Phillip Nova
Commission-free multi-asset trading with MAS-regulated security and higher leverage flexibility.
- Min deposit
- $0
- Max leverage
- 1:20
- Spread from
- 0.6 pips
- Regulators
- MAS
Phillip Nova and RHB Securities are two established Asia-Pacific brokers appealing to very different trader profiles. Our independent research gives Phillip Nova a slight edge overall (3.4/5 vs 3.3/5), but RHB Securities fights back hard on raw pricing and regulatory breadth.
Commission-free multi-asset trading with MAS-regulated security and higher leverage flexibility.
A veteran Malaysian securities house offering tight 0-pip spreads and dual-jurisdiction regulatory trust.
Same category, top-tier regulation, and it's currently accepting new traders.
See What Makes It DifferentCore features compared head-to-head.
| Feature | PN Phillip Nova | RS RHB Securities |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.4 / 5 | 3.3 / 5 |
| Founded | 2005 | 1994 |
| Headquarters | Singapore | Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia |
| Regulation | MAS | SC Malaysia, MAS |
| Fees & Limits | ||
| Min Deposit | $0 | $0 |
| Spreads From | 0.6 pips | 0 pips |
| Commission | None | $0.1/lot |
| Max Leverage | 1:20 | 1:2 |
| Platforms & Markets | ||
| Trading Platforms | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile, POEMS | RHB TradeSmart, RHB Mobile |
| Markets Offered | Forex, Cfd, Indices, Commodities, Crypto | Stocks, Etf, Bonds, Funds |
Phillip Nova
$0
RHB Securities
$0
Phillip Nova
0.6 pips
RHB Securities
0 pips
Phillip Nova
None
RHB Securities
$0.1/lot
Phillip Nova
None
RHB Securities
None
Phillip Nova
None
RHB Securities
None
Phillip Nova is our pick for most traders, thanks to a stronger overall rating, commission-free forex and CFD trading, higher leverage, and broader market access spanning crypto, indices, and commodities. That said, RHB Securities is the sharper choice for cost-conscious stock and ETF investors who want 0-pip spreads and multi-jurisdiction regulatory coverage across Malaysia and Singapore.
Phillip Nova edges out RHB Securities in our independent rating system, scoring 3.4/5 compared to RHB Securities's 3.3/5. The gap is narrow, but it reflects Phillip Nova's broader product suite and more trader-friendly cost structure for leveraged products.
RHB Securities, by contrast, scored 1/3 on our core criteria benchmark versus Phillip Nova's 2/3, largely due to its narrower focus on traditional securities rather than multi-asset derivatives trading.
These scores shouldn't be read in isolation, though. RHB Securities' lower headline score doesn't mean it's a weak broker — it simply serves a different type of investor, one focused on long-term equity and fund holdings rather than active CFD or forex trading.
This is where RHB Securities claws back ground. It advertises spreads from 0 pips, undercutting Phillip Nova's 0.6 pip starting spread. However, RHB Securities charges a $0.1/lot commission on top, whereas Phillip Nova charges no per-trade commission at all.
For high-frequency forex or CFD traders, Phillip Nova's commission-free model combined with modest spreads often works out cheaper in practice, especially on smaller trade sizes. For stock and ETF investors trading in larger lot sizes, RHB Securities' tight spreads can be more competitive.
Neither broker charges deposit or withdrawal fees, which is a welcome point of parity. Both also offer a $0 minimum deposit, removing barriers to entry for new account holders on either platform.
Both brokers operate under tier-1 oversight, giving traders a comparable baseline of safety and fund protection. Phillip Nova is regulated solely by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), a highly respected single-jurisdiction regulator.
RHB Securities holds licences from both SC Malaysia and MAS, giving it a wider regulatory footprint across two jurisdictions. This dual coverage earns RHB Securities our award for Best for Regulation, since broader oversight can appeal to traders who value cross-border compliance assurance.
Neither broker carries any major red flags in our research, and both are backed by long operating histories. Traders prioritising multi-jurisdiction licencing should lean toward RHB Securities, while those comfortable with single-regulator MAS oversight will find Phillip Nova equally trustworthy.
Phillip Nova offers its own Proprietary Web and Proprietary Mobile platforms, alongside the well-known POEMS suite, giving traders flexibility between desktop, browser, and app-based access. POEMS in particular has a long track record among Singapore-based investors.
RHB Securities runs on RHB TradeSmart and RHB Mobile, platforms built primarily around equities, ETFs, bonds, and fund execution rather than fast-paced derivatives trading.
Neither broker supports third-party platforms like MetaTrader 4 or 5, which may disappoint traders who prefer industry-standard charting and automated strategy tools. Both rely on proprietary technology, so the overall experience comes down to personal preference and asset focus.
Phillip Nova offers considerably broader market access, covering Forex, CFDs, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto — five asset classes in total. Its maximum leverage of 1:20 also gives active traders more flexibility to size positions.
RHB Securities focuses on Stocks, ETFs, Bonds, and Funds, making it a more traditional investment-oriented brokerage. Its maximum leverage caps out at a conservative 1:2, reflecting its orientation toward longer-term capital markets investing rather than short-term speculation.
The choice here is largely determined by trading style: active multi-asset traders and speculators will gravitate toward Phillip Nova, while buy-and-hold investors building a diversified securities portfolio will find RHB Securities better aligned with their goals.
Phillip Nova takes the overall win thanks to its stronger rating, commission-free pricing, higher leverage ceiling, and far broader market coverage spanning forex, crypto, and commodities alongside CFDs.
RHB Securities remains a highly credible alternative, particularly for investors focused on stocks, ETFs, bonds, and funds who value tighter headline spreads and dual-jurisdiction regulatory coverage across Malaysia and Singapore.
Ultimately, these two brokers rarely compete head-to-head for the exact same client — your choice should hinge on whether you're an active multi-asset trader (Phillip Nova) or a traditional securities investor (RHB Securities).
The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.
Phillip Nova edges out RHB Securities overall based on our expert rating score.
Highest Rated
Phillip Nova
3.4 / 5 / 5
Category winners
Overall winner
Based on overall expert rating (3.4/5).
Better for beginners
Stronger onboarding and educational resources.
Lower trading costs
More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.
Stronger regulation
Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.
Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Our #1 Pick Right Now: AvaTrade
Same category, top-tier regulation, and it's currently accepting new traders.