F(
Futu (Moomoo)
3.7 / 5Score: 2 / 2
Three tier-1 regulators, zero commissions, and an all-in-one asset suite spanning stocks to crypto.
- Min deposit
- $0
- Max leverage
- 1:5
- Spread from
- 0 pips
- Regulators
- SFC, SEC, MAS
Reviewed by Experts Updated 9/2/2026
Futu (Moomoo) vs Longbridge: Which Broker Wins in 2026?
Futu (Moomoo) and Longbridge are both zero-commission platforms popular with Asia-based investors, but they differ sharply on regulatory depth and market access. Our proprietary rating puts Futu (Moomoo) ahead at 3.7/5 versus Longbridge's 3.4/5. Here's the full breakdown to help you decide.
L
Longbridge
3.4 / 5Score: 0 / 2
A streamlined, zero-commission proprietary platform built for straightforward stock and ETF investing.
- Min deposit
- $0
- Max leverage
- 1:5
- Spread from
- 0 pips
- Regulators
- SFC, MAS
Overall Winner
Futu (Moomoo)
Best for Beginners
Futu (Moomoo)
Lowest Fees
Futu (Moomoo)
Top Regulation
Futu (Moomoo)
Side-by-side comparison
Core features compared head-to-head.
| Feature | F( Futu (Moomoo) | L Longbridge |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.7 / 5 | 3.4 / 5 |
| Founded | 2012 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Hong Kong, China | Hong Kong |
| Regulation | SFC, SEC, MAS | SFC, MAS |
| Fees & Limits | ||
| Min Deposit | $0 | $0 |
| Spreads From | 0 pips | 0 pips |
| Commission | None | None |
| Max Leverage | 1:5 | 1:5 |
| Platforms & Markets | ||
| Trading Platforms | Moomoo, Futu NiuNiu | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile |
| Markets Offered | Stocks, Etf, Options, Futures, Crypto | Stocks, Etf, Options, Indices |
Trading & non-trading fees
Min Deposit
Futu (Moomoo)
$0
Longbridge
$0
Spreads From
Futu (Moomoo)
0 pips
Longbridge
0 pips
Commission
Futu (Moomoo)
None
Longbridge
None
Deposit Fees
Futu (Moomoo)
None
Longbridge
None
Withdrawal Fees
Futu (Moomoo)
None
Longbridge
None
Pros & cons
F(
Futu (Moomoo)
Pros
- Holds three tier-1 regulatory licences for stronger investor protection
- Zero-dollar minimum deposit removes barriers to entry
- No commission charges and spreads starting from 0 pips
- Broadest market access of the two, including crypto and futures
- Longer operating history dating back to 2012
- No deposit or withdrawal fees on the account
Cons
- Maximum leverage capped at 1:5, which may limit advanced traders
- Community and social trading features may feel overwhelming to some new users
- Futu NiuNiu branding can cause confusion for first-time users unfamiliar with the Moomoo rebrand
- Product depth in futures and crypto may still lag dedicated specialist platforms
L
Longbridge
Pros
- Zero-dollar minimum deposit makes it easy to start
- No commission charges with tight spreads from 0 pips
- Regulated by two respected authorities, SFC and MAS
- Clean, dedicated proprietary web and mobile platforms
- No deposit or withdrawal fees to worry about
Cons
- Fewer regulatory licences than Futu (Moomoo), with no SEC oversight
- Narrower market range with no futures or crypto access
- Newer broker, founded in 2019, with a shorter track record
- Proprietary-only platform ecosystem limits third-party tool integration
- Lower overall rating (3.4/5) compared to Futu (Moomoo)'s 3.7/5
Our expert verdict
Editor's verdict
Overall winner Futu (Moomoo)
Lowest fees Futu (Moomoo)
Best regulation Futu (Moomoo)
Better for beginners Futu (Moomoo)
Futu (Moomoo) is our overall winner, scoring 3.7/5 against Longbridge's 3.4/5 on our proprietary rating system. The edge comes down to three tier-1 regulatory licences (SFC, SEC, MAS) versus Longbridge's two (SFC, MAS), plus a broader market suite that includes crypto and futures alongside stocks, ETFs, and options. Longbridge remains a credible alternative for traders who value its proprietary platform interface, but for most investors — especially beginners prioritizing safety and low costs — Futu (Moomoo) is the stronger overall package.
Regulation & Safety
Regulatory strength is the single biggest differentiator in this matchup. Futu (Moomoo) is licensed by the SFC in Hong Kong, the SEC in the United States, and the MAS in Singapore — three tier-1 regulators spanning three major financial jurisdictions.
Longbridge, by comparison, holds licences from just the SFC and MAS. While both are respected regulators in Asia, Longbridge lacks the additional SEC oversight that gives Futu (Moomoo) a broader compliance footprint and added credibility for US-facing investors.
For traders who prioritize regulatory redundancy and cross-border oversight, Futu (Moomoo)'s three-license structure provides a meaningful safety margin. This is a core reason Futu (Moomoo) claims our 'Best for Regulation' award in this comparison.
Fees, Spreads & Costs
Both brokers advertise spreads starting from 0 pips and charge no commission on trades, making this a genuinely tight contest on headline pricing. Neither platform charges deposit or withdrawal fees, which is a strong point for cost-conscious investors on both sides.
