Brokers Profile
Reviewed by Experts Updated 10/20/2026

Stake vs M1 Finance: Which Stock Broker Wins in 2026?

Stake and M1 Finance both offer commission-free stock trading, but they differ sharply on regulation, deposit requirements, and overall value. Our research gives Stake the edge with a 3.4/5 rating against M1 Finance's 3.2/5. Here's the full breakdown for 2026.

OVERALL WINNER
S

Stake

3.4 / 5Score: 3 / 3

Zero minimum deposit and dual tier-1 regulation make Stake the most accessible entry point into stock investing.

Min deposit
$0
Max leverage
1:1
Spread from
0 pips
Regulators
ASIC, FCA
MF

M1 Finance

3.2 / 5Score: 0 / 3

A longer track record and broader market access give M1 Finance an edge for diversified, US-based investors.

Min deposit
$100
Max leverage
1:2
Spread from
0 pips
Regulators
SEC

Our #1 Pick Right Now: AvaTrade

Same category, top-tier regulation, and it's currently accepting new traders.

See What Makes It Different
Overall Winner
Stake
Best for Beginners
Stake
Lowest Fees
Stake
Top Regulation
Stake

Side-by-side comparison

Core features compared head-to-head.

Feature
S
Stake
MF
M1 Finance
Overview
Rating3.4 / 53.2 / 5
Founded20172015
HeadquartersSydney, AustraliaChicago, USA
RegulationASIC, FCASEC
Fees & Limits
Min Deposit$0$100
Spreads From0 pips0 pips
CommissionNoneNone
Max Leverage1:11:2
Platforms & Markets
Trading PlatformsProprietary Web, Proprietary MobileProprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile
Markets OfferedStocksStocks, Indices

Trading & non-trading fees

Min Deposit

Stake

$0

M1 Finance

$100

Spreads From

Stake

0 pips

M1 Finance

0 pips

Commission

Stake

None

M1 Finance

None

Deposit Fees

Stake

None

M1 Finance

None

Withdrawal Fees

Stake

None

M1 Finance

None

Pros & cons

S

Stake

Pros

  • Holds a higher overall rating of 3.4/5 in our research
  • No minimum deposit required to open an account
  • Regulated by two tier-1 authorities (ASIC and FCA)
  • Completely free deposits and withdrawals
  • Commission-free stock trading
  • Clean, beginner-friendly proprietary platforms
  • Strong regulatory protection for international clients

Cons

  • Limited to stocks only, with no index market access
  • Maximum leverage capped at 1:1
  • No support for MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, or cTrader
  • Shorter operating history compared to M1 Finance
  • Not ideal for traders seeking leveraged exposure
MF

M1 Finance

Pros

  • Broader market access including stocks and indices
  • Higher available leverage at up to 1:2
  • More established company, founded in 2015
  • Commission-free trading structure
  • No deposit or withdrawal fees
  • Straightforward proprietary platform experience

Cons

  • Lower overall rating of 3.2/5 in our research
  • Only regulated by a single authority (SEC)
  • Requires a $100 minimum deposit versus Stake's $0
  • No support for MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, or cTrader
  • Scored 0/3 on our regulatory strength criteria

Our expert verdict

Editor's verdict

Overall winner Stake
Lowest fees Stake
Best regulation Stake
Better for beginners Stake

Stake is our recommended pick in this comparison, scoring 3.4/5 versus M1 Finance's 3.2/5 on our independent rating system. Stake holds more tier-1 regulatory licences (ASIC, FCA), offers a $0 minimum deposit, and delivers a stronger overall package for most traders. M1 Finance remains a credible alternative for US-based investors who want slightly higher leverage and a broader market selection including indices, but it trails Stake in accessibility and regulatory depth.

Regulation & Safety

Regulation is one of the clearest differentiators in this matchup. Stake is regulated by two tier-1 authorities — ASIC in Australia and the FCA in the United Kingdom — giving it a broader international compliance footprint and multiple layers of oversight for client fund protection.

