Brokers Profile
Reviewed by Experts Updated 8/25/2026

Phillip Capital vs Phillip Nova: Which Singapore Broker Wins in 2026?

Phillip Capital and Phillip Nova are both Singapore-headquartered brokers, but they differ sharply on regulation, spreads, and leverage. Our 2026 comparison breaks down exactly which platform delivers better value depending on your trading priorities.

OVERALL WINNER
PC

Phillip Capital

3.7 / 5Score: 3 / 4

A century-adjacent legacy broker delivering tier-1 regulatory strength with zero-pip spreads for cost-conscious multi-asset traders.

Min deposit
$0
Max leverage
1:5
Spread from
0 pips
Regulators
MAS, ASIC
PN

Phillip Nova

3.4 / 5Score: 1 / 4

A flexible, higher-leverage trading gateway built for traders who want commission-free execution and broader platform choice.

Min deposit
$0
Max leverage
1:20
Spread from
0.6 pips
Regulators
MAS
Overall Winner
Phillip Capital
Best for Beginners
Phillip Capital
Lowest Fees
Phillip Capital
Top Regulation
Phillip Capital

Side-by-side comparison

Core features compared head-to-head.

Feature
PC
Phillip Capital
PN
Phillip Nova
Overview
Rating3.7 / 53.4 / 5
Founded19752005
HeadquartersSingaporeSingapore
RegulationMAS, ASICMAS
Fees & Limits
Min Deposit$0$0
Spreads From0 pips0.6 pips
Commission$0.08/lotNone
Max Leverage1:51:20
Platforms & Markets
Trading PlatformsProprietary Web, Proprietary MobileProprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile, POEMS
Markets OfferedStocks, Forex, Cfd, Indices, CommoditiesForex, Cfd, Indices, Commodities, Crypto

Trading & non-trading fees

Min Deposit

Phillip Capital

$0

Phillip Nova

$0

Spreads From

Phillip Capital

0 pips

Phillip Nova

0.6 pips

Commission

Phillip Capital

$0.08/lot

Phillip Nova

None

Deposit Fees

Phillip Capital

None

Phillip Nova

None

Withdrawal Fees

Phillip Capital

None

Phillip Nova

None

Pros & cons

PC

Phillip Capital

Pros

  • Backed by nearly five decades of operating history since 1975, signaling long-term stability
  • Holds two respected regulatory licences (MAS and ASIC) rather than a single jurisdiction
  • Spreads from 0 pips give active traders a meaningful cost advantage over time
  • Transparent low commission of just $0.08 per lot with no hidden deposit or withdrawal charges
  • No minimum deposit threshold makes the broker accessible to traders at any capital level
  • Diversified market access across five asset classes including stocks, a rarity among CFD-focused brokers
  • Higher overall independent rating of 3.7/5 reflecting stronger all-round performance

Cons

  • Maximum leverage is capped at just 1:5, notably lower than many competitors including Phillip Nova
  • Platform selection is limited to proprietary web and mobile, with no MetaTrader or POEMS access
  • No cryptocurrency market access, unlike Phillip Nova's broader offering
  • Conservative leverage may frustrate short-term traders seeking higher capital efficiency
  • Proprietary-only platform ecosystem may not suit traders wanting third-party charting integrations
PN

Phillip Nova

Pros

  • No per-trade commission simplifies cost calculations for frequent traders
  • Higher leverage ceiling of 1:20 offers greater capital efficiency than Phillip Capital's 1:5
  • Widest platform selection of the two brokers, including the dedicated POEMS system
  • Cryptocurrency access broadens the tradable universe beyond traditional asset classes
  • Zero minimum deposit keeps the barrier to entry low for new traders
  • Established Singapore headquarters since 2005 with a regional reputation

Cons

  • Single regulatory licence (MAS only) offers narrower oversight than Phillip Capital's dual-regulation setup
  • Wider spreads starting from 0.6 pips increase trading costs versus Phillip Capital's 0 pips
  • Lower overall independent rating of 3.4/5 versus Phillip Capital's 3.7/5
  • No direct stock market access, unlike Phillip Capital's broader equities offering
  • Higher leverage on offer can amplify losses as much as gains for undisciplined traders

Our expert verdict

Editor's verdict

Overall winner Phillip Capital
Lowest fees Phillip Capital
Best regulation Phillip Capital
Better for beginners Phillip Capital

Phillip Capital is our recommended pick, scoring 3.7/5 versus Phillip Nova's 3.4/5 on our independent rating scale. It wins on regulatory strength with dual MAS and ASIC licensing, and on cost with spreads from 0 pips versus 0.6 pips. Phillip Nova remains a credible alternative for traders prioritizing higher leverage, crypto access, or the POEMS platform.

