Brokers Profile
Reviewed by Experts Updated 10/13/2026

FBS vs Revolut Trading: Which Broker Wins in 2026?

FBS and Revolut Trading serve very different types of investors, but only one delivers a complete trading package. Our research shows FBS pulling ahead with stronger regulation, lower-cost trading, and a far broader market selection. Here's the full breakdown.

OVERALL WINNER
F

FBS

3.9 / 5Score: 2 / 3

Maximum leverage, minimal cost — FBS delivers a professional-grade trading toolkit starting from just $1.

Min deposit
$1
Max leverage
1:3000
Spread from
0 pips
Regulators
CySEC, ASIC, FSCA
RT

Revolut Trading

3.3 / 5Score: 1 / 3

Zero minimum deposit and a familiar app experience make Revolut Trading an easy on-ramp for first-time investors.

Min deposit
$0
Max leverage
1:5
Spread from
0 pips
Regulators
FCA, CySEC

Our #1 Pick Right Now: AvaTrade

Same category, top-tier regulation, and it's currently accepting new traders.

See What Makes It Different
Overall Winner
FBS
Best for Beginners
Revolut Trading
Lowest Fees
FBS
Top Regulation
FBS

Side-by-side comparison

Core features compared head-to-head.

Feature
F
FBS
RT
Revolut Trading
Overview
Rating3.9 / 53.3 / 5
Founded20092018
HeadquartersLimassol, CyprusLondon, UK
RegulationCySEC, ASIC, FSCAFCA, CySEC
Fees & Limits
Min Deposit$1$0
Spreads From0 pips0 pips
CommissionNoneNone
Max Leverage1:30001:5
Platforms & Markets
Trading PlatformsMT4, MT5, Proprietary MobileRevolut App
Markets OfferedForex, Cfd, Stocks, Indices, Commodities, CryptoStocks, Etf, Crypto, Commodities

Trading & non-trading fees

Min Deposit

FBS

$1

Revolut Trading

$0

Spreads From

FBS

0 pips

Revolut Trading

0 pips

Commission

FBS

None

Revolut Trading

None

Deposit Fees

FBS

None

Revolut Trading

None

Withdrawal Fees

FBS

None

Revolut Trading

None

Pros & cons

F

FBS

Pros

  • Backed by three regulatory licences (CySEC, ASIC, FSCA) for stronger oversight
  • Extremely low $1 minimum deposit removes most entry barriers
  • Industry-leading leverage up to 1:3000 for capital-efficient trading
  • Broad six-category market access spanning forex to crypto
  • No commission charges on standard trading activity
  • No deposit or withdrawal fees eating into returns
  • Supports both MT4 and MT5 for flexible strategy automation

Cons

  • High leverage up to 1:3000 carries significant risk for inexperienced traders
  • Proprietary app may feel less polished than dedicated consumer fintech apps
  • MT4/MT5 interface has a steeper learning curve for absolute beginners
  • Founded in 2009, slightly less brand recognition in mainstream consumer markets
RT

Revolut Trading

Pros

  • No minimum deposit makes it accessible to any budget
  • Zero commission on trades keeps costs transparent
  • Integrated into the familiar Revolut banking app ecosystem
  • No deposit or withdrawal fees
  • Regulated by the FCA, a respected tier-1 authority
  • Simple, beginner-friendly interface for casual investors

Cons

  • Limited to just one platform with no MT4/MT5 support
  • Low maximum leverage of 1:5 restricts active trading strategies
  • Fewer market categories (4) compared to competitors
  • Only two regulatory licences versus more diversified competitors
  • Newer entrant founded in 2018 with less long-term track record

Our expert verdict

Editor's verdict

Overall winner FBS
Lowest fees FBS
Best regulation FBS
Better for beginners Revolut Trading

FBS is the stronger all-around broker, earning a 3.9/5 on our independent rating versus Revolut Trading's 3.3/5. FBS wins on regulatory depth, leverage flexibility, and market variety, while Revolut Trading's only real edge is its $0 minimum deposit, making it a niche pick for absolute beginners with very small starting capital.

