LYNX Broker
Dual-regulated access to professional-grade trading tools through Trader Workstation.
- Min deposit
- $0
- Max leverage
- 1:5
- Spread from
- 0 pips
- Regulators
- AFM, FCA
LYNX Broker and mBank both offer zero-commission entry with $0 minimum deposits, but they differ sharply in regulatory strength and pricing structure. Our research gives LYNX Broker the edge overall, though mBank remains a credible option for specific trader profiles.
Dual-regulated access to professional-grade trading tools through Trader Workstation.
A long-established Polish brand offering low per-lot commissions for cost-conscious traders.
Same category, top-tier regulation, and it's currently accepting new traders.
See What Makes It DifferentCore features compared head-to-head.
| Feature | LB LYNX Broker | M mBank |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.4 / 5 | 3.3 / 5 |
| Founded | 2006 | 2000 |
| Headquarters | Amsterdam, Netherlands | Warsaw, Poland |
| Regulation | AFM, FCA | KNF |
| Fees & Limits | ||
| Min Deposit | $0 | $0 |
| Spreads From | 0 pips | 0 pips |
| Commission | $4/lot | $0.19/lot |
| Max Leverage | 1:5 | 1:5 |
| Platforms & Markets | ||
| Trading Platforms | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile, Trader Workstation | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile, mBank Trader |
| Markets Offered | Stocks, Etf, Cfd, Forex, Indices | Stocks, Etf, Cfd, Indices, Forex |
LYNX Broker
$0
mBank
$0
LYNX Broker
0 pips
mBank
0 pips
LYNX Broker
$4/lot
mBank
$0.19/lot
LYNX Broker
None
mBank
None
LYNX Broker
None
mBank
None
LYNX Broker is our top pick in this matchup, edging out mBank with a 3.4/5 rating versus 3.3/5. The deciding factors are LYNX Broker's dual-regulation under the FCA and AFM, its tighter per-lot commission structure at scale, and access to Trader Workstation — a professional-grade platform. mBank remains competitive for Polish-based traders who value a long-established local brand (founded in 2000) and a simpler domestic regulatory footprint, but for most international traders prioritizing safety and platform depth, LYNX Broker is the stronger overall package.
Regulatory strength is one of the clearest differentiators in this comparison. LYNX Broker is overseen by both the AFM (Netherlands) and the FCA (United Kingdom), giving it two regulatory licences including one tier-1 authority. This dual coverage means LYNX Broker clients benefit from stricter capital adequacy rules, segregated client funds, and established compensation scheme protections tied to FCA oversight.
mBank, by contrast, holds a single licence from Poland's KNF. While KNF is a legitimate and respected regulator within the EU framework, it does not carry the same global tier-1 reputation as the FCA, and mBank's single-licence structure means less regulatory redundancy if issues arise in one jurisdiction.
For traders who prioritize fund safety above all else, LYNX Broker's broader regulatory umbrella provides a meaningful edge. mBank is still a regulated, legitimate option, but it's better suited to traders comfortable operating primarily within the Polish/EU domestic framework.
Both brokers advertise spreads starting from 0 pips and charge no deposit or withdrawal fees, making headline spread costs identical on paper. The real difference emerges in commission structures: LYNX Broker charges $4 per lot, while mBank charges a much lower $0.19 per lot.
At first glance, mBank's commission looks dramatically cheaper for high-volume forex or CFD traders. However, LYNX Broker's commission structure typically reflects its broader market access and the inclusion of professional tools via Trader Workstation, which can justify the higher per-lot cost for active multi-asset traders.
Cost-conscious traders focused purely on minimizing per-trade commissions on forex and CFDs may find mBank's pricing more attractive. Those who value platform sophistication alongside reasonable costs will likely find LYNX Broker's overall value proposition stronger.
Both LYNX Broker and mBank offer accessible entry points with a $0 minimum deposit requirement, removing barriers for beginner traders testing either platform. Maximum leverage is also matched at 1:5 across both brokers, reflecting conservative retail leverage caps typical of EU-regulated entities.
Since both brokers tie in terms of deposit requirements and leverage ceilings, this category doesn't meaningfully separate the two. Traders shouldn't expect either platform to offer aggressive leverage suited to high-risk short-term strategies.
LYNX Broker supports a Proprietary Web platform, a Proprietary Mobile app, and notably, Trader Workstation (TWS) — a powerful, professional-grade platform widely respected among active and institutional-style traders for its depth of charting, order types, and multi-market access.
mBank offers its own Proprietary Web and Mobile platforms alongside mBank Trader, a platform built specifically around its domestic market offering. This makes mBank a comfortable choice for traders who are already embedded in the Polish banking and brokerage ecosystem.
For traders seeking institutional-grade tools and broader asset class navigation, LYNX Broker's inclusion of Trader Workstation gives it a clear platform-depth advantage over mBank's more regionally-focused software suite.
Both brokers provide access to a comparable range of markets: Stocks, ETFs, CFDs, Forex, and Indices. There's no meaningful difference in asset class breadth between the two platforms, so traders seeking multi-asset diversification will find either broker adequate on paper.
The real distinction lies in execution venue depth and regional market specialization rather than the headline asset categories, with LYNX Broker's TWS integration typically offering more granular global exchange access for stock and ETF traders.
mBank holds a longevity advantage, having been founded in 2000 and headquartered in Warsaw, Poland, compared to LYNX Broker's founding in 2006 out of Amsterdam, Netherlands. Six extra years of operating history gives mBank a slightly more established brand presence, particularly within its home market.
That said, longevity alone doesn't outweigh regulatory breadth or platform capability in our overall scoring. LYNX Broker's newer but more internationally-oriented structure has allowed it to build a stronger multi-jurisdiction regulatory profile in less time.
The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.
LYNX Broker edges out mBank overall based on our expert rating score.
Highest Rated
LYNX Broker
3.4 / 5 / 5
Category winners
Overall winner
Based on overall expert rating (3.4/5).
Better for beginners
Stronger onboarding and educational resources.
Lower trading costs
More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.
Stronger regulation
Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.
Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Our #1 Pick Right Now: AvaTrade
Same category, top-tier regulation, and it's currently accepting new traders.