Longbridge
Dual-regulated, multi-asset access with zero-commission trading across stocks, ETFs, options, and indices.
- Min deposit
- $0
- Max leverage
- 1:5
- Spread from
- 0 pips
- Regulators
- SFC, MAS
Longbridge and Betterment both offer commission-free access to stocks with no minimum deposit, but they serve very different investor profiles. Our research gives Longbridge the edge overall with a 3.4/5 rating versus Betterment's 3.2/5, driven by broader market access and stronger regulatory coverage.
Dual-regulated, multi-asset access with zero-commission trading across stocks, ETFs, options, and indices.
A long-established, US-regulated platform built for simple, goal-oriented stock and index investing.
Core features compared head-to-head.
| Feature | L Longbridge | B Betterment |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.4 / 5 | 3.2 / 5 |
| Founded | 2019 | 2008 |
| Headquarters | Hong Kong | New York, USA |
| Regulation | SFC, MAS | SEC |
| Fees & Limits | ||
| Min Deposit | $0 | $0 |
| Spreads From | 0 pips | 0 pips |
| Commission | None | None |
| Max Leverage | 1:5 | 1:1 |
| Platforms & Markets | ||
| Trading Platforms | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile |
| Markets Offered | Stocks, Etf, Options, Indices | Stocks, Indices |
Longbridge
$0
Betterment
$0
Longbridge
0 pips
Betterment
0 pips
Longbridge
None
Betterment
None
Longbridge
None
Betterment
None
Longbridge
None
Betterment
None
Longbridge is our top pick in this matchup, earning a 3.4/5 rating compared to Betterment's 3.2/5. It wins on regulatory breadth (SFC and MAS versus SEC alone), offers modest leverage of up to 1:5 where Betterment offers none, and spans four asset classes versus Betterment's two. Betterment still holds appeal for US-based passive investors who value its long track record since 2008, but for traders wanting flexibility and a wider product shelf, Longbridge is the stronger overall package.
Both brokers operate under credible, tier-1 regulatory oversight, so account safety is not a major differentiator in terms of legitimacy — but the breadth of coverage differs. Longbridge is regulated by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) in Hong Kong and the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), giving it a dual-jurisdiction footprint across two major Asian financial hubs.
Betterment, by contrast, is overseen solely by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This is a robust single-jurisdiction regulator well-suited to its primarily American client base, but it does not offer the same multi-region licensing structure that Longbridge provides.
For investors who value having a broker regulated in more than one major financial center, Longbridge's dual licensing gives it a slight structural edge. That said, both regulators are considered reputable, and clients of either broker can trade with confidence regarding fund segregation and compliance standards.
On pure pricing, these two brokers are nearly identical on paper. Both Longbridge and Betterment advertise spreads starting from 0 pips, charge no trading commissions, and impose no deposit or withdrawal fees.
Where Longbridge edges ahead is consistency across its wider product range — its 0-pip-from pricing applies across stocks, ETFs, options, and indices, while Betterment's equivalent pricing applies to a narrower stock-and-indices offering.
Neither broker requires a minimum deposit, both sitting at $0, which makes either platform highly accessible to new investors who want to start small. Cost-conscious traders won't find a meaningful difference in day-to-day account fees between the two.
This is where the two platforms diverge most significantly. Longbridge supports four distinct market categories — stocks, ETFs, options, and indices — giving active traders far more flexibility to diversify or hedge within a single account.
Betterment, by comparison, supports just stocks and indices. It is built more around a streamlined, goal-based investing experience rather than broad multi-asset trading.
On leverage, Longbridge offers up to 1:5, useful for traders who want some capital efficiency on select instruments. Betterment offers no leverage (1:1), reinforcing its identity as a conservative, buy-and-hold-style platform rather than an active trading venue.
Both brokers rely on proprietary technology rather than third-party platforms like MetaTrader, offering their own web and mobile applications. This means Longbridge and Betterment both prioritize a tightly integrated, in-house user experience.
Longbridge's proprietary suite is designed with active stock, ETF, and options traders in mind, reflecting its broader asset coverage. Betterment's proprietary platform leans into simplicity, which aligns with its longer history serving automated and passive investors since 2008.
Neither broker supports MetaTrader 4/5 or cTrader, so traders who specifically require those industry-standard platforms will need to look elsewhere regardless of which of these two they're comparing.
Betterment has the longer operating history, founded in 2008 and headquartered in New York, USA — giving it close to two decades of operational experience in the US market. This longevity is a genuine point in its favor for investors who weight company maturity heavily.
Longbridge is the newer entrant, founded in 2019 and based in Hong Kong. Despite being younger, it has rapidly built out a broader regulatory and market footprint that now outpaces Betterment's in terms of licensing jurisdictions and tradable asset classes.
Ultimately, track record alone shouldn't be the deciding factor — Longbridge's faster expansion into multiple markets and regulators suggests a platform investing heavily in growth and infrastructure.
Taking all criteria together, Longbridge comes out ahead with our overall rating of 3.4/5 versus Betterment's 3.2/5. It wins on regulatory breadth, market variety, and available leverage, while matching Betterment on headline fees and minimum deposit requirements.
Betterment remains a credible option, particularly for US-based investors who prioritize simplicity, a long operating history, and a no-leverage, passive investing approach.
For most traders seeking flexibility across asset classes and broader regulatory assurance, however, Longbridge is the stronger all-around choice in this comparison.
The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.
Longbridge edges out Betterment overall based on our expert rating score.
Highest Rated
Longbridge
3.4 / 5 / 5
Category winners
Overall winner
Based on overall expert rating (3.4/5).
Better for beginners
Stronger onboarding and educational resources.
Lower trading costs
More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.
Stronger regulation
Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.
Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.