Phillip Nova
Commission-free multi-asset trading with higher leverage for traders who want simplicity without sacrificing flexibility.
- Min deposit
- $0
- Max leverage
- 1:20
- Spread from
- 0.6 pips
- Regulators
- MAS
Phillip Nova and UOB Kay Hian are two established Singapore-based brokers vying for the attention of local and regional traders. Phillip Nova edges ahead overall with a 3.4/5 rating, while UOB Kay Hian counters with tighter spreads and broader regulatory coverage. This comparison breaks down exactly where each platform shines.
Commission-free multi-asset trading with higher leverage for traders who want simplicity without sacrificing flexibility.
Tight institutional-grade spreads backed by dual tier-1 regulation for cost-conscious, compliance-focused traders.
Same category, top-tier regulation, and it's currently accepting new traders.
See What Makes It DifferentCore features compared head-to-head.
| Feature | PN Phillip Nova | UK UOB Kay Hian |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.4 / 5 | 3.3 / 5 |
| Founded | 2005 | 1973 |
| Headquarters | Singapore | Singapore |
| Regulation | MAS | MAS, SFC |
| Fees & Limits | ||
| Min Deposit | $0 | $0 |
| Spreads From | 0.6 pips | 0 pips |
| Commission | None | $0.18/lot |
| Max Leverage | 1:20 | 1:5 |
| Platforms & Markets | ||
| Trading Platforms | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile, POEMS | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile, UTRADE |
| Markets Offered | Forex, Cfd, Indices, Commodities, Crypto | Stocks, Etf, Indices, Forex |
Phillip Nova
$0
UOB Kay Hian
$0
Phillip Nova
0.6 pips
UOB Kay Hian
0 pips
Phillip Nova
None
UOB Kay Hian
$0.18/lot
Phillip Nova
None
UOB Kay Hian
None
Phillip Nova
None
UOB Kay Hian
None
Phillip Nova is the better all-round choice for most traders, scoring 3.4/5 against UOB Kay Hian's 3.3/5 on our independent rating. Phillip Nova wins on commission-free trading, higher leverage, and broader market access, making it our pick for Best Overall and Best for Beginners. However, UOB Kay Hian fights back with 0.0 pip spreads and dual MAS/SFC regulation, earning it our awards for Best for Low Fees and Best for Regulation. Cost-focused traders who value regulatory breadth over sheer convenience may still find UOB Kay Hian the smarter fit.
On our independent rating system, Phillip Nova scores 3.4/5 compared to UOB Kay Hian's 3.3/5 — a narrow but consistent lead across our testing criteria. Both brokers are long-standing Singapore institutions, but they come from different corporate lineages: Phillip Nova via the Phillip Securities group, and UOB Kay Hian as the brokerage arm of a major Singaporean banking group.
The gap between the two is small enough that either broker is a defensible choice, but Phillip Nova's slightly broader feature set tips the scale. UOB Kay Hian's century-spanning heritage (founded 1973) versus Phillip Nova's 2005 founding does give it an edge in sheer institutional longevity, which may matter to more conservative investors.
This is where UOB Kay Hian pulls ahead decisively. It advertises spreads from 0.0 pips, undercutting Phillip Nova's starting spread of 0.6 pips. However, UOB Kay Hian offsets this with a per-lot commission of $0.18, whereas Phillip Nova charges no commission at all on its trades.
For high-frequency or high-volume traders, UOB Kay Hian's tighter raw spreads combined with its small commission can still work out cheaper overall. Casual or lower-volume traders, however, may prefer Phillip Nova's simpler, commission-free pricing structure since there's no need to calculate per-lot costs on every transaction.
Neither broker charges deposit or withdrawal fees, which is a welcome parity that keeps account funding and cash-out costs neutral in this comparison. Both also require a $0 minimum deposit, removing barriers to entry for new account holders.
Both brokers operate under tier-1 oversight, giving traders confidence that client funds and trading conduct are held to strict standards. Phillip Nova is regulated solely by Singapore's Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), while UOB Kay Hian holds the same MAS licence plus an additional Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) licence from Hong Kong.
This dual-jurisdiction coverage gives UOB Kay Hian a regulatory breadth advantage, which is particularly relevant for traders who operate across both Singapore and Hong Kong markets or who simply prefer brokers with multiple regulatory bodies monitoring their operations.
Phillip Nova's single MAS licence is still a highly respected tier-1 regulatory framework, and for traders focused purely on the Singapore market, this alone provides ample protection and oversight.
Phillip Nova offers its Proprietary Web and Proprietary Mobile platforms alongside POEMS, its flagship in-house trading suite built for multi-asset access. UOB Kay Hian similarly provides Proprietary Web and Proprietary Mobile options, paired with its own UTRADE platform.
Both brokers rely on proprietary technology rather than third-party platforms like MetaTrader, which means traders should expect a more bank-style, structured interface rather than the highly customizable charting environments found elsewhere. POEMS and UTRADE both support order management and portfolio tracking suited to their respective product ranges.
Neither platform suite stands out as dramatically superior — the choice largely comes down to which proprietary ecosystem aligns better with a trader's existing brokerage relationships or asset focus.
Phillip Nova offers considerably higher maximum leverage at 1:20, compared to UOB Kay Hian's more conservative 1:5 cap. For traders who want more flexibility in position sizing, Phillip Nova's higher ceiling provides greater capital efficiency, albeit with correspondingly higher risk.
Market access also favors Phillip Nova slightly, with coverage across Forex, CFDs, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto — five distinct asset classes. UOB Kay Hian focuses more on traditional instruments: Stocks, ETFs, Indices, and Forex, which suits investors more interested in equities and fund-based products than derivatives or digital assets.
Traders whose strategies depend on crypto or commodity CFD exposure will find Phillip Nova the more capable platform, while long-term equity and ETF investors may lean toward UOB Kay Hian's stock-centric offering.
Phillip Nova takes the overall win thanks to its commission-free structure, higher leverage ceiling, and wider range of tradable markets, backed by a 3.4/5 rating versus UOB Kay Hian's 3.3/5. It's our pick for Best Overall and Best for Beginners given its simpler fee model and broader asset access.
UOB Kay Hian isn't far behind, and for traders prioritizing ultra-tight spreads or multi-jurisdiction regulatory assurance, it remains a highly competitive alternative — earning our awards for Best for Low Fees and Best for Regulation.
Ultimately, the right choice depends on trading style: active scalpers and equity-focused investors may gravitate toward UOB Kay Hian, while multi-asset traders wanting simplicity and higher leverage should lean Phillip Nova.
The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.
Phillip Nova edges out UOB Kay Hian overall based on our expert rating score.
Highest Rated
Phillip Nova
3.4 / 5 / 5
Category winners
Overall winner
Based on overall expert rating (3.4/5).
Better for beginners
Stronger onboarding and educational resources.
Lower trading costs
More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.
Stronger regulation
Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.
Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Our #1 Pick Right Now: AvaTrade
Same category, top-tier regulation, and it's currently accepting new traders.