IC Markets
Raw ECN-style pricing with spreads from 0.0 pips built for serious, high-frequency traders.
- Min deposit
- $200
- Max leverage
- 1:500
- Spread from
- 0 pips
- Regulators
- ASIC, CySEC
IC Markets and HYCM are both established, well-regulated forex and CFD brokers, but they serve different types of traders. Our proprietary rating gives IC Markets the edge overall at 3.9/5 versus HYCM's 3.4/5, largely on the back of tighter spreads and a broader platform suite. Read on to see exactly where each broker pulls ahead.
Raw ECN-style pricing with spreads from 0.0 pips built for serious, high-frequency traders.
A veteran London-based broker offering commission-free trading with a low $100 entry point.
Core features compared head-to-head.
| Feature | IM IC Markets | H HYCM |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.9 / 5 | 3.4 / 5 |
| Founded | 2007 | 1977 |
| Headquarters | Sydney, Australia | London, UK |
| Regulation | ASIC, CySEC | FCA, CySEC, DFSA |
| Fees & Limits | ||
| Min Deposit | $200 | $100 |
| Spreads From | 0 pips | 0.2 pips |
| Commission | $3.5/lot | None |
| Max Leverage | 1:500 | 1:500 |
| Platforms & Markets | ||
| Trading Platforms | MT4, MT5, TradingView, Proprietary Mobile | MT4, MT5 |
| Markets Offered | Forex, Cfd, Crypto, Stocks, Indices, Commodities | Forex, Cfd, Stocks, Indices, Commodities, Crypto |
IC Markets
$200
HYCM
$100
IC Markets
0 pips
HYCM
0.2 pips
IC Markets
$3.5/lot
HYCM
None
IC Markets
None
HYCM
None
IC Markets
None
HYCM
None
IC Markets is our top pick in this matchup, earning a 3.9/5 overall rating compared to HYCM's 3.4/5. Its razor-thin spreads from 0.0 pips, deeper platform lineup (including TradingView), and raw ECN-style pricing make it the stronger all-round choice for active traders. HYCM still deserves a look from beginners and low-budget traders thanks to its $100 minimum deposit, commission-free pricing, and wide multi-jurisdictional regulatory footprint spanning the FCA, CySEC, and DFSA.
Both brokers operate under credible, tier-1 regulatory oversight, so neither can be dismissed as a safety risk. IC Markets is licensed by ASIC in Australia and CySEC in Cyprus, two of the most respected regulators in the retail trading world.
HYCM goes a step further on jurisdictional spread, holding licences from the FCA in the UK, CySEC in Cyprus, and the DFSA in Dubai. This gives HYCM a slightly wider regulatory net, which matters for traders who value operating under multiple overlapping legal frameworks.
For traders prioritising sheer regulatory breadth, HYCM has a marginal advantage with three licences versus two. However, both brokers meet the standards most serious retail traders require for fund safety and operational transparency.
This is where the comparison becomes most decisive. IC Markets advertises spreads from 0.0 pips, paired with a transparent commission of $3.5 per lot, a pricing model typical of raw ECN-style accounts favoured by scalpers and high-frequency traders.
HYCM takes a different approach, charging no per-trade commission but starting spreads slightly wider at 0.2 pips. For lower-frequency traders, this simpler all-in-spread model can feel more predictable, even if the effective cost per trade may end up higher for active traders.
Neither broker charges deposit or withdrawal fees, which is a welcome consistency across both platforms. On raw cost efficiency for high-volume trading, IC Markets comes out ahead, while HYCM's commission-free structure suits traders who prefer simplicity over granular cost-cutting.
HYCM is the more accessible option for traders working with smaller starting capital, requiring just a $100 minimum deposit. IC Markets sets its entry point higher at $200, which may be a modest barrier for absolute beginners or those testing strategies with limited funds.
Both brokers offer 1:500 maximum leverage, giving traders comparable flexibility to scale position sizes relative to their account equity, subject to regional regulatory restrictions.
For newer traders or those funding a demo-to-live transition cautiously, HYCM's lower deposit threshold removes friction. Traders with more capital ready to deploy immediately may find IC Markets' $200 requirement negligible in the context of overall trading costs.
IC Markets supports a notably wider platform ecosystem: MT4, MT5, TradingView, and a proprietary mobile app. The TradingView integration is a standout, giving traders access to advanced charting and social trading features not natively available at HYCM.
HYCM keeps things focused with MT4 and MT5 only. While this covers the two most widely used retail trading platforms globally, it lacks the extra flexibility and modern charting depth that TradingView brings to IC Markets' offering.
Traders who rely heavily on custom indicators, algorithmic strategies, or multi-device charting will likely prefer IC Markets' broader toolkit. Those who are comfortable with the standard MetaTrader suite will find HYCM's simpler setup perfectly functional.
HYCM brings considerable pedigree to the table, founded in 1977 and headquartered in London, making it one of the more historically established names in retail trading. IC Markets is comparatively younger, founded in 2007 and based in Sydney, Australia.
Despite the age gap, both brokers offer comparably broad market access, spanning forex, CFDs, crypto, stocks, indices, and commodities. Neither broker meaningfully outpaces the other on asset diversity.
Longevity can matter to traders who weigh institutional track record heavily, giving HYCM a reputational edge in that specific regard. However, market range and execution quality remain broadly comparable between the two firms.
When we weigh all criteria together, IC Markets earns the higher overall rating at 3.9/5 versus HYCM's 3.4/5, primarily driven by tighter spreads, a stronger platform lineup, and cost efficiency for active traders. It is our pick for best overall broker and best for low fees in this comparison.
HYCM is not far behind and claims its own wins, taking our awards for best regulatory breadth and best for beginners thanks to its lower $100 minimum deposit and long operating history dating back to 1977.
Ultimately, high-frequency and cost-conscious traders should lean toward IC Markets, while beginners or those who value multi-jurisdictional regulatory coverage may find HYCM the more comfortable starting point.
The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.
IC Markets edges out HYCM overall based on our expert rating score.
Highest Rated
IC Markets
3.9 / 5 / 5
Category winners
Overall winner
Based on overall expert rating (3.9/5).
Better for beginners
Stronger onboarding and educational resources.
Lower trading costs
More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.
Stronger regulation
Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.
Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.