Capital.com and Amana Capital both offer multi-asset CFD trading, but they differ sharply on regulation, cost of entry, and platform choice. Our research gives Capital.com the clear edge with a 4.0/5 overall rating against Amana Capital's 3.2/5.
Capital.com combines tier-1 regulatory strength with a near-zero entry barrier, making professional-grade CFD trading accessible from just $20.
Amana Capital brings over a decade of market experience with a dedicated MT4/MT5 trading environment built for MetaTrader purists.
Core features compared head-to-head.
| Feature | C Capital.com | AC Amana Capital |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 3.2 / 5 |
| Founded | 2016 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | London, UK | Beirut, Lebanon |
| Regulation | FCA, CySEC, ASIC | FCA, DFSA |
| Fees & Limits | ||
| Min Deposit | $20 | $100 |
| Spreads From | 0.6 pips | 0.6 pips |
| Commission | None | None |
| Max Leverage | 1:200 | 1:200 |
| Platforms & Markets | ||
| Trading Platforms | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile, MT4 | MT4, MT5 |
| Markets Offered | Cfd, Forex, Stocks, Indices, Commodities, Crypto | Forex, Cfd, Stocks, Indices, Commodities, Crypto |
Capital.com
$20
Amana Capital
$100
Capital.com
0.6 pips
Amana Capital
0.6 pips
Capital.com
None
Amana Capital
None
Capital.com
None
Amana Capital
None
Capital.com
None
Amana Capital
None
Capital.com is our recommended pick overall, scoring 3.96/5 versus Amana Capital's 3.21/5 on our independent rating system. It holds more tier-1 regulatory licences (FCA, ASIC), demands a far lower $20 minimum deposit, and gives traders a broader platform choice including its own proprietary web and mobile apps alongside MT4. Amana Capital remains a credible alternative for traders who specifically want MT4/MT5-only execution or value its longer track record since 2010, but for most traders — especially beginners and cost-conscious active traders — Capital.com is the stronger all-round package.
Regulation is often the single most important factor when choosing a broker, and this is where Capital.com pulls ahead decisively. Capital.com is licensed by the FCA, CySEC, and ASIC — three well-respected tier-1 and tier-2 regulators spanning the UK, Europe, and Australia.
Amana Capital, by comparison, holds just two licences: the FCA and the DFSA (Dubai Financial Services Authority). While both are legitimate regulators, Amana Capital's narrower regulatory footprint and Beirut headquarters may raise questions for traders who prioritize multi-jurisdictional oversight.
For risk-conscious traders, more overlapping regulatory coverage generally means stronger segregated client fund protections and more avenues for dispute resolution. Capital.com's three-licence structure gives it a meaningful edge here.
Both brokers advertise spreads starting from 0.6 pips and charge no trading commission, so the headline cost of trading is essentially tied on paper. Neither broker charges deposit or withdrawal fees, which is a welcome feature for traders who move funds frequently.
The real differentiator is accessibility: Capital.com's minimum deposit sits at just $20, compared to Amana Capital's $100 requirement. For beginners or traders testing a strategy with smaller capital, that $80 difference can matter considerably.
Leverage is identical across both brokers at a maximum of 1:200, so neither platform offers an advantage on margin terms. Overall, Capital.com's lower entry barrier gives it a practical cost edge even though quoted spreads are matched.
Capital.com offers its own Proprietary Web and Proprietary Mobile platforms alongside MT4 support, giving traders three distinct ways to access the markets. Its in-house platforms are built around AI-powered insights and a clean, modern interface designed for both new and experienced traders.
Amana Capital takes a more traditional approach, supporting only MT4 and MT5. This will appeal strongly to purists who want the familiarity, automation (Expert Advisors), and extensive third-party indicator ecosystem that MetaTrader is known for.
Traders who value platform flexibility and modern UX will likely prefer Capital.com's broader selection, while dedicated MetaTrader users may find Amana Capital's MT4/MT5-only setup perfectly sufficient.
Both brokers offer an almost identical breadth of markets: CFDs, forex, stocks, indices, commodities, and crypto are all available on each platform. This parity means market selection is unlikely to be a deciding factor between the two.
Capital.com lists its offering with CFDs first, suggesting a CFD-centric brand identity, while Amana Capital leads with forex — reflecting its roots as a traditional currency-focused brokerage since 2010.
In practice, traders at either broker gain access to the same core asset classes, so the choice will come down more to regulation, platform, and account minimums than product diversity.
Amana Capital holds a notable longevity advantage, having been founded in 2010 compared to Capital.com's 2016 launch. Six extra years of operating history can offer some reassurance to traders who weight longevity heavily in their due diligence.
That said, Capital.com has grown rapidly since its founding and built a substantial global presence, headquartered in London, UK — a major financial hub. Amana Capital operates out of Beirut, Lebanon.
While Amana Capital's track record is commendable, it's worth noting that our overall scoring system weighs regulation, fees, and accessibility more heavily than age alone, which is why Capital.com still comes out on top overall.
On our independent rating system, Capital.com scores 3.96/5 against Amana Capital's 3.21/5 — a clear and consistent gap across regulation, fees, and accessibility categories. Capital.com wins our awards for Best Overall, Best for Low Fees, and Best for Regulation.
Amana Capital does claim one award in our matrix — Best for Beginners — reflecting its straightforward MT4/MT5 setup that many new traders find familiar from educational content online. Still, Capital.com's lower $20 minimum deposit arguably makes it just as approachable for newcomers.
For the vast majority of traders, Capital.com represents the stronger overall package. Amana Capital remains a viable niche choice for MetaTrader loyalists or those who prioritize an established 2010 founding date over broader regulatory coverage.
The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.
Capital.com edges out Amana Capital overall based on our expert rating score.
Highest Rated
Capital.com
4.0 / 5 / 5
Category winners
Overall winner
Based on overall expert rating (4/5).
Better for beginners
Stronger onboarding and educational resources.
Lower trading costs
More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.
Stronger regulation
Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.
Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
