Brokers Profile
Reviewed by Experts Updated 10/13/2026

Markets.com vs Equiti: Which Broker Wins in 2026?

Markets.com and Equiti both offer multi-asset trading, but they cater to different priorities. Markets.com takes the overall win with stronger regulation and a lower entry barrier, while Equiti fights back with tighter spreads for cost-conscious traders.

OVERALL WINNER
M

Markets.com

3.8 / 5Score: 3 / 4

A tri-regulated, 18-year-old broker that makes low-cost entry and strong oversight accessible from just $100.

Min deposit
$100
Max leverage
1:300
Spread from
0.6 pips
Regulators
CySEC, ASIC, FCA
E

Equiti

3.2 / 5Score: 1 / 4

Tight 0.5 pip spreads and leverage up to 1:500 for traders who prioritize raw cost efficiency.

Min deposit
$500
Max leverage
1:500
Spread from
0.5 pips
Regulators
FCA, FSRA
Overall Winner
Markets.com
Best for Beginners
Markets.com
Lowest Fees
Equiti
Top Regulation
Markets.com

Side-by-side comparison

Core features compared head-to-head.

Feature
M
Markets.com
E
Equiti
Overview
Rating3.8 / 53.2 / 5
Founded20082014
HeadquartersLimassol, CyprusAmman, Jordan
RegulationCySEC, ASIC, FCAFCA, FSRA
Fees & Limits
Min Deposit$100$500
Spreads From0.6 pips0.5 pips
CommissionNoneNone
Max Leverage1:3001:500
Platforms & Markets
Trading PlatformsMT4, MT5, Proprietary WebMT4, MT5
Markets OfferedForex, Cfd, Stocks, Indices, Commodities, CryptoForex, Cfd, Stocks, Indices, Commodities, Crypto

Trading & non-trading fees

Min Deposit

Markets.com

$100

Equiti

$500

Spreads From

Markets.com

0.6 pips

Equiti

0.5 pips

Commission

Markets.com

None

Equiti

None

Deposit Fees

Markets.com

None

Equiti

None

Withdrawal Fees

Markets.com

None

Equiti

None

Pros & cons

M

Markets.com

Pros

  • Holds three reputable regulatory licences for stronger fund safety
  • Accessible to new traders with a modest $100 entry point
  • Offers a proprietary web platform alongside standard MetaTrader options
  • 18 years of operating history signals long-term stability
  • No commission, deposit, or withdrawal fees on trading accounts
  • Higher overall rating of 3.8/5 in our independent assessment

Cons

  • Spreads start slightly higher at 0.6 pips versus competitors
  • Maximum leverage capped at 1:300, lower than some rivals
  • Headquartered in Cyprus, which may feel less localized for Middle East-based traders
E

Equiti

Pros

  • Tighter spreads from 0.5 pips reduce per-trade trading costs
  • Higher maximum leverage of 1:500 for flexible position sizing
  • No commission, deposit, or withdrawal fees
  • Regulated by both FCA and FSRA for solid oversight
  • Reliable access to the trusted MT4 and MT5 trading ecosystem

Cons

  • Higher $500 minimum deposit creates a bigger barrier to entry
  • Only two regulatory licences versus competitors with three
  • No proprietary platform option beyond standard MetaTrader
  • Shorter operating history, founded in 2014 versus older competitors
  • Lower overall rating of 3.2/5 in our independent assessment

Our expert verdict

Editor's verdict

Overall winner Markets.com
Lowest fees Equiti
Best regulation Markets.com
Better for beginners Markets.com

Markets.com is our recommended pick overall, earning an 3.8/5 rating compared to Equiti's 3.2/5 on our proprietary scoring system. Markets.com's tri-regulated status (CySEC, ASIC, FCA), lower $100 minimum deposit, and longer 18-year track record make it the stronger all-around platform for most traders. Equiti counters with a genuine edge in raw pricing, offering spreads from 0.5 pips versus Markets.com's 0.6 pips, plus higher leverage ceilings up to 1:500. If razor-thin spreads and maximum leverage are your top priority and you can meet a $500 minimum deposit, Equiti remains a credible alternative — but for the majority of traders seeking safety, accessibility, and platform variety, Markets.com delivers the stronger complete package.

