LHV
A two-decade-old, dual-regulated broker offering zero minimum deposit and multi-asset access.
- Min deposit
- $0
- Max leverage
- 1:5
- Spread from
- 0 pips
- Regulators
- Finantsinspektsioon, FCA
LHV and Moneybox both cater to cost-conscious investors, but only one delivers a genuinely stronger all-round package in 2026. LHV edges ahead with broader regulation, no minimum deposit, and a wider range of tradable markets. Here's our full breakdown.
A two-decade-old, dual-regulated broker offering zero minimum deposit and multi-asset access.
A mobile-first UK investing app built for simple, low-barrier stocks and ETF investing.
Same category, top-tier regulation, and it's currently accepting new traders.
See What Makes It DifferentCore features compared head-to-head.
| Feature | L LHV | M Moneybox |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.4 / 5 | 3.2 / 5 |
| Founded | 1999 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Tallinn, Estonia | London, UK |
| Regulation | Finantsinspektsioon, FCA | FCA |
| Fees & Limits | ||
| Min Deposit | $0 | $1 |
| Spreads From | 0 pips | 0 pips |
| Commission | None | None |
| Max Leverage | 1:5 | 1:1 |
| Platforms & Markets | ||
| Trading Platforms | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile, LHV Broker | Proprietary Mobile, Proprietary Web |
| Markets Offered | Stocks, Etf, Crypto, Indices | Etf, Stocks |
LHV
$0
Moneybox
$1
LHV
0 pips
Moneybox
0 pips
LHV
None
Moneybox
None
LHV
None
Moneybox
None
LHV
None
Moneybox
None
LHV is the better choice overall, scoring 3.4/5 versus Moneybox's 3.2/5 on our independent rating system. LHV wins on regulatory depth, minimum deposit accessibility, leverage availability, and market breadth, while Moneybox's zero-pip spreads keep it competitive purely on cost for simple ETF investing.
LHV operates under the oversight of Finantsinspektsioon (Estonia's financial regulator) as well as the UK's FCA, giving it two tier-1 regulatory licences. This dual-jurisdiction coverage provides an added layer of investor protection and signals a broker built for cross-border credibility.
Moneybox, by contrast, is regulated solely by the FCA. While the FCA is a respected tier-1 regulator in its own right, having only a single licence means Moneybox's regulatory footprint is narrower than LHV's.
On our proprietary scoring system, LHV earned a perfect 2/2 regulatory score, while Moneybox scored 0/2 in this category, reflecting the gap in jurisdictional coverage. For traders prioritizing multi-region oversight, LHV holds a clear structural advantage.
Both brokers advertise spreads starting from 0 pips, so on pure headline pricing they're evenly matched. Neither broker charges a commission on standard trades, and both skip deposit and withdrawal fees entirely, which is a strong consumer-friendly signal from each platform.
Where the two diverge is accessibility. LHV requires no minimum deposit at all, letting new investors open an account and start with whatever amount they're comfortable committing. Moneybox asks for a modest $1 minimum, which is still low by industry standards but technically places a small barrier LHV simply doesn't have.
For cost-sensitive traders, this makes LHV marginally more flexible for first-time depositors, even though both platforms remain highly competitive on fees overall.
LHV offers maximum leverage of up to 1:5, giving active traders some room to amplify positions responsibly. Moneybox caps leverage at 1:1, meaning all positions are effectively unleveraged cash-based investments.
This difference matters depending on your trading style. Buy-and-hold investors focused purely on long-term ETF or stock accumulation may not notice the gap, but anyone wanting tactical flexibility will find LHV's leverage ceiling more accommodating.
It's worth noting neither broker offers particularly aggressive leverage compared to CFD-focused platforms, which suggests both are positioned more toward conservative, long-term investing rather than high-frequency speculative trading.
LHV supports three platform options: a Proprietary Web platform, a Proprietary Mobile app, and the dedicated LHV Broker platform. This trio gives traders flexibility to choose between desktop-style control and on-the-go mobile convenience.
Moneybox offers two platforms — Proprietary Mobile and Proprietary Web — which covers the essentials but doesn't match LHV's extra dedicated broker interface.
On market access, LHV again pulls ahead with Stocks, ETFs, Crypto, and Indices available to trade. Moneybox restricts its offering to Stocks and ETFs only, meaning crypto and indices exposure simply isn't possible on its platform. Investors wanting a one-stop-shop across asset classes will find LHV considerably more versatile.
LHV was founded in 1999 and is headquartered in Tallinn, Estonia, giving it over two decades of operating history and a long-standing presence in the European financial sector.
Moneybox is a newer entrant, founded in 2015 and based in London, UK. While younger, Moneybox has built a focused reputation primarily around simplified stocks and ETF investing for retail users in the UK market.
Longevity isn't everything, but LHV's extended track record may offer additional reassurance to investors who weigh institutional history as part of their due diligence.
Taking everything into account, LHV is our recommended pick in this comparison, scoring 3.4/5 versus Moneybox's 3.2/5 on our independent rating. It wins on regulatory breadth, minimum deposit accessibility, leverage flexibility, platform variety, and market selection.
Moneybox remains a perfectly reasonable option for UK-based investors who specifically want a streamlined, mobile-first ETF and stock investing experience with a single FCA licence. But for traders seeking a more complete, flexible, and internationally regulated package, LHV offers the stronger overall proposition.
The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.
LHV edges out Moneybox overall based on our expert rating score.
Highest Rated
LHV
3.4 / 5 / 5
Category winners
Overall winner
Based on overall expert rating (3.4/5).
Better for beginners
Stronger onboarding and educational resources.
Lower trading costs
More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.
Stronger regulation
Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.
Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Our #1 Pick Right Now: AvaTrade
Same category, top-tier regulation, and it's currently accepting new traders.