IG Group
A globally regulated multi-asset powerhouse built for serious traders who demand depth, leverage, and platform choice.
- Min deposit
- $250
- Max leverage
- 1:200
- Spread from
- 0.6 pips
- Regulators
- FCA, ASIC, MAS, SEC
IG Group and Stash serve very different types of investors, but only one comes out on top in our independent 2026 rating. IG Group scores 4.3/5 against Stash's 3.3/5, driven largely by superior regulation and market access. Stash still holds appeal for cost-conscious beginners thanks to its $0 minimum deposit and tighter headline spreads.
A globally regulated multi-asset powerhouse built for serious traders who demand depth, leverage, and platform choice.
A zero-minimum-deposit investing app built to make simple stock, ETF, and crypto investing accessible to everyday beginners.
Core features compared head-to-head.
| Feature | IG IG Group | S Stash |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 3.3 / 5 |
| Founded | 1974 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | London, UK | New York, USA |
| Regulation | FCA, ASIC, MAS, SEC | SEC, FINRA |
| Fees & Limits | ||
| Min Deposit | $250 | $0 |
| Spreads From | 0.6 pips | 0 pips |
| Commission | None | None |
| Max Leverage | 1:200 | 1:1 |
| Platforms & Markets | ||
| Trading Platforms | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile, MT4 | Proprietary Mobile, Proprietary Web |
| Markets Offered | Cfd, Forex, Stocks, Indices, Commodities, Crypto | Stocks, Etf, Crypto |
IG Group
$250
Stash
$0
IG Group
0.6 pips
Stash
0 pips
IG Group
None
Stash
None
IG Group
None
Stash
None
IG Group
None
Stash
None
IG Group is our recommended pick overall, earning 4.3/5 on our proprietary rating scale compared to Stash's 3.3/5. The gap is driven primarily by regulatory depth — IG Group is licensed by four tier-1 regulators (FCA, ASIC, MAS, SEC) versus Stash's two (SEC, FINRA) — plus a far wider range of tradable markets including forex, indices, commodities and CFDs. Stash counters with a $0 minimum deposit and marginally tighter advertised spreads, making it a reasonable entry point for first-time stock and ETF investors, but it simply doesn't match IG Group's depth for traders who want multi-asset access, higher leverage, or institutional-grade oversight.
Regulatory strength is where this comparison is decided most decisively. IG Group is overseen by four major regulators — the FCA, ASIC, MAS, and SEC — giving it one of the broadest compliance footprints in the retail brokerage space.
Stash, by contrast, is regulated solely by the SEC and FINRA in the United States. That's a credible setup for a US-focused investing app, but it lacks the multi-jurisdictional oversight that international or cross-border traders typically look for.
For traders who prioritize fund safety and regulatory redundancy, IG Group's four-licence structure offers meaningfully stronger protection. Stash remains adequate for domestic US investors who don't need international regulatory coverage.
Stash wins on accessibility, requiring no minimum deposit at all, compared to IG Group's $250 entry threshold. This makes Stash notably easier for beginners or those testing the waters with limited capital.
Both brokers charge no deposit or withdrawal fees, so funding and accessing your account carries no hidden cost on either platform.
However, a low minimum deposit alone doesn't offset the narrower market access and lower leverage ceiling that come with choosing Stash. Traders should weigh entry cost against long-term platform capability.
On pure headline pricing, Stash edges ahead with spreads advertised from 0 pips, versus IG Group's spreads starting at 0.6 pips. Neither broker charges a separate commission on trades.
That said, spread comparisons need context. IG Group's 0.6 pip starting spread applies across a much wider range of instruments including forex and CFDs, while Stash's 0 pip figure is tied to its simpler stock and ETF offering.
For cost-sensitive investors trading primarily stocks and ETFs, Stash's fee structure is competitive. For multi-asset traders, IG Group's pricing remains reasonable given the added market depth.
IG Group offers access to six market categories — CFDs, forex, stocks, indices, commodities, and crypto — compared to Stash's three: stocks, ETFs, and crypto. This makes IG Group the clear choice for traders wanting diversified exposure from a single account.
Leverage is another area of separation. IG Group supports leverage up to 1:200, while Stash caps out at 1:1, reflecting its design as a straightforward investing app rather than a leveraged trading platform.
Active traders and those interested in forex or CFD speculation will find IG Group's leverage and market range far better suited to their needs.
IG Group supports its own proprietary web and mobile platforms alongside MetaTrader 4 (MT4), giving traders flexibility to use a globally recognized third-party platform alongside IG's in-house tools.
Stash offers only its proprietary mobile and web apps, with no MT4 or other third-party platform integration. This keeps things simple but limits flexibility for traders who prefer advanced charting or automated strategy tools.
Traders who rely on MT4 indicators, expert advisors, or custom scripts will find IG Group's platform lineup significantly more capable.
IG Group is the stronger all-around broker, backed by a 4.3/5 rating versus Stash's 3.3/5 on our independent scale. Its regulatory depth, wider market access, higher leverage, and MT4 support make it the better fit for the majority of traders.
Stash remains a sensible option specifically for beginners with limited starting capital who want simple stock, ETF, and crypto exposure without a minimum deposit barrier.
If you need a single, do-it-all platform with institutional-grade oversight, choose IG Group. If you're a cost-conscious beginner starting small with stocks and ETFs, Stash is a reasonable entry point.
The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.
IG Group edges out Stash overall based on our expert rating score.
Highest Rated
IG Group
4.3 / 5 / 5
Category winners
Overall winner
Based on overall expert rating (4.3/5).
Better for beginners
Stronger onboarding and educational resources.
Lower trading costs
More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.
Stronger regulation
Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.
Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.