Brokers Profile
Reviewed by Experts Updated 10/20/2026

Fusion Markets vs M1 Finance: Which Broker Wins in 2026?

Fusion Markets and M1 Finance serve very different trading audiences, but when measured head-to-head on fees, regulation, and accessibility, one platform pulls ahead. Our research gives Fusion Markets a 3.6/5 rating compared to M1 Finance's 3.2/5. Here's exactly why — and who each broker still makes sense for.

OVERALL WINNER
FM

Fusion Markets

3.6 / 5Score: 2 / 3

Zero-dollar entry, tier-1 regulation, and six asset classes on professional-grade platforms — built for traders who want more for less.

Min deposit
$0
Max leverage
1:500
Spread from
0 pips
Regulators
ASIC
MF

M1 Finance

3.2 / 5Score: 1 / 3

Commission-free stock investing made simple for hands-off, long-term U.S. investors.

Min deposit
$100
Max leverage
1:2
Spread from
0 pips
Regulators
SEC
Overall Winner
Fusion Markets
Best for Beginners
Fusion Markets
Lowest Fees
Fusion Markets
Top Regulation
Fusion Markets

Side-by-side comparison

Core features compared head-to-head.

Feature
FM
Fusion Markets
MF
M1 Finance
Overview
Rating3.6 / 53.2 / 5
Founded20172015
HeadquartersMelbourne, AustraliaChicago, USA
RegulationASICSEC
Fees & Limits
Min Deposit$0$100
Spreads From0 pips0 pips
Commission$2.25/lotNone
Max Leverage1:5001:2
Platforms & Markets
Trading PlatformsMT4, MT5, TradingViewProprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile
Markets OfferedForex, Cfd, Stocks, Indices, Commodities, CryptoStocks, Indices

Trading & non-trading fees

Min Deposit

Fusion Markets

$0

M1 Finance

$100

Spreads From

Fusion Markets

0 pips

M1 Finance

0 pips

Commission

Fusion Markets

$2.25/lot

M1 Finance

None

Deposit Fees

Fusion Markets

None

M1 Finance

None

Withdrawal Fees

Fusion Markets

None

M1 Finance

None

Pros & cons

FM

Fusion Markets

Pros

  • No minimum deposit required, making it highly accessible to new traders
  • Higher overall rating of 3.6/5 based on our independent research
  • Significantly higher maximum leverage of up to 1:500
  • Broader market access across six distinct asset classes
  • Industry-standard platform support including MT4, MT5, and TradingView
  • Transparent, competitive commission structure for active traders
  • Strong tier-1 ASIC regulatory oversight

Cons

  • High leverage carries increased risk for inexperienced traders
  • Commission-based pricing may be less intuitive for casual investors
  • Narrower long-term investing tools compared to dedicated stock platforms
  • Newer company (founded 2017) with a shorter track record than some competitors
  • No proprietary platform option for traders who prefer an all-in-one branded app
MF

M1 Finance

Pros

  • No per-trade commission on stock and ETF investing
  • Longer operating history, established since 2015
  • Simple, beginner-friendly proprietary platform experience
  • Reputable SEC regulatory framework
  • No deposit or withdrawal fees charged

Cons

  • Higher minimum deposit requirement of $100
  • Very limited leverage, capped at just 1:2
  • Narrow market access limited to stocks and indices only
  • No support for MT4, MT5, or TradingView platforms
  • Lower overall rating of 3.2/5 based on our independent research

Our expert verdict

Editor's verdict

Overall winner Fusion Markets
Lowest fees Fusion Markets
Best regulation Fusion Markets
Better for beginners Fusion Markets

Fusion Markets is our top pick overall, earning a 3.6/5 on our rating scale versus M1 Finance's 3.2/5. It wins on cost structure with a $0 minimum deposit and tight 0-pip spreads, offers far higher leverage up to 1:500, and supports a broader range of markets including forex, CFDs, stocks, indices, commodities, and crypto through industry-standard platforms like MT4, MT5, and TradingView. M1 Finance remains a credible, SEC-regulated alternative for U.S.-based investors who specifically want a commission-free, buy-and-hold style stock investing app, but it falls short for active traders due to its minimal leverage, narrower market selection, and higher $100 minimum deposit.

Regulation & Safety

Fusion Markets is regulated by ASIC (Australian Securities and Investments Commission), a well-respected tier-1 regulator known for strict capital adequacy and client fund segregation rules. This gives forex and CFD traders a strong layer of protection when trading leveraged products.

