T
ThinkMarkets
3.9 / 5Score: 2 / 3
ThinkMarkets combines tier-1 regulation with true zero-pip spreads, giving traders a rare blend of safety and low-cost execution.
- Min deposit
- $0
- Max leverage
- 1:500
- Spread from
- 0 pips
- Regulators
- FCA, ASIC
Reviewed by Experts Updated 9/2/2026
ThinkMarkets vs Fusion Markets: Which Broker Wins in 2026?
ThinkMarkets and Fusion Markets both offer zero-pip spreads and zero-dollar minimum deposits, but they diverge sharply on regulation, commission pricing, and platform choice. This comparison breaks down exactly which broker suits your trading priorities.
FM
Fusion Markets
3.6 / 5Score: 1 / 3
Fusion Markets targets cost-conscious traders with lean commissions and TradingView charting, though its regulatory footprint is narrower.
- Min deposit
- $0
- Max leverage
- 1:500
- Spread from
- 0 pips
- Regulators
- ASIC
Overall Winner
ThinkMarkets
Best for Beginners
ThinkMarkets
Lowest Fees
ThinkMarkets
Top Regulation
ThinkMarkets
Side-by-side comparison
Core features compared head-to-head.
| Feature | T ThinkMarkets | FM Fusion Markets |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.9 / 5 | 3.6 / 5 |
| Founded | 2010 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | London, UK | Melbourne, Australia |
| Regulation | FCA, ASIC | ASIC |
| Fees & Limits | ||
| Min Deposit | $0 | $0 |
| Spreads From | 0 pips | 0 pips |
| Commission | $3.5/lot | $2.25/lot |
| Max Leverage | 1:500 | 1:500 |
| Platforms & Markets | ||
| Trading Platforms | MT4, MT5, Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile | MT4, MT5, TradingView |
| Markets Offered | Forex, Cfd, Stocks, Indices, Commodities, Crypto | Forex, Cfd, Stocks, Indices, Commodities, Crypto |
Trading & non-trading fees
Min Deposit
ThinkMarkets
$0
Fusion Markets
$0
Spreads From
ThinkMarkets
0 pips
Fusion Markets
0 pips
Commission
ThinkMarkets
$3.5/lot
Fusion Markets
$2.25/lot
Deposit Fees
ThinkMarkets
None
Fusion Markets
None
Withdrawal Fees
ThinkMarkets
None
Fusion Markets
None
Pros & cons
T
ThinkMarkets
Pros
- Backed by two respected tier-1 regulators (FCA and ASIC) rather than a single licence
- Slightly higher overall rating (3.9/5) reflecting a more well-rounded package
- Longer operating history since 2010, indicating sustained industry presence
- Wider platform choice with proprietary web and mobile apps in addition to MT4/MT5
- Zero dollar minimum deposit removes barriers for new traders
- No deposit or withdrawal fees keep account funding costs predictable
- Broad market access spanning forex, CFDs, stocks, indices, commodities and crypto
Cons
- Commission of $3.5/lot is higher than Fusion Markets's $2.25/lot on comparable accounts
- No TradingView integration, which some chart-focused traders may miss
- Higher headline commission could offset the appeal of zero-pip spreads for high-volume scalpers
- Proprietary platform learning curve for traders who are only familiar with MT4/MT5
FM
Fusion Markets
Pros
- Lower per-lot commission at $2.25 compared to ThinkMarkets's $3.5
- TradingView support appeals to traders who value advanced charting and social trading tools
- Zero minimum deposit matches ThinkMarkets, keeping entry costs low
- No deposit or withdrawal fees on standard funding methods
- Streamlined platform lineup that avoids overwhelming newer traders
- Straightforward account structure with clear cost transparency
Cons
- Single regulatory licence (ASIC only) versus ThinkMarkets's dual FCA/ASIC coverage
- Lower overall rating (3.6/5) versus ThinkMarkets's 3.9/5
- Shorter operating history, founded in 2017 versus ThinkMarkets's 2010 founding
- No proprietary web or mobile platform, relying solely on third-party software
- Narrower regulatory diversification may concern traders seeking multi-jurisdiction protection
Our expert verdict
Editor's verdict
Overall winner ThinkMarkets
Lowest fees ThinkMarkets
Best regulation ThinkMarkets
Better for beginners ThinkMarkets
ThinkMarkets is the stronger all-around broker, earning a 3.9/5 rating against Fusion Markets's 3.6/5, thanks to dual FCA/ASIC regulation, a longer track record, and a wider platform lineup. Fusion Markets still appeals to cost-focused traders through its lower $2.25/lot commission and native TradingView support. For most traders prioritizing safety and platform variety, ThinkMarkets is the recommended choice.
Regulation & Safety
ThinkMarkets operates under dual tier-1 regulation from the FCA and ASIC, giving traders oversight from two of the world's most respected financial authorities.
Fusion Markets, by contrast, is regulated solely by ASIC. While ASIC is a credible and well-regarded regulator, single-jurisdiction coverage offers less redundancy than ThinkMarkets's two-regulator structure.
For traders who weigh fund safety and regulatory recourse heavily, ThinkMarkets's broader licensing footprint gives it a clear edge in this category.
Fees, Spreads & Commissions
Both brokers advertise spreads starting from 0 pips, so neither has a meaningful edge on raw spread pricing at the headline level.
