Phillip Capital
Nearly 50 years of regulated stability with zero minimum deposit to get started.
- Min deposit
- $0
- Max leverage
- 1:5
- Spread from
- 0 pips
- Regulators
- MAS, ASIC
Phillip Capital and ACY Securities both serve active traders, but they differ sharply on regulation, cost structure, and platform choice. Our independent research puts Phillip Capital ahead overall, though ACY Securities still holds appeal for leverage-hungry MT4/MT5 traders.
Nearly 50 years of regulated stability with zero minimum deposit to get started.
High-leverage MetaTrader trading built for traders who want familiar tools and bigger exposure.
Core features compared head-to-head.
| Feature | PC Phillip Capital | AS ACY Securities |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.7 / 5 | 3.2 / 5 |
| Founded | 1975 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Singapore | Sydney, Australia |
| Regulation | MAS, ASIC | ASIC |
| Fees & Limits | ||
| Min Deposit | $0 | $50 |
| Spreads From | 0 pips | 0 pips |
| Commission | $0.08/lot | $3/lot |
| Max Leverage | 1:5 | 1:500 |
| Platforms & Markets | ||
| Trading Platforms | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile | MT4, MT5 |
| Markets Offered | Stocks, Forex, Cfd, Indices, Commodities | Forex, Cfd, Indices, Commodities, Crypto |
Phillip Capital
$0
ACY Securities
$50
Phillip Capital
0 pips
ACY Securities
0 pips
Phillip Capital
$0.08/lot
ACY Securities
$3/lot
Phillip Capital
None
ACY Securities
None
Phillip Capital
None
ACY Securities
None
Phillip Capital is our top pick in this matchup, earning an overall rating of 3.7/5 compared to ACY Securities's 3.2/5. The deciding factors are Phillip Capital's dual tier-1 regulatory licences (MAS and ASIC), its $0 minimum deposit, and nearly five decades of market presence since 1975. ACY Securities remains competitive for traders who specifically want MT4/MT5 access or higher leverage up to 1:500, but for most traders — especially beginners prioritizing safety and low entry barriers — Phillip Capital offers the stronger all-round package.
Regulatory strength is one of the clearest differentiators in this comparison. Phillip Capital is licensed by two respected tier-1 regulators — the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) and Australia's ASIC — giving traders dual-jurisdiction oversight and added confidence in fund segregation practices.
ACY Securities, by contrast, holds only a single ASIC licence. While ASIC is a credible and well-regarded regulator in its own right, having just one licence compared to Phillip Capital's two means less layered protection for client capital.
For traders who prioritize regulatory depth above all else, Phillip Capital's multi-jurisdictional coverage gives it a clear structural advantage in this category.
Both brokers advertise spreads starting from 0 pips, making the headline spread comparison a wash on paper. However, the real cost story emerges in the commission structure.
Phillip Capital charges a notably lean $0.08 per lot in commission, while ACY Securities charges $3 per lot. For high-frequency or volume-based traders, that difference compounds significantly over time and materially affects net trading costs.
Neither broker charges deposit or withdrawal fees, which is a welcome similarity. But when you combine spread parity with Phillip Capital's far lower commission rate, Phillip Capital comes out ahead on total cost of trading.
Phillip Capital requires no minimum deposit at all, making it exceptionally accessible to beginners, students, or anyone wanting to test the platform without committing capital upfront.
ACY Securities requires a $50 minimum deposit. While this is still a relatively low barrier by industry standards, it's a meaningful gap when stacked against Phillip Capital's $0 requirement.
This accessibility difference is one of the key reasons Phillip Capital earns our 'Best for Beginners' distinction in this matchup.
Platform choice may be the single biggest reason a trader picks one of these brokers over the other. Phillip Capital relies on its own proprietary web and mobile platforms, while ACY Securities supports the industry-standard MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 suite.
Traders who already have MT4/MT5 expertise, custom indicators, or automated expert advisors will likely gravitate toward ACY Securities, since proprietary platforms generally don't support third-party EAs or MQL scripting.
On market range, Phillip Capital covers stocks, forex, CFDs, indices, and commodities, while ACY Securities swaps out direct stock access for cryptocurrency CFDs. Traders wanting equities exposure lean toward Phillip Capital; crypto-curious traders may prefer ACY Securities.
ACY Securities offers substantially higher maximum leverage at 1:500, compared to Phillip Capital's far more conservative 1:5 cap. This makes ACY Securities the clear choice for experienced traders seeking to amplify position sizes with smaller capital outlays.
However, higher leverage also means higher risk of amplified losses, and Phillip Capital's lower leverage ceiling reflects its more conservative, regulation-first approach, especially under MAS oversight.
Risk-tolerant traders comfortable managing leveraged exposure may see ACY Securities's flexibility as a genuine pro, while risk-averse or newer traders may appreciate Phillip Capital's built-in guardrails.
Phillip Capital has been operating since 1975, giving it over 50 years of market history and institutional credibility headquartered in Singapore.
ACY Securities is a comparatively newer entrant, founded in 2011 and based in Sydney, Australia. While 15 years is still a respectable operating history, it doesn't match Phillip Capital's long-standing legacy.
Longevity isn't everything, but in financial services it often correlates with operational resilience and crisis-tested stability, another point in Phillip Capital's favor.
The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.
Phillip Capital edges out ACY Securities overall based on our expert rating score.
Highest Rated
Phillip Capital
3.7 / 5 / 5
Category winners
Overall winner
Based on overall expert rating (3.7/5).
Better for beginners
Stronger onboarding and educational resources.
Lower trading costs
More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.
Stronger regulation
Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.
Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.