Rakuten Securities
Zero minimum deposit and zero-pip spreads from a Japanese financial institution with 25+ years of history.
- Min deposit
- $0
- Max leverage
- 1:3
- Spread from
- 0 pips
- Regulators
- FSA
Rakuten Securities and BDSwiss sit on opposite ends of the broker spectrum — one a Tokyo-based giant with zero-pip spreads, the other a Cyprus-regulated CFD specialist offering massive leverage. Our research gives Rakuten Securities the edge overall, but BDSwiss still has a clear niche.
Zero minimum deposit and zero-pip spreads from a Japanese financial institution with 25+ years of history.
Multi-jurisdictional regulation paired with leverage up to 1:2000 for traders who want flexibility and reach.
Core features compared head-to-head.
| Feature | RS Rakuten Securities | B BDSwiss |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.4 / 5 | 3.2 / 5 |
| Founded | 1999 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Tokyo, Japan | Limassol, Cyprus |
| Regulation | FSA | FSA, CySEC |
| Fees & Limits | ||
| Min Deposit | $0 | $10 |
| Spreads From | 0 pips | 1.5 pips |
| Commission | None | None |
| Max Leverage | 1:3 | 1:2000 |
| Platforms & Markets | ||
| Trading Platforms | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile, MarketSpeed II | MT4, MT5, Proprietary Web |
| Markets Offered | Stocks, Etf, Crypto, Forex, Indices | Forex, Cfd, Indices, Commodities, Stocks, Crypto |
Rakuten Securities
$0
BDSwiss
$10
Rakuten Securities
0 pips
BDSwiss
1.5 pips
Rakuten Securities
None
BDSwiss
None
Rakuten Securities
None
BDSwiss
None
Rakuten Securities
None
BDSwiss
None
Rakuten Securities takes the win in this matchup, earning a 3.4/5 on our rating system versus BDSwiss's 3.2/5. The deciding factors are cost and accessibility: Rakuten Securities charges no minimum deposit and advertises spreads from 0 pips, compared to BDSwiss's $10 minimum and 1.5 pip starting spreads. BDSwiss claws back ground with broader regulatory coverage and far higher leverage ceilings, making it the more compelling option for aggressive CFD traders who prioritize jurisdictional diversity over raw cost savings.
Rakuten Securities operates under a single but heavyweight regulator: Japan's Financial Services Agency (FSA). As a listed entity with roots dating back to 1999, Rakuten Securities benefits from the strict oversight and investor protection standards that Japanese financial regulation demands, even though it holds only one license.
BDSwiss, by contrast, spreads its regulatory footprint across two jurisdictions — the FSA and CySEC — giving it technical breadth that Rakuten Securities doesn't match. This multi-license structure can appeal to traders who want the flexibility of operating under different regional entities.
That said, regulatory quantity isn't the full picture. Rakuten Securities' single-license approach is backed by over two decades of operating history and a presence as a listed Japanese financial institution, while BDSwiss, founded in 2012, is comparatively newer. Both brokers list no deposit or withdrawal fees, which is a reassuring baseline for cost transparency on either side.
For traders who weight jurisdictional diversity heavily, BDSwiss earns our 'Best for Regulation' award in this comparison. But those prioritizing the credibility of an established, long-standing institution may still lean toward Rakuten Securities.
This is where the comparison tilts decisively toward Rakuten Securities. Spreads start from 0 pips, compared to BDSwiss's 1.5 pips minimum — a meaningful difference for active traders who transact frequently and feel the cumulative cost of wider spreads.
Neither broker charges a commission on top of spreads, and both waive deposit and withdrawal fees entirely, so the primary cost differentiator comes down to spread width rather than hidden transaction charges.
Minimum deposit requirements reinforce Rakuten Securities' cost advantage. There's no minimum deposit at all to open an account, whereas BDSwiss requires a modest $10 to get started. While $10 is hardly a barrier for most traders, the $0 threshold at Rakuten Securities makes it marginally more accessible for beginners testing the waters.
Overall, for cost-conscious traders — especially those running higher-frequency strategies — the tighter spreads at Rakuten Securities translate into real savings over time, which is why it earns our 'Best for Low Fees' award.
BDSwiss offers substantially higher maximum leverage at 1:2000, dwarfing Rakuten Securities' comparatively conservative 1:3 cap. This gap reflects the differing regulatory philosophies behind each broker — Japanese FSA rules impose strict leverage caps to protect retail traders, while BDSwiss's CySEC and offshore structuring allows for far more aggressive leverage tiers.
High leverage can amplify both profits and losses, so this isn't automatically a point in BDSwiss's favor for every trader. Conservative or risk-averse traders may actually prefer the built-in guardrails that come with Rakuten Securities' lower leverage ceiling.
Experienced traders running leveraged forex or CFD strategies, however, will find BDSwiss's 1:2000 ceiling far more flexible for capital-efficient position sizing.
Rakuten Securities runs its own proprietary ecosystem, including a Proprietary Web platform, a Proprietary Mobile app, and the dedicated MarketSpeed II terminal — tools built specifically around its Japanese retail client base and optimized for stocks, ETFs, crypto, forex, and indices trading.
BDSwiss instead leans on the industry-standard MetaTrader 4 and MetaTrader 5 platforms, alongside its own Proprietary Web interface. This gives BDSwiss users access to the vast ecosystem of MT4/MT5 indicators, expert advisors, and automated trading tools that many global traders already know well.
On market breadth, BDSwiss edges ahead with six asset classes — forex, CFDs, indices, commodities, stocks, and crypto — versus Rakuten Securities' five (stocks, ETFs, crypto, forex, and indices). Traders wanting commodities or pure CFD exposure will find BDSwiss's offering more complete.
Ultimately, platform choice comes down to preference: traders who value the familiarity and third-party tool support of MT4/MT5 will gravitate to BDSwiss, while those comfortable in a proprietary, Japan-centric environment will find Rakuten Securities' suite perfectly adequate.
New traders typically weigh three things first: cost of entry, simplicity, and overall trust. Rakuten Securities wins decisively on the first metric with its $0 minimum deposit, removing any financial barrier to opening an account.
Combined with tighter spreads and a long operating history since 1999, Rakuten Securities presents a lower-risk, lower-cost entry point for beginners, which is why it takes our 'Best for Beginners' award.
BDSwiss's $10 minimum is still low by industry standards, but its higher spreads and dramatically higher available leverage mean newer traders need to exercise more caution to avoid overextending themselves on risk.
Weighing all factors, Rakuten Securities earns the higher overall rating at 3.4/5 compared to BDSwiss's 3.2/5. Its combination of zero minimum deposit, tighter spreads, and long institutional track record makes it the stronger all-around choice for most traders.
BDSwiss remains a valid pick for a specific type of trader — one who values multi-jurisdictional regulation, higher leverage ceilings, and a broader spread of tradable asset classes including commodities and CFDs. For everyone else, Rakuten Securities offers the stronger overall package.
The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.
Rakuten Securities edges out BDSwiss overall based on our expert rating score.
Highest Rated
Rakuten Securities
3.4 / 5 / 5
Category winners
Overall winner
Based on overall expert rating (3.4/5).
Better for beginners
Stronger onboarding and educational resources.
Lower trading costs
More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.
Stronger regulation
Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.
Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.