Brokers Profile
Reviewed by Experts Updated 10/23/2026

Phillip Nova vs UOB Kay Hian: Which Singapore Broker Wins in 2026?

Phillip Nova and UOB Kay Hian are two established Singapore-based brokers vying for the attention of local and regional traders. Phillip Nova edges ahead overall with a 3.4/5 rating, while UOB Kay Hian counters with tighter spreads and broader regulatory coverage. This comparison breaks down exactly where each platform shines.

OVERALL WINNER
PN

Phillip Nova

3.4 / 5Score: 2 / 3

Commission-free multi-asset trading with higher leverage for traders who want simplicity without sacrificing flexibility.

Min deposit
$0
Max leverage
1:20
Spread from
0.6 pips
Regulators
MAS
UK

UOB Kay Hian

3.3 / 5Score: 1 / 3

Tight institutional-grade spreads backed by dual tier-1 regulation for cost-conscious, compliance-focused traders.

Min deposit
$0
Max leverage
1:5
Spread from
0 pips
Regulators
MAS, SFC

Our #1 Pick Right Now: AvaTrade

Same category, top-tier regulation, and it's currently accepting new traders.

See What Makes It Different
Overall Winner
Phillip Nova
Best for Beginners
Phillip Nova
Lowest Fees
UOB Kay Hian
Top Regulation
UOB Kay Hian

Side-by-side comparison

Core features compared head-to-head.

Feature
PN
Phillip Nova
UK
UOB Kay Hian
Overview
Rating3.4 / 53.3 / 5
Founded20051973
HeadquartersSingaporeSingapore
RegulationMASMAS, SFC
Fees & Limits
Min Deposit$0$0
Spreads From0.6 pips0 pips
CommissionNone$0.18/lot
Max Leverage1:201:5
Platforms & Markets
Trading PlatformsProprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile, POEMSProprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile, UTRADE
Markets OfferedForex, Cfd, Indices, Commodities, CryptoStocks, Etf, Indices, Forex

Trading & non-trading fees

Min Deposit

Phillip Nova

$0

UOB Kay Hian

$0

Spreads From

Phillip Nova

0.6 pips

UOB Kay Hian

0 pips

Commission

Phillip Nova

None

UOB Kay Hian

$0.18/lot

Deposit Fees

Phillip Nova

None

UOB Kay Hian

None

Withdrawal Fees

Phillip Nova

None

UOB Kay Hian

None

Pros & cons

PN

Phillip Nova

Pros

  • Higher overall independent rating at 3.4/5
  • No per-trade commission simplifies cost calculations
  • Higher maximum leverage of up to 1:20
  • Broader market access across five asset classes
  • Zero minimum deposit lowers the barrier to entry
  • No deposit or withdrawal fees

Cons

  • Wider starting spread of 0.6 pips compared to competitor's 0 pips
  • Single regulatory licence (MAS only) versus multi-jurisdiction coverage
  • Younger company history, founded in 2005
  • Proprietary-only platform lineup without third-party charting options like MetaTrader
UK

UOB Kay Hian

Pros

  • Tighter spreads starting from 0 pips
  • Dual regulatory licences across MAS and SFC
  • Long operating history since 1973 builds institutional trust
  • Zero minimum deposit requirement
  • No deposit or withdrawal fees

Cons

  • Lower overall independent rating at 3.3/5
  • Charges a per-lot commission of $0.18 on top of spreads
  • Lower maximum leverage capped at 1:5
  • Narrower market range focused mainly on equities and indices
  • No dedicated crypto or commodities CFD access

Our expert verdict

Editor's verdict

Overall winner Phillip Nova
Lowest fees UOB Kay Hian
Best regulation UOB Kay Hian
Better for beginners Phillip Nova

Phillip Nova is the better all-round choice for most traders, scoring 3.4/5 against UOB Kay Hian's 3.3/5 on our independent rating. Phillip Nova wins on commission-free trading, higher leverage, and broader market access, making it our pick for Best Overall and Best for Beginners. However, UOB Kay Hian fights back with 0.0 pip spreads and dual MAS/SFC regulation, earning it our awards for Best for Low Fees and Best for Regulation. Cost-focused traders who value regulatory breadth over sheer convenience may still find UOB Kay Hian the smarter fit.

Overall Ratings & Reputation

On our independent rating system, Phillip Nova scores 3.4/5 compared to UOB Kay Hian's 3.3/5 — a narrow but consistent lead across our testing criteria. Both brokers are long-standing Singapore institutions, but they come from different corporate lineages: Phillip Nova via the Phillip Securities group, and UOB Kay Hian as the brokerage arm of a major Singaporean banking group.

