Brokers Profile
Reviewed by Experts Updated 8/20/2026

FP Markets vs Fidelity: Which Broker Wins in 2026?

FP Markets and Fidelity serve very different trading crowds, but only one comes out on top in our independent scoring. FP Markets edges ahead with a 3.8/5 rating thanks to tighter spreads, deeper regulation, and a wider market menu. Fidelity remains a strong pick for cost-conscious beginners focused purely on US stocks.

OVERALL WINNER
FM

FP Markets

3.8 / 5Score: 1 / 4

A true multi-asset powerhouse offering tight spreads, high leverage, and professional-grade platforms across six market categories.

Min deposit
$100
Max leverage
1:500
Spread from
0 pips
Regulators
ASIC, CySEC
F

Fidelity

3.6 / 5Score: 3 / 4

An 80-year-old US financial institution offering commission-free stock investing with zero minimum deposit barriers.

Min deposit
$0
Max leverage
1:2
Spread from
0 pips
Regulators
SEC, CFTC
Overall Winner
FP Markets
Best for Beginners
Fidelity
Lowest Fees
FP Markets
Top Regulation
FP Markets

Side-by-side comparison

Core features compared head-to-head.

Feature
FM
FP Markets
F
Fidelity
Overview
Rating3.8 / 53.6 / 5
Founded20051946
HeadquartersSydney, AustraliaBoston, USA
RegulationASIC, CySECSEC, CFTC
Fees & Limits
Min Deposit$100$0
Spreads From0 pips0 pips
Commission$3/lotNone
Max Leverage1:5001:2
Platforms & Markets
Trading PlatformsMT4, MT5, TradingView, Proprietary MobileProprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile
Markets OfferedForex, Cfd, Stocks, Indices, Commodities, CryptoStocks, Indices, Commodities

Trading & non-trading fees

Min Deposit

FP Markets

$100

Fidelity

$0

Spreads From

FP Markets

0 pips

Fidelity

0 pips

Commission

FP Markets

$3/lot

Fidelity

None

Deposit Fees

FP Markets

None

Fidelity

None

Withdrawal Fees

FP Markets

None

Fidelity

None

Pros & cons

FM

FP Markets

Pros

  • Higher overall independent rating at 3.8/5 compared to competitors in this category
  • Access to significantly higher leverage of up to 1:500 for eligible accounts
  • Broader market coverage with six distinct asset classes to trade
  • Wider platform selection with four supported trading environments
  • Transparent commission structure with no hidden markups
  • Strong dual regulatory oversight from ASIC and CySEC
  • Zero fees on both deposits and withdrawals

Cons

  • Minimum deposit of $100 is higher than some no-minimum competitors
  • High leverage up to 1:500 significantly increases risk for inexperienced traders
  • Commission of $3/lot adds cost on high-volume trading strategies
  • Not regulated by US-specific bodies like the SEC or CFTC
  • Newer company history since 2005 compared to century-old institutions
F

Fidelity

Pros

  • No minimum deposit required, removing the barrier to entry entirely
  • Zero per-trade commission structure on stock investing
  • Strong regulatory backing from both the SEC and CFTC
  • Nearly eight decades of operating history since 1946
  • Simple, beginner-friendly proprietary platforms
  • No fees charged on deposits or withdrawals

Cons

  • Maximum leverage capped at just 1:2, limiting trading flexibility
  • No access to forex or cryptocurrency markets
  • Only two proprietary platforms with no MT4/MT5 or TradingView support
  • Lower overall independent rating of 3.6/5 versus top competitors
  • Limited to Stocks, Indices, and Commodities only

Our expert verdict

Editor's verdict

Overall winner FP Markets
Lowest fees FP Markets
Best regulation FP Markets
Better for beginners Fidelity

FP Markets is our top recommendation overall, scoring 3.84/5 versus Fidelity's 3.58/5 on our proprietary rating scale. FP Markets wins on regulatory breadth, platform variety, leverage, and multi-asset access, making it the stronger all-around package for active traders. Fidelity still holds appeal for beginners who want a $0 minimum deposit and zero-commission US stock trading, but it falls short on global market access and leverage flexibility.

