Fusion Markets
Zero-dollar entry, tier-1 regulation, and six asset classes on professional-grade platforms — built for traders who want more for less.
- Min deposit
- $0
- Max leverage
- 1:500
- Spread from
- 0 pips
- Regulators
- ASIC
Fusion Markets and M1 Finance serve very different trading audiences, but when measured head-to-head on fees, regulation, and accessibility, one platform pulls ahead. Our research gives Fusion Markets a 3.6/5 rating compared to M1 Finance's 3.2/5. Here's exactly why — and who each broker still makes sense for.
Zero-dollar entry, tier-1 regulation, and six asset classes on professional-grade platforms — built for traders who want more for less.
Commission-free stock investing made simple for hands-off, long-term U.S. investors.
Core features compared head-to-head.
| Feature | FM Fusion Markets | MF M1 Finance |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.6 / 5 | 3.2 / 5 |
| Founded | 2017 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Melbourne, Australia | Chicago, USA |
| Regulation | ASIC | SEC |
| Fees & Limits | ||
| Min Deposit | $0 | $100 |
| Spreads From | 0 pips | 0 pips |
| Commission | $2.25/lot | None |
| Max Leverage | 1:500 | 1:2 |
| Platforms & Markets | ||
| Trading Platforms | MT4, MT5, TradingView | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile |
| Markets Offered | Forex, Cfd, Stocks, Indices, Commodities, Crypto | Stocks, Indices |
Fusion Markets
$0
M1 Finance
$100
Fusion Markets
0 pips
M1 Finance
0 pips
Fusion Markets
$2.25/lot
M1 Finance
None
Fusion Markets
None
M1 Finance
None
Fusion Markets
None
M1 Finance
None
Fusion Markets is our top pick overall, earning a 3.6/5 on our rating scale versus M1 Finance's 3.2/5. It wins on cost structure with a $0 minimum deposit and tight 0-pip spreads, offers far higher leverage up to 1:500, and supports a broader range of markets including forex, CFDs, stocks, indices, commodities, and crypto through industry-standard platforms like MT4, MT5, and TradingView. M1 Finance remains a credible, SEC-regulated alternative for U.S.-based investors who specifically want a commission-free, buy-and-hold style stock investing app, but it falls short for active traders due to its minimal leverage, narrower market selection, and higher $100 minimum deposit.
Fusion Markets is regulated by ASIC (Australian Securities and Investments Commission), a well-respected tier-1 regulator known for strict capital adequacy and client fund segregation rules. This gives forex and CFD traders a strong layer of protection when trading leveraged products.
M1 Finance operates under SEC oversight in the United States, which is appropriate given its focus on long-term stock and ETF investing rather than leveraged derivatives trading. Both regulatory regimes are considered tier-1 and reputable in their respective jurisdictions.
The key distinction isn't regulatory strength but regulatory scope — Fusion Markets' ASIC license covers a much wider product suite including forex and crypto CFDs, while M1 Finance's SEC registration is tailored strictly to equities and ETF brokerage activity.
Both brokers advertise spreads starting from 0 pips, but the overall cost picture differs once you factor in commissions and account minimums. Fusion Markets charges a transparent $2.25 per lot commission on its raw spread accounts, a competitive rate for active forex and CFD traders.
M1 Finance charges no per-trade commission at all, which suits passive investors making infrequent stock purchases. However, this model is less relevant for traders who need tight, volume-based pricing on frequently traded instruments like currency pairs.
Neither broker charges deposit or withdrawal fees, which is a welcome point of parity. Where Fusion Markets pulls ahead decisively is accessibility — a $0 minimum deposit versus M1 Finance's $100 requirement makes Fusion Markets easier for newer or smaller-capital traders to get started.
Fusion Markets supports the industry-standard MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, and TradingView platforms. This trio gives traders access to advanced charting, algorithmic trading via Expert Advisors, custom indicators, and a huge library of third-party tools and signals.
M1 Finance relies solely on its own proprietary web and mobile platforms. These are clean, beginner-friendly, and well-suited to automated 'pie'-based portfolio investing, but they lack the depth of technical analysis and automation tools that active traders expect.
For traders who value flexibility, backtesting, and multi-device charting continuity, Fusion Markets' platform lineup is significantly more capable. M1 Finance's simplicity is a feature for passive investors but a limitation for anyone trading more actively.
Fusion Markets offers access to six asset classes: forex, CFDs, stocks, indices, commodities, and crypto, with leverage up to 1:500 on eligible accounts. This breadth makes it suitable for diversified trading strategies across multiple markets from one account.
M1 Finance is limited to stocks and indices, with leverage capped at just 1:2 through its margin investing feature. This reflects its design as a long-term investing app rather than a leveraged trading platform.
Traders who want exposure to currencies, commodities, or crypto will find M1 Finance's offering too narrow, while Fusion Markets caters to both short-term traders and multi-asset portfolio builders.
Fusion Markets was founded in 2017 and is headquartered in Melbourne, Australia. Despite being the newer of the two brokers, it has built a reputation around transparent, low-cost pricing and has scaled quickly within the retail forex space.
M1 Finance, founded in 2015 and based in Chicago, USA, has a slightly longer operating history and has carved out a loyal following among passive U.S. investors who like its automated investing approach.
Both companies are established enough to be considered reliable choices in their respective niches, though Fusion Markets' broader regulatory footprint and product suite give it an edge for traders seeking one platform to cover multiple markets.
Weighing all criteria together, Fusion Markets earns the higher overall rating of 3.6/5 compared to M1 Finance's 3.2/5. It wins on cost accessibility, leverage, platform choice, and market breadth, making it the stronger all-around pick for most traders in 2026.
M1 Finance still holds genuine appeal for a specific audience — U.S.-based, buy-and-hold investors who want commission-free stock and ETF investing without the complexity of leveraged trading. If that describes your goals, M1 Finance remains a sound choice.
For everyone else, particularly those interested in forex, CFDs, or multi-asset trading with professional-grade platforms, Fusion Markets offers the more complete and cost-effective package.
The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.
Fusion Markets edges out M1 Finance overall based on our expert rating score.
Highest Rated
Fusion Markets
3.6 / 5 / 5
Category winners
Overall winner
Based on overall expert rating (3.6/5).
Better for beginners
Stronger onboarding and educational resources.
Lower trading costs
More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.
Stronger regulation
Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.
Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.