FBS
Maximum leverage, minimal cost — FBS delivers a professional-grade trading toolkit starting from just $1.
- Min deposit
- $1
- Max leverage
- 1:3000
- Spread from
- 0 pips
- Regulators
- CySEC, ASIC, FSCA
FBS and Revolut Trading serve very different types of investors, but only one delivers a complete trading package. Our research shows FBS pulling ahead with stronger regulation, lower-cost trading, and a far broader market selection. Here's the full breakdown.
Maximum leverage, minimal cost — FBS delivers a professional-grade trading toolkit starting from just $1.
Zero minimum deposit and a familiar app experience make Revolut Trading an easy on-ramp for first-time investors.
Same category, top-tier regulation, and it's currently accepting new traders.
See What Makes It DifferentCore features compared head-to-head.
| Feature | F FBS | RT Revolut Trading |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.9 / 5 | 3.3 / 5 |
| Founded | 2009 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Limassol, Cyprus | London, UK |
| Regulation | CySEC, ASIC, FSCA | FCA, CySEC |
| Fees & Limits | ||
| Min Deposit | $1 | $0 |
| Spreads From | 0 pips | 0 pips |
| Commission | None | None |
| Max Leverage | 1:3000 | 1:5 |
| Platforms & Markets | ||
| Trading Platforms | MT4, MT5, Proprietary Mobile | Revolut App |
| Markets Offered | Forex, Cfd, Stocks, Indices, Commodities, Crypto | Stocks, Etf, Crypto, Commodities |
FBS
$1
Revolut Trading
$0
FBS
0 pips
Revolut Trading
0 pips
FBS
None
Revolut Trading
None
FBS
None
Revolut Trading
None
FBS
None
Revolut Trading
None
FBS is the stronger all-around broker, earning a 3.9/5 on our independent rating versus Revolut Trading's 3.3/5. FBS wins on regulatory depth, leverage flexibility, and market variety, while Revolut Trading's only real edge is its $0 minimum deposit, making it a niche pick for absolute beginners with very small starting capital.
Both brokers operate under reputable regulatory umbrellas, but FBS holds the edge in sheer licensing breadth. FBS is regulated by CySEC, ASIC, and FSCA — three distinct tier-1 and tier-2 authorities spanning Europe, Australia, and South Africa.
Revolut Trading, by comparison, is overseen by the FCA and CySEC. While these are respected regulators, having only two licences versus FBS's three means slightly less jurisdictional redundancy for traders operating across regions.
For traders who prioritize fund safety and multi-jurisdictional oversight, FBS's broader regulatory footprint gives it a measurable advantage in our scoring model.
Cost is where both brokers compete closely on paper, but the full picture favors FBS. Both platforms advertise spreads starting from 0 pips with no commission charged on standard trading activity.
Neither broker charges deposit or withdrawal fees, which is a welcome feature for cost-conscious traders on both sides. However, FBS's dramatically lower minimum deposit requirement of just $1 (versus Revolut Trading's $0) is nearly negligible, meaning both are accessible to traders with minimal starting capital.
Where FBS pulls ahead is in overall value density — its zero-commission structure is paired with access to six market categories, giving traders more ways to put their capital to work without added cost layers.
FBS supports the industry-standard MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 platforms, plus its own proprietary mobile app. This gives traders access to advanced charting, automated strategies via Expert Advisors, and a well-established third-party tool ecosystem.
Revolut Trading, on the other hand, operates exclusively through the Revolut App. This is a streamlined, consumer-friendly interface, but it lacks the depth of customization, algorithmic trading support, and technical analysis tools that serious traders expect from MT4/MT5.
For anyone planning to scale into more advanced trading strategies, FBS's platform ecosystem is simply more capable and future-proof.
FBS offers leverage up to 1:3000, a figure aimed squarely at experienced forex traders who want maximum capital efficiency. Revolut Trading caps leverage at a much more conservative 1:5.
This gap is significant: FBS's leverage ceiling suits active forex and CFD traders, while Revolut Trading's modest leverage is more aligned with long-term investors who are less concerned with margin trading.
On market breadth, FBS again leads with access to Forex, CFDs, Stocks, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto — six categories in total. Revolut Trading covers Stocks, ETFs, Crypto, and Commodities, four categories that skew toward passive investing rather than active trading.
Revolut Trading's biggest selling point is its $0 minimum deposit combined with the familiar, app-based Revolut ecosystem many users already use for banking. This makes it an approachable entry point for first-time investors who want simplicity over sophistication.
FBS, while slightly more feature-dense, still maintains an extremely low $1 minimum deposit, making it nearly as accessible on the cost front while offering a dramatically more powerful trading environment.
Beginners who only want basic stock or crypto exposure through an app they already trust may lean toward Revolut Trading, but anyone planning to grow into forex, indices, or leveraged CFD trading will outgrow it quickly.
FBS is the clear overall winner in this matchup, scoring 3.9/5 versus Revolut Trading's 3.3/5 on our independent rating system. It wins on regulation, leverage, platform depth, and market variety — four of the most important criteria for serious traders.
Revolut Trading remains a reasonable option purely for beginners dipping a toe into investing with zero starting capital, but it cannot match FBS's overall package.
For the majority of forex, CFD, and multi-asset traders, FBS offers a stronger, more complete, and more cost-efficient trading experience in 2026.
The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.
FBS edges out Revolut Trading overall based on our expert rating score.
Highest Rated
FBS
3.9 / 5 / 5
Category winners
Overall winner
Based on overall expert rating (3.9/5).
Better for beginners
Stronger onboarding and educational resources.
Lower trading costs
More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.
Stronger regulation
Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.
Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Our #1 Pick Right Now: AvaTrade
Same category, top-tier regulation, and it's currently accepting new traders.