Regulation & Safety

FP Markets is regulated by ASIC and CySEC, two well-respected tier-one and tier-two regulatory bodies that impose strict capital adequacy and client fund segregation rules on forex and CFD brokers.

Fidelity is overseen by the SEC and CFTC, both robust US regulators, giving it comparable regulatory credibility, particularly for traders who prioritize working within the US financial system.

Both brokers score well on safety, but FP Markets' multi-jurisdictional coverage across Australia and Europe gives it a slight edge for traders who want broader international protection.

Neither broker charges deposit or withdrawal fees, which is a welcome sign of transparency on both sides.

Fees, Spreads & Commissions

Both brokers advertise spreads from 0 pips, but the underlying cost structure differs meaningfully. FP Markets charges a $3 per lot commission on its raw spread accounts, a standard structure for ECN-style forex and CFD trading.

Fidelity charges no per-trade commission at all, which makes it exceptionally attractive for buy-and-hold stock investors who don't need forex or leveraged CFD exposure.

FP Markets' $100 minimum deposit is modest for a multi-asset broker offering leverage up to 1:500, while Fidelity's $0 minimum deposit removes virtually any barrier to entry for new investors.

For active forex and CFD traders, FP Markets' fee model is more competitive once volume increases, while Fidelity's zero-commission model favors lower-frequency stock investors.

Trading Platforms & Tools

FP Markets supports MT4, MT5, TradingView, and a proprietary mobile app, giving traders access to industry-standard charting, automated strategy tools, and social trading integrations.

Fidelity offers a proprietary web platform and a proprietary mobile app, both built specifically for long-term investing and portfolio management rather than active trading.

Traders who rely on Expert Advisors, custom indicators, or advanced charting will find FP Markets' platform lineup significantly more flexible and technically capable.

Fidelity's tools are streamlined and beginner-friendly, prioritizing simplicity and research integration over algorithmic trading features.

Market Access & Leverage

FP Markets covers six market categories: Forex, CFDs, Stocks, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto, offering leverage up to 1:500 depending on jurisdiction and instrument.

Fidelity restricts access to Stocks, Indices, and Commodities, with a maximum leverage of just 1:2, reflecting its conservative, long-term investment focus.

This gap makes FP Markets the clear choice for diversified traders who want forex and crypto exposure alongside traditional assets.

Fidelity's lower leverage ceiling is actually a benefit for risk-averse investors who want to avoid the amplified losses that come with high-leverage trading.

Company Background & Track Record

Fidelity was founded in 1946 and is headquartered in Boston, USA, giving it an 80-year operating history and deep institutional trust among American investors.

FP Markets was founded in 2005 and is headquartered in Sydney, Australia, making it a newer but still well-established player in the online forex and CFD space.

While Fidelity's longevity is impressive, FP Markets has built a solid two-decade reputation specifically within the retail forex and CFD trading community.

Both firms demonstrate long-term stability, though they cater to fundamentally different investor profiles built up over their respective histories.

Our Verdict

FP Markets earns our recommendation as the stronger overall broker, scoring 3.84/5 against Fidelity's 3.58/5, driven by superior leverage, platform variety, and multi-asset market access.

Fidelity remains an excellent choice specifically for beginners who want a zero minimum deposit and commission-free US stock investing without the complexity of leveraged trading.

If your priority is forex, CFDs, or crypto trading with professional-grade platforms, FP Markets is the more complete solution.

If you're a first-time investor focused solely on stocks with minimal capital, Fidelity's simplicity remains hard to beat.

Verdict summary

The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.

Editor's verdict

FP Markets wins overall

FP Markets edges out Fidelity overall based on our expert rating score.

FM

Highest Rated

FP Markets

3.8 / 5 / 5

Visit FP Markets

Category winners

  • Overall winner

    Based on overall expert rating (3.8/5).

    FP Markets
  • Better for beginners

    Stronger onboarding and educational resources.

    Fidelity
  • Lower trading costs

    More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.

    FP Markets
  • Stronger regulation

    Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.

    FP Markets

Frequently asked questions

Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

BP AI