Minimum deposit requirements are identical at $0 for both brokers, meaning account accessibility is a non-issue in this comparison. Neither broker creates a barrier to entry based on capital requirements.
Where Futu (Moomoo) pulls ahead is in the overall value equation once regulation and market breadth are factored in — the raw spread and commission numbers alone don't fully capture the total cost-of-ownership picture, since narrower market access on Longbridge may force some traders to maintain accounts elsewhere.
Trading Platforms & Tools
Futu (Moomoo) trades through its own Moomoo and Futu NiuNiu apps, both of which have built a reputation for slick charting, community-driven features, and real-time market data integration aimed at active retail traders.
Longbridge relies on a Proprietary Web and Proprietary Mobile platform pairing, offering a clean and functional experience but with a smaller third-party ecosystem and less brand recognition among global retail traders.
Traders who lean heavily on mobile-first execution and social/community trading features will likely find Moomoo's app ecosystem more mature, while Longbridge's proprietary tools remain a serviceable, no-frills alternative.
Market Access & Product Range
Futu (Moomoo) supports a wider array of asset classes: stocks, ETFs, options, futures, and crypto. This breadth suits traders who want to diversify across asset types without opening a second brokerage account.
Longbridge covers stocks, ETFs, options, and indices, but notably lacks futures and crypto trading. This narrower product range may be a limiting factor for more active or diversified traders.
For buy-and-hold equity and ETF investors, either broker's core offering may suffice, but Futu (Moomoo)'s inclusion of crypto and futures gives it a clear edge for traders wanting an all-in-one platform.
Company History & Track Record
Futu (Moomoo) was founded in 2012 and is headquartered in Hong Kong, China, giving it roughly seven additional years of operating history compared to Longbridge, which launched in 2019.
A longer track record generally translates into more refined infrastructure, deeper liquidity relationships, and more battle-tested compliance processes — all of which matter during periods of market volatility.
Longbridge, while newer, is headquartered in Hong Kong as well and has moved quickly to build out its proprietary technology stack, but it simply hasn't had the same multi-cycle market exposure that Futu (Moomoo) has accumulated since 2012.
Our Verdict
Futu (Moomoo) is the clear winner in this comparison, backed by a stronger regulatory profile, broader market access, and a longer operational history. It earns our 'Best Overall', 'Best for Beginners', 'Best for Low Fees', and 'Best for Regulation' awards in this matchup.
Longbridge is not a bad broker by any means — its zero-commission, zero-minimum-deposit structure is genuinely competitive, and its proprietary platforms are functional for straightforward stock and ETF trading.
However, for traders who want maximum regulatory coverage, a wider product suite including crypto and futures, and a more established brand, Futu (Moomoo) is the more complete choice for the majority of investors in 2026.
Verdict summary
The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.
Editor's verdict
Futu (Moomoo) wins overall
Futu (Moomoo) edges out Longbridge overall based on our expert rating score.
F(
Highest Rated
Futu (Moomoo)
3.7 / 5 / 5
Category winners
Overall winner
Based on overall expert rating (3.7/5).
Futu (Moomoo)Better for beginners
Stronger onboarding and educational resources.
Futu (Moomoo)Lower trading costs
More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.
Futu (Moomoo)Stronger regulation
Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.
Futu (Moomoo)
Frequently asked questions
Based on our independent proprietary rating, Futu (Moomoo) scores 3.7 out of 5 while Longbridge scores 3.4 out of 5. The gap is driven primarily by Futu (Moomoo)'s broader regulatory coverage and wider market access, though your ideal choice still depends on which specific markets and platform style you prefer.
Both brokers advertise spreads starting from 0 pips and charge no commissions, making them very closely matched on headline pricing. Neither platform charges deposit or withdrawal fees, so the cost difference in practice is minimal for most everyday trading activity.
Both Futu (Moomoo) and Longbridge require a $0 minimum deposit, meaning you can open and fund an account with virtually no upfront capital barrier. This makes both platforms accessible to beginner investors just starting out.
Futu (Moomoo) is regulated by three tier-1 authorities — the SFC, SEC, and MAS — while Longbridge is regulated by two, the SFC and MAS. The additional SEC oversight gives Futu (Moomoo) a broader compliance footprint, which is why it earns our 'Best for Regulation' award.
Futu (Moomoo) offers its own Moomoo and Futu NiuNiu apps, both known for active-trader features and social/community tools. Longbridge provides a Proprietary Web and Proprietary Mobile platform pairing that is simpler but has a smaller feature ecosystem.
Futu (Moomoo) supports stocks, ETFs, options, futures, and crypto, giving it the more comprehensive asset lineup. Longbridge covers stocks, ETFs, options, and indices, but currently does not offer futures or crypto trading.
Yes, there is nothing preventing you from maintaining accounts at both brokers simultaneously. Many traders diversify across multiple platforms to access different markets, tools, or regional advantages.
Futu (Moomoo) was founded in 2012, giving it roughly seven more years of market experience than Longbridge, which launched in 2019. A longer operating history often correlates with more mature infrastructure and compliance processes.
Both brokers cap maximum leverage at 1:5, so there is no meaningful difference between them on this specific metric. Traders seeking higher leverage products may need to look beyond either platform.
Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.