Phillip Capital
Nearly five decades of trust, backed by rock-bottom commissions and tier-1 regulation.
- Min deposit
- $0
- Max leverage
- 1:5
- Spread from
- 0 pips
- Regulators
- MAS, ASIC
Phillip Capital and Fineco Bank are both established, well-regulated brokers, but they serve different types of traders. Our independent research gives Phillip Capital the edge overall, with Fineco Bank remaining a strong pick for those prioritizing multi-jurisdictional regulation.
Nearly five decades of trust, backed by rock-bottom commissions and tier-1 regulation.
Broader market access and triple-jurisdiction regulation for traders who want it all in one account.
Core features compared head-to-head.
| Feature | PC Phillip Capital | FB Fineco Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.7 / 5 | 3.5 / 5 |
| Founded | 1975 | 1999 |
| Headquarters | Singapore | Milan, Italy |
| Regulation | MAS, ASIC | Consob, FCA, Banca d'Italia |
| Fees & Limits | ||
| Min Deposit | $0 | $0 |
| Spreads From | 0 pips | 0 pips |
| Commission | $0.08/lot | $2.95/lot |
| Max Leverage | 1:5 | 1:5 |
| Platforms & Markets | ||
| Trading Platforms | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile, PowerDesk |
| Markets Offered | Stocks, Forex, Cfd, Indices, Commodities | Stocks, Etf, Cfd, Forex, Crypto, Indices |
Phillip Capital
$0
Fineco Bank
$0
Phillip Capital
0 pips
Fineco Bank
0 pips
Phillip Capital
$0.08/lot
Fineco Bank
$2.95/lot
Phillip Capital
None
Fineco Bank
None
Phillip Capital
None
Fineco Bank
None
Phillip Capital is our top pick in this matchup, earning a 3.7/5 on our proprietary rating scale compared to Fineco Bank's 3.5/5. Phillip Capital's lower commission structure ($0.08/lot vs $2.95/lot) and tier-1 regulatory backing from MAS and ASIC give it a decisive edge for cost-conscious and safety-focused traders alike. Fineco Bank still holds its own with broader market access and more regulatory licences across Europe, making it a compelling alternative for traders who value jurisdictional diversity and an extra desktop platform option.
Regulation is often the single most important factor for traders choosing between two brokers, and this comparison highlights two genuinely different approaches to compliance. Phillip Capital operates under the oversight of MAS (Monetary Authority of Singapore) and ASIC (Australian Securities and Investments Commission), two of the most respected tier-1 regulators globally.
Fineco Bank, in contrast, holds licences from Consob, the FCA, and Banca d'Italia, giving it three separate regulatory registrations across Italy and the UK. This breadth of licensing means Fineco Bank technically covers more jurisdictions, which is reflected in its dedicated regulatory pros listing.
However, our overall rating still favors Phillip Capital's combination of MAS and ASIC oversight as offering a marginally stronger safety net for international traders, thanks to the strict capital adequacy and client fund segregation rules enforced by both regulators. Traders who specifically need EU or UK coverage may still lean toward Fineco Bank for peace of mind.
Both brokers advertise spreads starting from 0 pips, so headline pricing looks identical at first glance. The real differentiator emerges in commission structure: Phillip Capital charges just $0.08 per lot, while Fineco Bank charges $2.95 per lot — a substantial gap for active or high-volume traders.
Neither broker charges deposit or withdrawal fees, which is a welcome consistency for traders moving funds in and out of their accounts regularly. This removes one common source of hidden cost that frustrates traders at other platforms.
For frequent traders executing multiple lots per week, Phillip Capital's commission structure could translate into meaningfully lower total trading costs over a year. Fineco Bank's higher per-lot commission may still be justified for traders who value its broader asset menu and additional platform choice.
Phillip Capital keeps things streamlined with its Proprietary Web and Proprietary Mobile platforms, focusing on a clean, functional trading experience without excessive bells and whistles.
Fineco Bank goes a step further by offering three platform options: Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile, and the additional PowerDesk terminal. PowerDesk is generally aimed at more advanced traders who want deeper charting and order management tools beyond a standard web interface.
Traders who prioritize platform variety and desktop-grade tools may find Fineco Bank's PowerDesk a meaningful advantage, while those who prefer simplicity may find Phillip Capital's two-platform approach entirely sufficient for day-to-day trading needs.
Fineco Bank offers a wider net of tradable markets, covering Stocks, ETFs, CFDs, Forex, Crypto, and Indices — six asset classes in total. This crypto access in particular sets it apart from Phillip Capital's offering.
Phillip Capital covers Stocks, Forex, CFDs, Indices, and Commodities — five asset classes that omit both crypto and ETFs but add direct commodities exposure.
Traders wanting a one-stop shop that includes cryptocurrency alongside traditional instruments will likely gravitate toward Fineco Bank, while commodities-focused traders may prefer Phillip Capital's more targeted market lineup.
Longevity in the brokerage industry often correlates with stability, and Phillip Capital has a significant head start, having been founded in 1975 in Singapore. That's nearly 25 years longer in operation than Fineco Bank, which was established in 1999 in Milan, Italy.
Both firms are headquartered in major financial centers with strong institutional reputations in their respective regions, which lends credibility to each brand independently of the rating comparison.
This extended operating history is one of the specific factors contributing to Phillip Capital's higher pros count in our research, alongside its stronger overall rating score.
When weighing regulation, fees, platform choice, and market range together, Phillip Capital comes out ahead in our overall rating at 3.7/5 versus Fineco Bank's 3.5/5. The dramatically lower commission rate and tier-1 regulatory backing make it the stronger all-around choice for most traders in 2026.
That said, Fineco Bank remains a genuinely strong contender, particularly for traders who want crypto access, an extra desktop platform, or the reassurance of three separate European regulatory licences.
Ultimately, your decision should hinge on your specific priorities: choose Phillip Capital for lower costs and streamlined efficiency, or Fineco Bank for broader market access and regulatory diversity across jurisdictions.
The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.
Phillip Capital edges out Fineco Bank overall based on our expert rating score.
Highest Rated
Phillip Capital
3.7 / 5 / 5
Category winners
Overall winner
Based on overall expert rating (3.7/5).
Better for beginners
Stronger onboarding and educational resources.
Lower trading costs
More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.
Stronger regulation
Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.
Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.