Stake
Zero-deposit, zero-commission stock investing backed by tier-1 ASIC and FCA regulation.
- Min deposit
- $0
- Max leverage
- 1:1
- Spread from
- 0 pips
- Regulators
- ASIC, FCA
Stake and Equiti both attract active traders, but they serve very different purposes. Our 2026 research shows Stake edging ahead overall with a 3.4/5 rating versus Equiti's 3.2/5, thanks to tighter regulation and lower costs.
Zero-deposit, zero-commission stock investing backed by tier-1 ASIC and FCA regulation.
A multi-asset MT4/MT5 broker offering high leverage and broad market access for experienced traders.
Core features compared head-to-head.
| Feature | S Stake | E Equiti |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.4 / 5 | 3.2 / 5 |
| Founded | 2017 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Sydney, Australia | Amman, Jordan |
| Regulation | ASIC, FCA | FCA, FSRA |
| Fees & Limits | ||
| Min Deposit | $0 | $500 |
| Spreads From | 0 pips | 0.5 pips |
| Commission | None | None |
| Max Leverage | 1:1 | 1:500 |
| Platforms & Markets | ||
| Trading Platforms | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile | MT4, MT5 |
| Markets Offered | Stocks | Forex, Cfd, Stocks, Indices, Commodities, Crypto |
Stake
$0
Equiti
$500
Stake
0 pips
Equiti
0.5 pips
Stake
None
Equiti
None
Stake
None
Equiti
None
Stake
None
Equiti
None
Stake is our top pick in this matchup, earning a 3.4/5 rating compared to Equiti's 3.2/5 on our independent scoring system. Stake's combination of tier-1 regulation from ASIC and FCA, zero-pip spreads, and a $0 minimum deposit make it the stronger all-around platform for most traders in 2026. Equiti remains a credible alternative for traders who specifically want multi-asset access and higher leverage through MT4/MT5, but it trails Stake on cost, accessibility, and our overall scoring.
Regulatory strength is often the single most important factor for traders choosing between two brokers, and here Stake holds a clear edge. Stake is regulated by both the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and the UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), two of the most respected tier-1 regulators in the world.
Equiti is also regulated, holding licences from the FCA and the Financial Services Regulatory Authority (FSRA) in Abu Dhabi. While this is a legitimate regulatory footprint, it is considered slightly less robust overall than Stake's dual tier-1 coverage from ASIC and FCA combined.
For traders who prioritize capital protection and regulatory oversight above all else, Stake's broader tier-1 licensing gives it the advantage in this category.
Cost efficiency is where Stake truly separates itself from Equiti. Stake advertises spreads starting from 0 pips with no commission charges, making it an extremely competitive option for cost-conscious traders.
Equiti, by comparison, starts its spreads from 0.5 pips, also with no additional commission. While 0.5 pips is still reasonable in the broader industry context, it puts Equiti at a pricing disadvantage directly against Stake.
Neither broker charges deposit or withdrawal fees, which is a welcome point of parity. However, when it comes to raw spread costs, Stake is the more economical choice for frequent traders.
Accessibility for newer or smaller-balance traders is another area where Stake pulls ahead significantly. Stake requires no minimum deposit at all ($0), removing a major barrier to entry for beginners testing the waters.
Equiti requires a $500 minimum deposit, a considerably higher bar that may discourage newer traders or those wanting to start small. This difference alone makes Stake the more approachable platform for first-time investors.
For traders who want to start trading immediately without committing significant capital upfront, Stake's zero-deposit requirement is a decisive advantage.
Stake operates on proprietary web and mobile platforms, built in-house and tailored primarily around stock trading. This gives Stake users a clean, modern interface, though it is more limited in scope compared to industry-standard terminals.
Equiti, on the other hand, supports the globally recognized MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 platforms, giving users access to advanced charting tools, automated trading (EAs), and a highly customizable trading environment.
On market breadth, Equiti is the clear winner, offering Forex, CFDs, Stocks, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto — six asset classes in total. Stake focuses solely on stocks, making Equiti the better fit for traders who want diversified, multi-asset exposure.
Leverage is one category where Equiti clearly outperforms Stake. Equiti offers leverage up to 1:500, appealing to experienced traders who want to amplify their market exposure with smaller capital outlays.
Stake, in contrast, offers just 1:1 leverage, reflecting its core positioning as a straightforward stock investment platform rather than a leveraged CFD or forex broker.
Traders seeking leveraged forex or CFD exposure will find Equiti's trading conditions far more suitable, while conservative, long-term stock investors will likely prefer Stake's simpler, unleveraged structure.
When weighing all factors together, Stake earns the higher overall rating at 3.4/5 versus Equiti's 3.2/5 on our independent scoring system. Stake wins on regulation strength, fee competitiveness, and beginner accessibility — three factors that matter enormously to most retail traders.
Equiti still holds genuine appeal for traders who need multi-asset access, higher leverage, and the familiarity of MT4/MT5 platforms. It is a credible, well-established broker founded in 2014 with a solid international regulatory footprint.
Ultimately, Stake is our recommended choice for the majority of traders in 2026, particularly beginners and cost-sensitive stock investors, while Equiti remains a strong niche pick for leveraged multi-asset trading.
The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.
Stake edges out Equiti overall based on our expert rating score.
Highest Rated
Stake
3.4 / 5 / 5
Category winners
Overall winner
Based on overall expert rating (3.4/5).
Better for beginners
Stronger onboarding and educational resources.
Lower trading costs
More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.
Stronger regulation
Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.
Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.