FXCM
A long-established, commission-free broker built for traders who want simplicity and proven reliability.
- Min deposit
- $50
- Max leverage
- 1:400
- Spread from
- 0.2 pips
- Regulators
- FCA, ASIC
FXCM and Aetos Capital both hold tier-1 regulation, but they take very different approaches to fees, platforms, and market access. Our proprietary rating puts FXCM ahead overall at 3.7/5, while Aetos Capital counters with tighter raw spreads and higher leverage.
A long-established, commission-free broker built for traders who want simplicity and proven reliability.
A leverage-friendly, multi-asset broker offering razor-thin spreads for cost-conscious active traders.
Core features compared head-to-head.
| Feature | F FXCM | AC Aetos Capital |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.7 / 5 | 3.4 / 5 |
| Founded | 1999 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | London, UK | Sydney, Australia |
| Regulation | FCA, ASIC | ASIC, FCA |
| Fees & Limits | ||
| Min Deposit | $50 | $50 |
| Spreads From | 0.2 pips | 0 pips |
| Commission | None | $3.5/lot |
| Max Leverage | 1:400 | 1:500 |
| Platforms & Markets | ||
| Trading Platforms | MT4, Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile | MT4, MT5 |
| Markets Offered | Forex, Cfd, Indices, Commodities | Forex, Cfd, Indices, Commodities, Crypto |
FXCM
$50
Aetos Capital
$50
FXCM
0.2 pips
Aetos Capital
0 pips
FXCM
None
Aetos Capital
$3.5/lot
FXCM
None
Aetos Capital
None
FXCM
None
Aetos Capital
None
FXCM is the stronger all-around broker, earning a 3.7/5 on our rating versus Aetos Capital's 3.4/5, thanks to its longer track record, commission-free pricing, and broader platform lineup. That said, Aetos Capital wins on raw pricing with 0.0 pip spreads and offers higher leverage up to 1:500, making it appealing to cost-sensitive scalpers and crypto CFD traders. Most traders will get a better all-round experience with FXCM, but Aetos Capital remains a legitimate niche pick.
Both brokers operate under tier-1 oversight, giving traders a comparable baseline of trust. FXCM is regulated by the FCA and ASIC, while Aetos Capital holds licences from ASIC and the FCA as well, meaning both fall under equally strict regulatory regimes.
FXCM's longer operating history since 1999 gives it an extra 14 years of market presence compared to Aetos Capital, founded in 2013. Longevity alone doesn't guarantee safety, but it does reflect a sustained ability to navigate multiple market cycles and regulatory changes.
Neither broker charges deposit or withdrawal fees, which is a positive baseline for cost transparency on both sides. Overall, we consider regulation a near-tie, with FXCM holding a slight edge due to its established history and headquarters in London, a major financial hub.
This is where the two brokers diverge most clearly. Aetos Capital advertises spreads from 0.0 pips, undercutting FXCM's 0.2 pip starting spread, but this comes with a $3.5 per lot commission attached to its pricing model.
FXCM, by contrast, charges no per-trade commission at all, folding its costs entirely into the 0.2 pip spread. For lower-frequency traders or those trading smaller position sizes, FXCM's simpler all-in spread can actually work out cheaper once commissions are factored in.
High-volume or scalping-focused traders who can absorb the commission may still prefer Aetos Capital's tighter raw spread, especially on major forex pairs. Ultimately, the right fee structure depends heavily on your trading frequency and average lot size.
FXCM supports three platform options: MT4 alongside its own Proprietary Web and Proprietary Mobile applications. This gives traders flexibility to choose between the familiar MetaTrader ecosystem and FXCM's in-house tools.
Aetos Capital keeps things simpler with MT4 and MT5 support only. MT5 is a meaningful addition since it offers more timeframes, an economic calendar, and improved order types compared to MT4.
Traders who value proprietary charting tools and mobile-first design may lean toward FXCM, while those who prefer the depth of MT5's native features will find Aetos Capital's lineup sufficient despite having fewer total platform choices.
Aetos Capital offers higher maximum leverage at 1:500 compared to FXCM's 1:400 cap. Aggressive traders seeking greater capital efficiency may find this appealing, though higher leverage always carries increased risk.
Market access also favors Aetos Capital slightly, with five asset classes available — Forex, CFDs, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto — versus FXCM's four, which excludes crypto entirely.
For traders who want exposure to digital assets alongside traditional forex and CFD products, Aetos Capital's broader market menu is a genuine differentiator that FXCM currently cannot match.
Both brokers set an identical minimum deposit requirement of $50, making them equally accessible to new traders working with smaller starting capital.
Neither broker imposes deposit or withdrawal fees, so account funding costs are effectively a wash between the two. This levels the playing field for beginners weighing which broker to fund first.
Given the identical entry cost, the deciding factor for most newer traders will come down to platform preference and desired market access rather than account minimums.
FXCM earns our recommendation as the stronger overall broker, scoring 3.7/5 against Aetos Capital's 3.4/5 on our independent rating system. Its commission-free pricing, longer operating history, and wider platform selection make it the safer default choice for most traders.
Aetos Capital isn't a poor alternative by any means — its tighter spreads, higher leverage, and crypto market access make it a strong niche pick for cost-conscious or high-frequency traders who want broader asset coverage.
Ultimately, choose FXCM if you want a well-rounded, established broker with simple pricing, and choose Aetos Capital if raw spread cost, leverage, and crypto CFD access matter more to your strategy.
The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.
FXCM edges out Aetos Capital overall based on our expert rating score.
Highest Rated
FXCM
3.7 / 5 / 5
Category winners
Overall winner
Based on overall expert rating (3.7/5).
Better for beginners
Stronger onboarding and educational resources.
Lower trading costs
More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.
Stronger regulation
Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.
Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.