The real differentiator is commission: ThinkMarkets charges $3.5 per lot, while Fusion Markets charges a lower $2.25 per lot.
High-volume or scalping-focused traders may find Fusion Markets's lower commission structure more cost-effective over thousands of trades, even though ThinkMarkets wins on overall rating.
Neither broker charges deposit or withdrawal fees, so funding costs remain neutral regardless of which platform you choose.
Trading Platforms & Tools
ThinkMarkets supports MT4, MT5, plus its own proprietary web and mobile trading apps, giving traders four distinct ways to access the markets.
Fusion Markets supports MT4, MT5, and TradingView, a combination that appeals strongly to traders who already use TradingView's charting and social trading ecosystem.
Traders who value a polished proprietary experience may lean toward ThinkMarkets, while chart-driven traders may prefer Fusion Markets's TradingView integration.
Account Accessibility & Leverage
Both brokers offer a $0 minimum deposit, meaning cost of entry is identical for traders starting with limited capital.
Maximum leverage is also matched at 1:500 for eligible accounts on both platforms, subject to jurisdictional restrictions.
This parity means the leverage and entry-cost decision will not tip the scales either way — the real differences lie in regulation, commission, and platform choice.
Company Background & Track Record
ThinkMarkets was founded in 2010 and is headquartered in London, giving it 16 years of continuous operation and a longer-established industry presence.
Fusion Markets launched in 2017 from Melbourne, Australia, making it a newer entrant with roughly seven fewer years of operating history.
A longer track record isn't everything, but it does typically correlate with more tested infrastructure, deeper liquidity relationships, and greater institutional trust.
Our Verdict
ThinkMarkets earns the higher overall rating at 3.9/5 versus Fusion Markets's 3.6/5, driven primarily by its dual-regulator status, longer track record, and wider platform selection.
Fusion Markets remains a legitimate alternative for traders prioritizing lower commissions or TradingView access, and it should not be dismissed outright.
For the majority of traders — especially those newer to trading or prioritizing regulatory security — ThinkMarkets is the stronger overall package in this matchup.
Verdict summary
The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.
Editor's verdict
ThinkMarkets wins overall
ThinkMarkets edges out Fusion Markets overall based on our expert rating score.
T
Highest Rated
ThinkMarkets
3.9 / 5 / 5
Category winners
Overall winner
Based on overall expert rating (3.9/5).
ThinkMarketsBetter for beginners
Stronger onboarding and educational resources.
ThinkMarketsLower trading costs
More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.
ThinkMarketsStronger regulation
Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.
ThinkMarkets
Frequently asked questions
Based on our independent rating system, ThinkMarkets edges out Fusion Markets with a 3.9/5 score compared to 3.6/5. The gap largely stems from ThinkMarkets's dual tier-1 regulation, longer operating history, and broader platform selection. That said, Fusion Markets remains competitive on commission pricing, so your ideal choice depends on whether regulatory depth or lower per-lot costs matter more to your strategy.
Both brokers advertise spreads from 0 pips, so the real cost differentiator is commission. Fusion Markets charges $2.25 per lot, undercutting ThinkMarkets's $3.5 per lot. High-frequency traders running large volumes may find Fusion Markets's commission structure more economical over time, even though ThinkMarkets offers a stronger regulatory package.
Both ThinkMarkets and Fusion Markets allow account opening with a $0 minimum deposit, making either broker equally accessible to traders with limited starting capital. This removes a common barrier for beginners testing strategies with smaller account sizes before scaling up.
ThinkMarkets holds regulatory licences from both the FCA and ASIC, two respected tier-1 regulators, giving it a broader safety net. Fusion Markets is regulated solely by ASIC. While ASIC alone is a credible regulator, ThinkMarkets's dual-jurisdiction oversight generally provides traders with additional recourse and compliance assurance.
ThinkMarkets offers MT4, MT5, and its own proprietary web and mobile apps, giving traders more flexibility in how they access the markets. Fusion Markets supports MT4, MT5, and TradingView, appealing to traders who prefer TradingView's charting ecosystem over a proprietary interface.
Yes, nothing prevents you from opening accounts with both brokers simultaneously. Many traders diversify across multiple platforms to access different execution models, charting tools, or regulatory environments, and running both accounts side-by-side can help you compare real-world execution quality firsthand.
Both brokers offer maximum leverage of up to 1:500 for eligible clients, so there is no meaningful difference in leverage ceilings between the two. Actual available leverage will depend on your jurisdiction, account type, and applicable regulatory caps.
Neither broker charges deposit or withdrawal fees on standard payment methods, according to our research. This makes funding and withdrawing from either account cost-neutral, though third-party payment providers or currency conversion charges could still apply depending on your funding method.
ThinkMarkets was founded in 2010 and is headquartered in London, giving it roughly seven more years of operating history than Fusion Markets, which launched in 2017 out of Melbourne, Australia. A longer track record can indicate greater operational stability, though newer brokers like Fusion Markets can still offer competitive, modern trading conditions.
ThinkMarkets is generally considered the stronger pick for beginners, thanks to its intuitive proprietary web and mobile platforms that simplify order entry and account management. Fusion Markets is still beginner-friendly, particularly for those who want to learn using TradingView's popular charting interface from day one.
Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.