Robinhood
Zero-commission trading backed by tier-1 US regulatory oversight, built for the mobile-first generation.
- Min deposit
- $0
- Max leverage
- 1:1
- Spread from
- 0 pips
- Regulators
- SEC, CFTC
Robinhood and Rakuten Securities both offer zero-commission trading, but they cater to very different investors. Robinhood edges ahead with tier-1 US regulation and a higher overall rating, while Rakuten Securities counters with broader market access and higher leverage.
Zero-commission trading backed by tier-1 US regulatory oversight, built for the mobile-first generation.
A veteran Japanese broker offering wide market access and advanced charting through MarketSpeed II.
Core features compared head-to-head.
| Feature | R Robinhood | RS Rakuten Securities |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.6 / 5 | 3.4 / 5 |
| Founded | 2013 | 1999 |
| Headquarters | Menlo Park, USA | Tokyo, Japan |
| Regulation | SEC, CFTC | FSA |
| Fees & Limits | ||
| Min Deposit | $0 | $0 |
| Spreads From | 0 pips | 0 pips |
| Commission | None | None |
| Max Leverage | 1:1 | 1:3 |
| Platforms & Markets | ||
| Trading Platforms | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile, MarketSpeed II |
| Markets Offered | Stocks, Crypto, Cfd | Stocks, Etf, Crypto, Forex, Indices |
Robinhood
$0
Rakuten Securities
$0
Robinhood
0 pips
Rakuten Securities
0 pips
Robinhood
None
Rakuten Securities
None
Robinhood
None
Rakuten Securities
None
Robinhood
None
Rakuten Securities
None
Robinhood is our top pick overall, earning a 3.6/5 on our proprietary rating scale compared to Rakuten Securities's 3.4/5. The deciding factors are Robinhood's tier-1 regulatory coverage under the SEC and CFTC, and its slightly stronger all-around package for cost-conscious, beginner-friendly traders. Rakuten Securities remains a compelling alternative for those who need broader market access, higher leverage, or the MarketSpeed II platform, particularly investors based in Japan.
Regulatory strength is one of the clearest differentiators in this matchup. Robinhood is overseen by two tier-1 US regulators, the SEC and the CFTC, both of which enforce strict capital, custody, and disclosure requirements on registered brokers.
Rakuten Securities operates under the oversight of Japan's Financial Services Agency (FSA), a respected regulator in its own right, but this gives Robinhood the edge on our scoring for regulatory breadth with a 2/2 score versus Rakuten Securities's 0/2.
For traders who prioritize regulatory diversification and prefer brokers answerable to multiple oversight bodies, Robinhood's structure offers a stronger layer of protection. That said, single-jurisdiction FSA regulation is still considered dependable, especially for Japan-based investors.
Both brokers advertise spreads starting from 0 pips and charge no commission on standard trades, making this category closely contested on paper. Neither platform charges deposit or withdrawal fees, which keeps the overall cost of moving money in and out of either account effectively at zero.
The real difference emerges once you factor in the broader trading conditions. Robinhood's simplified, no-frills fee structure is easier for beginners to understand at a glance, while Rakuten Securities's fee schedule is layered across a wider range of instruments including forex and indices.
Neither broker imposes a minimum deposit requirement, with both listing $0 as the entry threshold. This makes both platforms equally accessible for traders who want to start small and scale up over time.
Rakuten Securities pulls ahead decisively in market breadth, offering Stocks, ETFs, Crypto, Forex, and Indices — five distinct asset classes in total. Robinhood, by comparison, offers a narrower selection of Stocks, Crypto, and CFDs.
This distinction matters significantly for diversified traders. Anyone looking to trade forex pairs or indices alongside equities will find Rakuten Securities the more capable platform, while Robinhood remains more focused on core US equities and crypto exposure.
Leverage availability also favors Rakuten Securities, which offers up to 1:3 versus Robinhood's 1:1 cap. Traders seeking amplified exposure on their capital will find more flexibility with Rakuten Securities, though higher leverage always carries increased risk.
Robinhood supports a Proprietary Web platform and a Proprietary Mobile app, both designed with simplicity and ease of use as the guiding principles. This makes Robinhood particularly attractive to newer traders who want a clean, distraction-free interface.
Rakuten Securities supports three platforms: Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile, and the more advanced MarketSpeed II terminal. MarketSpeed II is geared toward active traders who need deeper charting, order-flow tools, and more granular market data.
For traders who value platform choice and the option to graduate to a more powerful terminal as their strategy matures, Rakuten Securities offers more room to grow. Robinhood's more streamlined approach benefits those who prefer speed and simplicity over feature depth.
Rakuten Securities has a substantially longer operating history, founded in 1999 and headquartered in Tokyo, Japan. This gives it well over two decades of track record navigating multiple market cycles.
Robinhood is a newer entrant, founded in 2013 and based in Menlo Park, USA, but has built a large and loyal user base quickly by focusing on commission-free trading and mobile-first design.
Longevity is not the only factor that matters, but traders who place a premium on institutional history may lean toward Rakuten Securities, while those drawn to modern fintech innovation may prefer Robinhood's newer, more agile approach.
Taking all criteria together, Robinhood earns our recommendation as the stronger overall broker with a 3.6/5 rating, driven primarily by its tier-1 regulatory standing under the SEC and CFTC. Rakuten Securities trails slightly at 3.4/5 but compensates with broader market access, higher leverage, and a more established operating history.
The right choice ultimately depends on individual priorities. Beginners and US-focused traders who want simplicity and strong regulatory backing should lean toward Robinhood, while diversified traders seeking forex, indices, and advanced charting tools may find Rakuten Securities the better fit.
The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.
Robinhood edges out Rakuten Securities overall based on our expert rating score.
Highest Rated
Robinhood
3.6 / 5 / 5
Category winners
Overall winner
Based on overall expert rating (3.6/5).
Better for beginners
Stronger onboarding and educational resources.
Lower trading costs
More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.
Stronger regulation
Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.
Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.