Regulation & Safety

Both brokers operate under reputable regulatory umbrellas, but FBS holds the edge in sheer licensing breadth. FBS is regulated by CySEC, ASIC, and FSCA — three distinct tier-1 and tier-2 authorities spanning Europe, Australia, and South Africa.

Revolut Trading, by comparison, is overseen by the FCA and CySEC. While these are respected regulators, having only two licences versus FBS's three means slightly less jurisdictional redundancy for traders operating across regions.

For traders who prioritize fund safety and multi-jurisdictional oversight, FBS's broader regulatory footprint gives it a measurable advantage in our scoring model.

Fees, Spreads & Account Costs

Cost is where both brokers compete closely on paper, but the full picture favors FBS. Both platforms advertise spreads starting from 0 pips with no commission charged on standard trading activity.

Neither broker charges deposit or withdrawal fees, which is a welcome feature for cost-conscious traders on both sides. However, FBS's dramatically lower minimum deposit requirement of just $1 (versus Revolut Trading's $0) is nearly negligible, meaning both are accessible to traders with minimal starting capital.

Where FBS pulls ahead is in overall value density — its zero-commission structure is paired with access to six market categories, giving traders more ways to put their capital to work without added cost layers.

Trading Platforms & Tools

FBS supports the industry-standard MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 platforms, plus its own proprietary mobile app. This gives traders access to advanced charting, automated strategies via Expert Advisors, and a well-established third-party tool ecosystem.

Revolut Trading, on the other hand, operates exclusively through the Revolut App. This is a streamlined, consumer-friendly interface, but it lacks the depth of customization, algorithmic trading support, and technical analysis tools that serious traders expect from MT4/MT5.

For anyone planning to scale into more advanced trading strategies, FBS's platform ecosystem is simply more capable and future-proof.

Leverage & Market Access

FBS offers leverage up to 1:3000, a figure aimed squarely at experienced forex traders who want maximum capital efficiency. Revolut Trading caps leverage at a much more conservative 1:5.

This gap is significant: FBS's leverage ceiling suits active forex and CFD traders, while Revolut Trading's modest leverage is more aligned with long-term investors who are less concerned with margin trading.

On market breadth, FBS again leads with access to Forex, CFDs, Stocks, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto — six categories in total. Revolut Trading covers Stocks, ETFs, Crypto, and Commodities, four categories that skew toward passive investing rather than active trading.

Ease of Use & Beginner Accessibility

Revolut Trading's biggest selling point is its $0 minimum deposit combined with the familiar, app-based Revolut ecosystem many users already use for banking. This makes it an approachable entry point for first-time investors who want simplicity over sophistication.

FBS, while slightly more feature-dense, still maintains an extremely low $1 minimum deposit, making it nearly as accessible on the cost front while offering a dramatically more powerful trading environment.

Beginners who only want basic stock or crypto exposure through an app they already trust may lean toward Revolut Trading, but anyone planning to grow into forex, indices, or leveraged CFD trading will outgrow it quickly.

Our Verdict

FBS is the clear overall winner in this matchup, scoring 3.9/5 versus Revolut Trading's 3.3/5 on our independent rating system. It wins on regulation, leverage, platform depth, and market variety — four of the most important criteria for serious traders.

Revolut Trading remains a reasonable option purely for beginners dipping a toe into investing with zero starting capital, but it cannot match FBS's overall package.

For the majority of forex, CFD, and multi-asset traders, FBS offers a stronger, more complete, and more cost-efficient trading experience in 2026.

Verdict summary

The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.

Editor's verdict

FBS wins overall

FBS edges out Revolut Trading overall based on our expert rating score.

F

Highest Rated

FBS

3.9 / 5 / 5

Category winners

  • Overall winner

    Based on overall expert rating (3.9/5).

    FBS
  • Better for beginners

    Stronger onboarding and educational resources.

    Revolut Trading
  • Lower trading costs

    More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.

    FBS
  • Stronger regulation

    Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.

    FBS

Frequently asked questions

Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

Our #1 Pick Right Now: AvaTrade

Same category, top-tier regulation, and it's currently accepting new traders.

See What Makes It Different
BP AI