The gap between the two is small enough that either broker is a defensible choice, but Phillip Nova's slightly broader feature set tips the scale. UOB Kay Hian's century-spanning heritage (founded 1973) versus Phillip Nova's 2005 founding does give it an edge in sheer institutional longevity, which may matter to more conservative investors.

Fees, Spreads & Commissions

This is where UOB Kay Hian pulls ahead decisively. It advertises spreads from 0.0 pips, undercutting Phillip Nova's starting spread of 0.6 pips. However, UOB Kay Hian offsets this with a per-lot commission of $0.18, whereas Phillip Nova charges no commission at all on its trades.

For high-frequency or high-volume traders, UOB Kay Hian's tighter raw spreads combined with its small commission can still work out cheaper overall. Casual or lower-volume traders, however, may prefer Phillip Nova's simpler, commission-free pricing structure since there's no need to calculate per-lot costs on every transaction.

Neither broker charges deposit or withdrawal fees, which is a welcome parity that keeps account funding and cash-out costs neutral in this comparison. Both also require a $0 minimum deposit, removing barriers to entry for new account holders.

Regulation & Safety

Both brokers operate under tier-1 oversight, giving traders confidence that client funds and trading conduct are held to strict standards. Phillip Nova is regulated solely by Singapore's Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), while UOB Kay Hian holds the same MAS licence plus an additional Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) licence from Hong Kong.

This dual-jurisdiction coverage gives UOB Kay Hian a regulatory breadth advantage, which is particularly relevant for traders who operate across both Singapore and Hong Kong markets or who simply prefer brokers with multiple regulatory bodies monitoring their operations.

Phillip Nova's single MAS licence is still a highly respected tier-1 regulatory framework, and for traders focused purely on the Singapore market, this alone provides ample protection and oversight.

Trading Platforms & Tools

Phillip Nova offers its Proprietary Web and Proprietary Mobile platforms alongside POEMS, its flagship in-house trading suite built for multi-asset access. UOB Kay Hian similarly provides Proprietary Web and Proprietary Mobile options, paired with its own UTRADE platform.

Both brokers rely on proprietary technology rather than third-party platforms like MetaTrader, which means traders should expect a more bank-style, structured interface rather than the highly customizable charting environments found elsewhere. POEMS and UTRADE both support order management and portfolio tracking suited to their respective product ranges.

Neither platform suite stands out as dramatically superior — the choice largely comes down to which proprietary ecosystem aligns better with a trader's existing brokerage relationships or asset focus.

Leverage & Market Access

Phillip Nova offers considerably higher maximum leverage at 1:20, compared to UOB Kay Hian's more conservative 1:5 cap. For traders who want more flexibility in position sizing, Phillip Nova's higher ceiling provides greater capital efficiency, albeit with correspondingly higher risk.

Market access also favors Phillip Nova slightly, with coverage across Forex, CFDs, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto — five distinct asset classes. UOB Kay Hian focuses more on traditional instruments: Stocks, ETFs, Indices, and Forex, which suits investors more interested in equities and fund-based products than derivatives or digital assets.

Traders whose strategies depend on crypto or commodity CFD exposure will find Phillip Nova the more capable platform, while long-term equity and ETF investors may lean toward UOB Kay Hian's stock-centric offering.

Our Verdict

Phillip Nova takes the overall win thanks to its commission-free structure, higher leverage ceiling, and wider range of tradable markets, backed by a 3.4/5 rating versus UOB Kay Hian's 3.3/5. It's our pick for Best Overall and Best for Beginners given its simpler fee model and broader asset access.

UOB Kay Hian isn't far behind, and for traders prioritizing ultra-tight spreads or multi-jurisdiction regulatory assurance, it remains a highly competitive alternative — earning our awards for Best for Low Fees and Best for Regulation.

Ultimately, the right choice depends on trading style: active scalpers and equity-focused investors may gravitate toward UOB Kay Hian, while multi-asset traders wanting simplicity and higher leverage should lean Phillip Nova.

Verdict summary

The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.

Editor's verdict

Phillip Nova wins overall

Phillip Nova edges out UOB Kay Hian overall based on our expert rating score.

PN

Highest Rated

Phillip Nova

3.4 / 5 / 5

Category winners

  • Overall winner

    Based on overall expert rating (3.4/5).

    Phillip Nova
  • Better for beginners

    Stronger onboarding and educational resources.

    Phillip Nova
  • Lower trading costs

    More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.

    UOB Kay Hian
  • Stronger regulation

    Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.

    UOB Kay Hian

Frequently asked questions

Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

Our #1 Pick Right Now: AvaTrade

Same category, top-tier regulation, and it's currently accepting new traders.

See What Makes It Different
BP AI