Regulation & Safety

Regulatory strength is one of the clearest differentiators in this matchup. Markets.com is licensed across three tier-1 and tier-2 jurisdictions — CySEC, ASIC, and the FCA — giving traders a broader safety net including access to UK and Australian investor protection schemes alongside European MiFID rules.

Equiti, by comparison, is regulated by the FCA and FSRA (Abu Dhabi Global Market), which is still a respectable combination but offers one fewer layer of oversight than its competitor. Both regulators are reputable, but Markets.com's additional ASIC licence gives it a wider geographic safety footprint.

For traders who prioritize fund security and multi-jurisdictional compliance above all else, Markets.com's three-licence structure provides extra peace of mind. Equiti's two-regulator setup is still solid, particularly for traders operating in the Middle East or UK, where FSRA and FCA oversight is directly relevant.

Fees, Spreads & Trading Costs

This is the one category where Equiti pulls ahead. Equiti advertises spreads from 0.5 pips, edging out Markets.com's starting spread of 0.6 pips — a modest but measurable advantage for high-frequency or scalping traders where every fraction of a pip compounds over volume.

Neither broker charges trading commissions, and both waive deposit and withdrawal fees entirely, which keeps the overall cost comparison relatively close despite the spread difference.

Equiti also offers higher maximum leverage at 1:500 compared to Markets.com's 1:300 cap, which can amplify both potential returns and risk for traders using higher-leverage strategies. However, the cost savings from tighter spreads only matter if a trader's volume is high enough to make the pip-by-pip difference meaningful.

Account Accessibility & Minimum Deposit

Markets.com is substantially more accessible to new or smaller-capital traders, requiring just a $100 minimum deposit to open an account. This is a fraction of Equiti's $500 minimum deposit requirement.

For beginners testing strategies or traders who prefer to scale up capital gradually, Markets.com's lower barrier to entry removes a significant upfront commitment. Equiti's higher threshold may suit traders who are already confident in their capital allocation and trading plan from day one.

This accessibility gap is a major reason Markets.com scores higher for beginner-friendliness in our evaluation, as it allows traders to test the platform and strategies with considerably less capital at risk upfront.

Trading Platforms & Technology

Markets.com supports MT4, MT5, and its own Proprietary Web platform, giving traders a broader choice of trading environments. This extra proprietary option can appeal to traders who want a modern, integrated web experience beyond the standard MetaTrader suite.

Equiti supports only MT4 and MT5, which remains a dependable and widely trusted combination for most forex and CFD traders, but lacks the additional proprietary alternative that Markets.com provides.

Both brokers give traders access to the industry-standard MetaTrader ecosystem, meaning automated trading, custom indicators, and expert advisors work seamlessly on either platform. The extra Proprietary Web option gives Markets.com a slight edge in platform variety and flexibility.

Markets & Instrument Range

Both brokers offer an identical breadth of tradable markets, covering Forex, CFDs, Stocks, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto. This parity means instrument variety is not a deciding factor between the two platforms.

Traders looking to diversify across asset classes will find equivalent opportunities at either broker, so the decision ultimately comes down to cost structure, regulation, and platform preference rather than market access.

Company Background & Track Record

Markets.com was founded in 2008 and is headquartered in Limassol, Cyprus, giving it a notably longer operating history of 18 years. Longevity in the brokerage industry often correlates with operational stability and a proven ability to navigate changing regulatory environments.

Equiti was founded in 2014 and is based in Amman, Jordan. While younger, Equiti has still built a presence across FCA and FSRA-regulated markets, establishing itself as a credible player despite the shorter track record.

Both companies maintain a genuine multi-asset offering and transparent fee structures, but Markets.com's extended history gives it a slight trust advantage for traders who weigh longevity heavily in their broker selection.

Verdict summary

The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.

Editor's verdict

Markets.com wins overall

Markets.com edges out Equiti overall based on our expert rating score.

M

Highest Rated

Markets.com

3.8 / 5 / 5

Visit Markets.com

Category winners

  • Overall winner

    Based on overall expert rating (3.8/5).

    Markets.com
  • Better for beginners

    Stronger onboarding and educational resources.

    Markets.com
  • Lower trading costs

    More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.

    Equiti
  • Stronger regulation

    Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.

    Markets.com

Frequently asked questions

Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

BP AI