Saxo Bank
Institutional-grade regulation and three decades of banking heritage for serious multi-asset investors.
- Min deposit
- $2000
- Max leverage
- 1:200
- Spread from
- 0.4 pips
- Regulators
- FCA, MAS, ASIC
Saxo Bank and Aetos Capital target very different traders — one built for regulatory depth and premium tools, the other for accessibility and tight spreads. Our proprietary research gives Saxo Bank the overall edge at 4.0/5 against Aetos Capital's 3.4/5. Here's exactly why, and where Aetos Capital still fights back.
Institutional-grade regulation and three decades of banking heritage for serious multi-asset investors.
Low-cost, high-leverage access to forex and crypto CFDs starting with just $50.
Core features compared head-to-head.
| Feature | SB Saxo Bank | AC Aetos Capital |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 3.4 / 5 |
| Founded | 1992 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Copenhagen, Denmark | Sydney, Australia |
| Regulation | FCA, MAS, ASIC | ASIC, FCA |
| Fees & Limits | ||
| Min Deposit | $2000 | $50 |
| Spreads From | 0.4 pips | 0 pips |
| Commission | $0.08/lot | $3.5/lot |
| Max Leverage | 1:200 | 1:500 |
| Platforms & Markets | ||
| Trading Platforms | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile | MT4, MT5 |
| Markets Offered | Stocks, Forex, Cfd, Indices, Commodities | Forex, Cfd, Indices, Commodities, Crypto |
Saxo Bank
$2000
Aetos Capital
$50
Saxo Bank
0.4 pips
Aetos Capital
0 pips
Saxo Bank
$0.08/lot
Aetos Capital
$3.5/lot
Saxo Bank
None
Aetos Capital
None
Saxo Bank
None
Aetos Capital
None
Saxo Bank is our top pick overall in this matchup, earning a 4.0/5 rating compared to Aetos Capital's 3.4/5, thanks to superior tier-1 regulation (FCA, MAS, ASIC) and a longer 30+ year track record. That said, Aetos Capital fights back hard on cost and accessibility, offering spreads from 0 pips and a minimum deposit of just $50 versus Saxo Bank's $2000 entry point. Traders prioritizing safety and institutional-grade infrastructure should choose Saxo Bank, while budget-conscious or high-leverage traders may lean toward Aetos Capital.
Saxo Bank holds licences across three tier-1 jurisdictions — the FCA, MAS, and ASIC — giving it one of the more comprehensive regulatory footprints in this comparison. This multi-jurisdictional oversight matters most for traders who value fund segregation, capital adequacy requirements, and dispute resolution frameworks typical of established banking regulators.
Aetos Capital is not unregulated by any means, holding licences from both ASIC and FCA, which still places it among credibly supervised brokers. However, with two licences versus Saxo Bank's three, and a shorter operating history since 2013 versus 1992, Saxo Bank presents the deeper institutional safety net.
For traders whose top priority is capital protection above all else, particularly those holding larger account balances, Saxo Bank's regulatory breadth is the stronger foundation.
This is where Aetos Capital claws back significant ground. Its spreads start from 0 pips, undercutting Saxo Bank's 0.4 pip minimum, making it the more attractive option for scalpers and high-frequency traders sensitive to spread costs.
On commissions, however, the picture flips. Saxo Bank charges a notably lower $0.08 per lot compared to Aetos Capital's $3.5 per lot, meaning the total cost of trading can vary significantly depending on strategy and volume.
Neither broker charges deposit or withdrawal fees, which is a welcome consistency for cost-conscious traders on both sides. Active high-volume traders should model both spread and commission structures against their typical trade size before deciding, since Saxo Bank's low commission can offset its wider spread on larger trades.
Accessibility is a clear win for Aetos Capital. Its $50 minimum deposit is dramatically lower than Saxo Bank's $2000 requirement, opening the door to traders with limited starting capital or those wanting to test a platform before committing serious funds.
Saxo Bank's higher deposit threshold reflects its positioning as a more premium, institutionally-minded broker, which naturally filters toward traders with larger account sizes.
Beginners or students exploring live trading for the first time will likely find Aetos Capital's entry point far friendlier, while more capitalized traders won't be deterred by Saxo Bank's requirement.
Saxo Bank relies on its own Proprietary Web and Proprietary Mobile platforms, giving it full control over feature rollouts, charting tools, and interface design tailored to its multi-asset offering.
Aetos Capital instead runs on the industry-standard MT4 and MT5 platforms, which benefit from massive third-party indicator libraries, expert advisor compatibility, and a trading community most retail forex traders already know intimately.
The right pick here depends on preference: traders who value a polished, all-in-one proprietary ecosystem should lean toward Saxo Bank, while those who want algorithmic trading flexibility and familiar MetaTrader tools will prefer Aetos Capital.
Aetos Capital offers considerably higher maximum leverage at 1:500, compared to Saxo Bank's more conservative 1:200 cap. Higher leverage can amplify both gains and losses, so this suits experienced traders comfortable managing that added risk.
In terms of market breadth, Saxo Bank covers Stocks, Forex, CFDs, Indices, and Commodities, appealing to multi-asset investors. Aetos Capital covers Forex, CFDs, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto, notably including cryptocurrency exposure that Saxo Bank's lineup here does not list.
Traders wanting direct stock exposure alongside forex will find Saxo Bank's markets more diversified for traditional investing, while crypto-curious traders may find Aetos Capital's inclusion of digital assets a meaningful differentiator.
Saxo Bank is the stronger all-around broker in this comparison, earning our recommendation with a 4.0/5 rating driven by superior regulation, a three-decade track record, and lower per-lot commissions. It's the safer, more institution-grade choice for traders prioritizing regulatory depth and multi-asset investing.
Aetos Capital remains a genuinely solid alternative for cost-sensitive beginners, offering a dramatically lower minimum deposit, tighter raw spreads, and higher leverage for those who want it.
Ultimately, well-capitalized traders and long-term investors should lean Saxo Bank, while newer traders testing strategies on a smaller budget may find Aetos Capital's accessibility hard to beat.
The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.
Saxo Bank edges out Aetos Capital overall based on our expert rating score.
Highest Rated
Saxo Bank
4.0 / 5 / 5
Category winners
Overall winner
Based on overall expert rating (4/5).
Better for beginners
Stronger onboarding and educational resources.
Lower trading costs
More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.
Stronger regulation
Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.
Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.