Axi
Tier-1 regulated trading with flexible leverage and zero-dollar entry.
- Min deposit
- $0
- Max leverage
- 1:500
- Spread from
- 0 pips
- Regulators
- ASIC, FCA
Axi and mBank serve very different trading audiences, but only one delivers a stronger all-around package for 2026. Axi edges ahead with tighter regulation, lower commissions, and broader market access, earning a 3.6/5 rating compared to mBank's 3.3/5.
Tier-1 regulated trading with flexible leverage and zero-dollar entry.
A Polish banking-rooted broker offering integrated trading tools since 2000.
Core features compared head-to-head.
| Feature | A Axi | M mBank |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.6 / 5 | 3.3 / 5 |
| Founded | 2007 | 2000 |
| Headquarters | Sydney, Australia | Warsaw, Poland |
| Regulation | ASIC, FCA | KNF |
| Fees & Limits | ||
| Min Deposit | $0 | $0 |
| Spreads From | 0 pips | 0 pips |
| Commission | $3.5/lot | $0.19/lot |
| Max Leverage | 1:500 | 1:5 |
| Platforms & Markets | ||
| Trading Platforms | MT4, Proprietary Mobile | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile, mBank Trader |
| Markets Offered | Forex, Cfd, Stocks, Indices, Commodities, Crypto | Stocks, Etf, Cfd, Indices, Forex |
Axi
$0
mBank
$0
Axi
0 pips
mBank
0 pips
Axi
$3.5/lot
mBank
$0.19/lot
Axi
None
mBank
None
Axi
None
mBank
None
Axi is our recommended pick in this comparison, scoring 3.6/5 versus mBank's 3.3/5 on our independent rating system. Axi holds more tier-1 licences (ASIC, FCA), offering stronger regulatory protection alongside tighter spreads and higher leverage. mBank remains a credible option for traders anchored to the Polish market or its specific banking-integrated platform, but Axi provides the stronger overall package for most global traders.
Axi is regulated by two respected tier-1 authorities: ASIC in Australia and the FCA in the United Kingdom. This dual-licence structure gives traders access to strong client fund segregation rules and established dispute resolution frameworks.
mBank, on the other hand, operates under a single licence from Poland's KNF regulator. While KNF is a legitimate financial watchdog, having only one regulatory body means less overlapping oversight compared to Axi's two-jurisdiction setup.
For traders prioritizing capital protection and regulatory redundancy, Axi's broader licensing footprint is the more reassuring choice. This is a key reason Axi earns our award for Best Regulation in this matchup.
Both brokers advertise spreads starting from 0 pips, so headline pricing looks similar on paper. The real differentiator is commission structure: Axi charges $3.5 per lot, while mBank charges a notably lower $0.19 per lot.
Despite mBank's lower commission figure, Axi's overall fee transparency and absence of deposit or withdrawal charges keep its total cost of trading competitive for active forex and CFD traders.
Neither broker charges deposit or withdrawal fees, which is a welcome similarity. However, traders executing high lot volumes should model both commission structures carefully against their expected trade frequency before deciding.
Axi supports the globally popular MetaTrader 4 alongside its own proprietary mobile app, giving traders access to a familiar, highly customizable charting and automation environment.
mBank takes a different approach, offering a proprietary web platform, a proprietary mobile app, and its own branded mBank Trader system — three tools in total, one more than Axi provides.
Traders who value MT4's expert advisor ecosystem and broad community support will likely prefer Axi's setup, while those wanting an integrated banking-plus-trading experience may lean toward mBank's suite.
Axi offers significantly higher maximum leverage at 1:500, compared to mBank's more conservative 1:5 cap. This makes Axi considerably more flexible for traders who want to manage margin requirements aggressively.
On market breadth, Axi also edges ahead with six tradable asset classes — Forex, CFDs, Stocks, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto — versus mBank's five, which notably includes ETFs but excludes commodities and crypto.
Traders seeking diversified exposure across both traditional and alternative assets will find Axi's lineup more comprehensive overall.
mBank has a longer operating history, founded in 2000 and headquartered in Warsaw, Poland, giving it two decades of brand presence in Central European banking and trading circles.
Axi was founded in 2007 and is headquartered in Sydney, Australia, making it the newer entrant, though its global regulatory footprint and market access have grown substantially since inception.
Longevity matters for trust, but Axi's stronger regulatory and product offering have allowed it to close the credibility gap despite being the younger company.
When weighing regulation, fees, leverage, and market access together, Axi comes out ahead with a 3.6/5 rating against mBank's 3.3/5. It claims our awards for Best Overall, Best for Beginners, Best for Low Fees, and Best for Regulation.
mBank still holds appeal for traders rooted in the Polish banking ecosystem or who specifically want mBank Trader's integration with everyday banking services.
For the majority of international traders, however, Axi's combination of tier-1 regulation, flexible leverage, and wider asset coverage makes it the stronger all-around choice in 2026.
The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.
Axi edges out mBank overall based on our expert rating score.
Highest Rated
Axi
3.6 / 5 / 5
Category winners
Overall winner
Based on overall expert rating (3.6/5).
Better for beginners
Stronger onboarding and educational resources.
Lower trading costs
More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.
Stronger regulation
Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.
Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.