos Capital's 3.4/5. The gap is driven primarily by cost accessibility — FBS's $1 minimum deposit, zero commissions, and higher leverage ceiling make it the more flexible choice for the majority of trader profiles.
Aetos Capital remains a credible alternative for traders who specifically value its FCA/ASIC-only regulatory simplicity or its particular platform setup, but its higher deposit floor and per-lot commission put it at a structural disadvantage for cost-sensitive traders.
For most forex, CFD, and crypto traders — especially beginners or those trading smaller accounts — FBS offers the stronger, more complete package in 2026.
Verdict summary
The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.
Editor's verdict
FBS wins overall
FBS edges out Aetos Capital overall based on our expert rating score.
F
Highest Rated
FBS
3.9 / 5 / 5
Category winners
Overall winner
Based on overall expert rating (3.9/5).
FBSBetter for beginners
Stronger onboarding and educational resources.
FBSLower trading costs
More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.
FBSStronger regulation
Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.
FBS
Frequently asked questions
Based on our independent rating system, FBS scores higher overall at 3.9/5 compared to Aetos Capital's 3.4/5. The difference largely comes down to lower fees, a smaller minimum deposit, and broader market access, though your ideal choice still depends on your personal trading style and regulatory preference.
FBS charges no per-trade commission at all, while Aetos Capital applies a $3.5 per lot fee on top of spreads that both start from 0 pips. For frequent traders, this commission difference can meaningfully impact overall trading costs over time.
FBS requires just a $1 minimum deposit, making it one of the most accessible options for new traders. Aetos Capital requires a $50 minimum deposit, which is still modest but noticeably higher than FBS's entry point.
FBS is regulated by CySEC, ASIC, and FSCA, spanning three separate jurisdictions. Aetos Capital is regulated by ASIC and FCA. Both offer credible oversight, though FBS's broader regulatory spread may appeal to traders across more regions.
FBS supports MT4, MT5, and a Proprietary Mobile app, giving traders an extra native mobile option. Aetos Capital supports only MT4 and MT5, sticking to the industry-standard MetaTrader suite.
Yes, FBS offers standalone stock trading alongside Forex, CFDs, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto. Aetos Capital's market lineup covers Forex, CFDs, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto, but does not include dedicated stock trading.
FBS offers substantially higher maximum leverage at up to 1:3000, compared to Aetos Capital's 1:500 cap. Higher leverage can increase both potential returns and risk, so traders should size positions carefully regardless of which broker they choose.
Yes, there's nothing stopping you from holding accounts at both brokers simultaneously. Many active traders diversify across multiple platforms to access different regulatory protections, markets, or platform tools.
No, both FBS and Aetos Capital advertise no deposit or withdrawal fees on standard funding transactions. Always double-check payment provider or currency conversion charges, which can vary depending on your funding method.
FBS is generally the better fit for beginners thanks to its $1 minimum deposit, zero commissions, and higher overall rating. Aetos Capital's higher deposit requirement and per-lot commission make it comparatively less beginner-friendly, though its regulatory profile remains solid.
Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.