Regulation & Safety

Phillip Capital holds licences from both MAS in Singapore and ASIC in Australia, giving it dual tier-1 regulatory coverage. This dual oversight structure typically means stricter capital adequacy requirements and more robust client fund segregation rules across two major jurisdictions.

Phillip Nova, by contrast, operates under a single MAS licence. While MAS is a well-respected regulator in its own right, relying on one jurisdiction offers less redundancy than Phillip Capital's two-licence structure.

For traders who weigh regulatory strength heavily in their broker selection, Phillip Capital's broader licensing footprint is a clear differentiator and a primary reason it earns our 'Best for Regulation' award.

Fees, Spreads & Commissions

Cost efficiency is one of the starkest differences in this matchup. Phillip Capital offers spreads from 0 pips paired with a low flat commission of $0.08 per lot, while Phillip Nova offers commission-free trading but with wider spreads starting at 0.6 pips.

For high-frequency or volume-based traders, Phillip Capital's near-zero spread structure combined with its modest per-lot fee is likely to produce lower total trading costs over time. Phillip Nova's zero-commission model may appeal more to traders who value fee simplicity over raw spread tightness.

Neither broker charges deposit or withdrawal fees, and both maintain a $0 minimum deposit requirement, so funding costs and entry barriers are effectively neutral between the two.

Trading Platforms & Tools

Phillip Capital keeps things streamlined with Proprietary Web and Proprietary Mobile platforms only. This simplicity suits traders who want a clean, no-frills interface without needing to navigate multiple software ecosystems.

Phillip Nova goes a step further by also offering POEMS, its dedicated proprietary system, in addition to the standard web and mobile options. This gives Phillip Nova a slight edge in platform variety for traders who want more tool choice.

Neither broker currently offers third-party platforms like MetaTrader 4 or 5, which may be a limiting factor for traders accustomed to those industry-standard charting and automation ecosystems.

Leverage & Market Access

Phillip Nova offers considerably higher maximum leverage at 1:20 compared to Phillip Capital's more conservative 1:5 cap. Traders seeking greater capital efficiency on smaller account sizes may find Phillip Nova's leverage terms more attractive.

On market breadth, Phillip Capital includes direct stock trading alongside forex, CFDs, indices, and commodities, while Phillip Nova swaps stocks for cryptocurrency access instead.

The choice here largely comes down to individual strategy: equities-focused traders will lean toward Phillip Capital, while those wanting crypto exposure or higher leverage will find Phillip Nova's structure more accommodating.

Company Background & Track Record

Phillip Capital was founded in 1975, giving it nearly five decades of operating history and a well-established reputation in the Singapore financial services landscape. Its longevity often translates into deeper institutional infrastructure and broader financial resources.

Phillip Nova, founded in 2005, is comparatively newer but still carries three decades of shared heritage given its association with the wider Phillip group of companies. Both brokers are headquartered in Singapore.

Track record and history aren't everything, but for risk-averse traders, Phillip Capital's longer operating tenure adds an extra layer of confidence.

Our Verdict

Taking regulation, fees, and overall rating together, Phillip Capital comes out ahead with a 3.7/5 score versus Phillip Nova's 3.4/5. It's the stronger all-round choice for most traders, particularly those prioritizing regulatory safety and lower trading costs.

That said, Phillip Nova isn't a poor choice — its higher leverage, crypto market access, and additional POEMS platform make it a legitimate option for traders with those specific priorities.

Ultimately, both brokers share the same Singapore roots and zero minimum deposit accessibility, so the decision comes down to whether you value tighter spreads and dual regulation (Phillip Capital) or higher leverage and platform variety (Phillip Nova).

Verdict summary

The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.

Editor's verdict

Phillip Capital wins overall

Phillip Capital edges out Phillip Nova overall based on our expert rating score.

PC

Highest Rated

Phillip Capital

3.7 / 5 / 5

Visit Phillip Capital

Category winners

  • Overall winner

    Based on overall expert rating (3.7/5).

    Phillip Capital
  • Better for beginners

    Stronger onboarding and educational resources.

    Phillip Capital
  • Lower trading costs

    More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.

    Phillip Capital
  • Stronger regulation

    Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.

    Phillip Capital

Frequently asked questions

Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

BP AI