M1 Finance operates under SEC oversight in the United States, which is appropriate given its focus on long-term stock and ETF investing rather than leveraged derivatives trading. Both regulatory regimes are considered tier-1 and reputable in their respective jurisdictions.

The key distinction isn't regulatory strength but regulatory scope — Fusion Markets' ASIC license covers a much wider product suite including forex and crypto CFDs, while M1 Finance's SEC registration is tailored strictly to equities and ETF brokerage activity.

Fees, Spreads & Commissions

Both brokers advertise spreads starting from 0 pips, but the overall cost picture differs once you factor in commissions and account minimums. Fusion Markets charges a transparent $2.25 per lot commission on its raw spread accounts, a competitive rate for active forex and CFD traders.

M1 Finance charges no per-trade commission at all, which suits passive investors making infrequent stock purchases. However, this model is less relevant for traders who need tight, volume-based pricing on frequently traded instruments like currency pairs.

Neither broker charges deposit or withdrawal fees, which is a welcome point of parity. Where Fusion Markets pulls ahead decisively is accessibility — a $0 minimum deposit versus M1 Finance's $100 requirement makes Fusion Markets easier for newer or smaller-capital traders to get started.

Trading Platforms & Tools

Fusion Markets supports the industry-standard MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, and TradingView platforms. This trio gives traders access to advanced charting, algorithmic trading via Expert Advisors, custom indicators, and a huge library of third-party tools and signals.

M1 Finance relies solely on its own proprietary web and mobile platforms. These are clean, beginner-friendly, and well-suited to automated 'pie'-based portfolio investing, but they lack the depth of technical analysis and automation tools that active traders expect.

For traders who value flexibility, backtesting, and multi-device charting continuity, Fusion Markets' platform lineup is significantly more capable. M1 Finance's simplicity is a feature for passive investors but a limitation for anyone trading more actively.

Market Access & Leverage

Fusion Markets offers access to six asset classes: forex, CFDs, stocks, indices, commodities, and crypto, with leverage up to 1:500 on eligible accounts. This breadth makes it suitable for diversified trading strategies across multiple markets from one account.

M1 Finance is limited to stocks and indices, with leverage capped at just 1:2 through its margin investing feature. This reflects its design as a long-term investing app rather than a leveraged trading platform.

Traders who want exposure to currencies, commodities, or crypto will find M1 Finance's offering too narrow, while Fusion Markets caters to both short-term traders and multi-asset portfolio builders.

Company Background & Trustworthiness

Fusion Markets was founded in 2017 and is headquartered in Melbourne, Australia. Despite being the newer of the two brokers, it has built a reputation around transparent, low-cost pricing and has scaled quickly within the retail forex space.

M1 Finance, founded in 2015 and based in Chicago, USA, has a slightly longer operating history and has carved out a loyal following among passive U.S. investors who like its automated investing approach.

Both companies are established enough to be considered reliable choices in their respective niches, though Fusion Markets' broader regulatory footprint and product suite give it an edge for traders seeking one platform to cover multiple markets.

Our Verdict

Weighing all criteria together, Fusion Markets earns the higher overall rating of 3.6/5 compared to M1 Finance's 3.2/5. It wins on cost accessibility, leverage, platform choice, and market breadth, making it the stronger all-around pick for most traders in 2026.

M1 Finance still holds genuine appeal for a specific audience — U.S.-based, buy-and-hold investors who want commission-free stock and ETF investing without the complexity of leveraged trading. If that describes your goals, M1 Finance remains a sound choice.

For everyone else, particularly those interested in forex, CFDs, or multi-asset trading with professional-grade platforms, Fusion Markets offers the more complete and cost-effective package.

Verdict summary

The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.

Editor's verdict

Fusion Markets wins overall

Fusion Markets edges out M1 Finance overall based on our expert rating score.

FM

Highest Rated

Fusion Markets

3.6 / 5 / 5

Visit Fusion Markets

Category winners

  • Overall winner

    Based on overall expert rating (3.6/5).

    Fusion Markets
  • Better for beginners

    Stronger onboarding and educational resources.

    Fusion Markets
  • Lower trading costs

    More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.

    Fusion Markets
  • Stronger regulation

    Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.

    Fusion Markets

Frequently asked questions

Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

BP AI