M1 Finance, by contrast, operates under SEC oversight in the United States. While the SEC is a respected regulator for US investors, having only a single licence means M1 Finance offers less diversified regulatory coverage compared to Stake's dual tier-1 licensing.

For traders who prioritize regulatory redundancy and operate across multiple jurisdictions, Stake's ASIC and FCA licences provide greater peace of mind. This is reflected directly in our scoring, where Stake earned a perfect 3/3 on regulatory criteria against M1 Finance's 0/3.

Fees, Spreads & Account Costs

Both brokers advertise commission-free trading and spreads starting from 0 pips, putting them on equal footing at the headline level. Neither platform charges deposit or withdrawal fees, which is a welcome feature for cost-conscious investors on both sides.

The real differentiator emerges at account entry. Stake requires no minimum deposit at all, meaning new traders can open and fund an account with any amount they're comfortable with. M1 Finance requires a $100 minimum deposit, which is still modest by industry standards but creates a higher barrier for beginners or those wanting to test the platform with minimal capital.

When total cost of ownership is considered — spreads, commissions, deposit/withdrawal fees, and entry capital — Stake comes out marginally ahead thanks to its zero minimum deposit policy.

Trading Platforms & Tools

Both brokers rely on proprietary technology rather than third-party platforms like MetaTrader. Stake offers its own Proprietary Web and Proprietary Mobile applications, as does M1 Finance, meaning platform choice alone won't be a deciding factor for most users.

The experience will largely come down to personal preference in interface design and workflow, since both companies have invested in building in-house trading ecosystems rather than licensing external software.

Neither broker currently supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, or cTrader, which may be a consideration for algorithmic traders or those who rely on custom indicators and expert advisors built for those ecosystems.

Market Access & Leverage

M1 Finance edges ahead slightly on market breadth, offering access to both Stocks and Indices, while Stake focuses solely on Stocks. Traders wanting index exposure alongside individual equities may find M1 Finance's offering more rounded.

Leverage also favors M1 Finance, which offers up to 1:2 compared to Stake's 1:1. Neither leverage ratio is aggressive by forex or CFD industry standards, which suggests both platforms are oriented toward longer-term investors rather than short-term leveraged speculators.

Traders whose strategy depends heavily on diversified index exposure or modest leverage amplification may lean toward M1 Finance despite its lower overall rating.

Company Background & Track Record

M1 Finance has a slightly longer operating history, founded in 2015 and headquartered in Chicago, USA. Stake was founded two years later in 2017 and is headquartered in Sydney, Australia.

Both companies have had time to establish their platforms and build a client base, though M1 Finance's three-year head start may appeal to investors who place extra weight on longevity and track record.

That said, track record alone doesn't outweigh the regulatory and accessibility advantages Stake brings to the table, which is why Stake still finishes ahead in our overall scoring despite being the newer company.

Our Verdict

Weighing all criteria together — regulation, fees, accessibility, platforms, and market range — Stake earns the stronger overall rating at 3.4/5 compared to M1 Finance's 3.2/5. Its dual tier-1 licensing and zero minimum deposit make it the more accessible and better-protected choice for most traders.

M1 Finance isn't a poor choice by any means; it remains competitive for US-based investors specifically seeking index exposure or slightly higher leverage. But for the majority of traders, particularly beginners and those prioritizing regulatory strength, Stake offers the more compelling package in 2026.

Verdict summary

The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.

Editor's verdict

Stake wins overall

Stake edges out M1 Finance overall based on our expert rating score.

S

Highest Rated

Stake

3.4 / 5 / 5

Category winners

  • Overall winner

    Based on overall expert rating (3.4/5).

    Stake
  • Better for beginners

    Stronger onboarding and educational resources.

    Stake
  • Lower trading costs

    More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.

    Stake
  • Stronger regulation

    Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.

    Stake

Frequently asked questions

Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

Our #1 Pick Right Now: AvaTrade

Same category, top-tier regulation, and it's currently accepting new traders.

See What Makes It Different
BP AI