HFM
Aggressive leverage and multi-jurisdictional regulation built for active global traders.
- Min deposit
- $5
- Max leverage
- 1:2000
- Spread from
- 0 pips
- Regulators
- FCA, CySEC, FSCA
HFM and Fidelity serve very different types of traders, but only one comes out on top in our independent scoring. HFM edges ahead with a 3.8/5 rating thanks to tighter spreads, deeper regulation, and broader market access, while Fidelity remains a strong pick for cost-conscious stock investors starting with zero capital.
Aggressive leverage and multi-jurisdictional regulation built for active global traders.
A trusted, zero-commission US brokerage giant built for long-term investors.
Core features compared head-to-head.
| Feature | H HFM | F Fidelity |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.8 / 5 | 3.6 / 5 |
| Founded | 2010 | 1946 |
| Headquarters | Limassol, Cyprus | Boston, USA |
| Regulation | FCA, CySEC, FSCA | SEC, CFTC |
| Fees & Limits | ||
| Min Deposit | $5 | $0 |
| Spreads From | 0 pips | 0 pips |
| Commission | $3/lot | None |
| Max Leverage | 1:2000 | 1:2 |
| Platforms & Markets | ||
| Trading Platforms | MT4, MT5, Proprietary Mobile | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile |
| Markets Offered | Forex, Cfd, Stocks, Indices, Commodities, Crypto | Stocks, Indices, Commodities |
HFM
$5
Fidelity
$0
HFM
0 pips
Fidelity
0 pips
HFM
$3/lot
Fidelity
None
HFM
None
Fidelity
None
HFM
None
Fidelity
None
HFM is our recommended pick overall, scoring 3.8/5 versus Fidelity's 3.6/5 on our proprietary rating system. HFM wins on regulatory breadth, leverage flexibility, and market variety, making it the stronger all-around choice for active traders. Fidelity still holds appeal for beginner investors who want a $0 minimum deposit and a long-established US brand, but it lags behind in leverage, platform variety, and instrument range.
HFM is regulated by three separate authorities — the FCA, CySEC, and FSCA — giving it a broader international regulatory footprint that spans Europe, the UK, and Africa. This multi-jurisdictional oversight is a meaningful advantage for traders who value layered compliance and access to segregated client fund protections across different legal frameworks.
Fidelity, on the other hand, operates under the SEC and CFTC, both highly respected US regulators known for strict enforcement standards. While Fidelity holds fewer total licences, the depth and reputation of US regulation carries significant weight, especially for American-based investors prioritizing domestic oversight.
Our rating system scores HFM slightly higher here due to the sheer number of licences and cross-border coverage, which benefits traders operating internationally. Fidelity remains a very safe choice, but its regulatory scope is narrower and US-centric.
Both brokers advertise spreads starting from 0 pips, making them competitive on paper for tight-spread trading. However, HFM applies a modest $3 per lot commission on certain account types, while Fidelity charges no per-trade commission at all, which is a clear win for cost-conscious equity investors.
Neither broker charges deposit or withdrawal fees, which keeps the overall cost of moving money in and out fairly transparent on both sides. This parity means the real differentiator comes down to trading style rather than account maintenance costs.
For high-frequency forex and CFD traders, HFM's structure with commission-based pricing on tight spreads can still work out cheaper than wider all-in spreads elsewhere. Fidelity's zero-commission model is better suited to buy-and-hold stock investors rather than active leveraged traders.
Fidelity requires no minimum deposit whatsoever, making it exceptionally accessible for beginners or those testing the waters with a small amount of capital. This $0 threshold removes a major barrier to entry for new investors who want to start small.
HFM requires a minimum deposit of just $5, which is still remarkably low compared to industry averages and barely a barrier for most traders. The small gap between the two brokers here is largely symbolic rather than practically significant.
For traders prioritizing near-zero entry costs, Fidelity technically wins this category outright. That said, HFM's $5 threshold is low enough that it rarely factors into a serious decision-making process.
HFM offers leverage up to an aggressive 1:2000, dramatically higher than Fidelity's conservative 1:2 cap. This makes HFM the clear choice for forex and CFD traders who rely on leverage to maximize capital efficiency on smaller account sizes.
In terms of market variety, HFM supports six asset classes — Forex, CFDs, Stocks, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto — while Fidelity is limited to Stocks, Indices, and Commodities. This broader range gives HFM traders far more flexibility to diversify across asset types under one account.
Fidelity's low leverage reflects its identity as a traditional US brokerage built around long-term equity investing rather than short-term leveraged speculation. Traders seeking crypto or forex exposure will find HFM to be the only viable option between the two.
HFM supports the industry-standard MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 platforms alongside a proprietary mobile app, giving traders access to advanced charting, automated trading via Expert Advisors, and a massive ecosystem of third-party tools. This platform flexibility appeals strongly to experienced forex and CFD traders.
Fidelity relies on its own proprietary web and mobile platforms, which are well-designed for stock research, retirement planning, and long-term portfolio management. However, they lack the algorithmic trading and customization depth that MT4/MT5 offer.
Traders who value automation, custom indicators, or multi-broker compatibility will likely prefer HFM's platform ecosystem. Fidelity's tools are better suited to fundamental research and passive investing rather than active technical trading.
Fidelity brings unmatched institutional pedigree, having been founded in 1946 and operating out of Boston, USA for nearly eight decades. This long track record provides a strong sense of stability and trust for conservative, long-term investors.
HFM is comparatively newer, founded in 2010 and headquartered in Limassol, Cyprus, but has built a solid international reputation within the retail forex and CFD space over more than a decade of operation. Its growth has been centered on serving global retail traders rather than domestic US retirement accounts.
Ultimately, both companies bring credible histories to the table, just for very different trader profiles. Fidelity suits legacy, buy-and-hold investors, while HFM caters to a more active, globally distributed trading audience.
The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.
HFM edges out Fidelity overall based on our expert rating score.
Highest Rated
HFM
3.8 / 5 / 5
Category winners
Overall winner
Based on overall expert rating (3.8/5).
Better for beginners
Stronger onboarding and educational resources.
Lower trading costs
More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.
Stronger regulation
Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.
Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.