Stake
Zero minimum deposit and dual tier-1 regulation make Stake the most accessible entry point into stock investing.
- Min deposit
- $0
- Max leverage
- 1:1
- Spread from
- 0 pips
- Regulators
- ASIC, FCA
Stake and M1 Finance both offer commission-free stock trading, but they differ sharply on regulation, deposit requirements, and overall value. Our research gives Stake the edge with a 3.4/5 rating against M1 Finance's 3.2/5. Here's the full breakdown for 2026.
Zero minimum deposit and dual tier-1 regulation make Stake the most accessible entry point into stock investing.
A longer track record and broader market access give M1 Finance an edge for diversified, US-based investors.
Same category, top-tier regulation, and it's currently accepting new traders.
See What Makes It DifferentCore features compared head-to-head.
| Feature | S Stake | MF M1 Finance |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.4 / 5 | 3.2 / 5 |
| Founded | 2017 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Sydney, Australia | Chicago, USA |
| Regulation | ASIC, FCA | SEC |
| Fees & Limits | ||
| Min Deposit | $0 | $100 |
| Spreads From | 0 pips | 0 pips |
| Commission | None | None |
| Max Leverage | 1:1 | 1:2 |
| Platforms & Markets | ||
| Trading Platforms | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile |
| Markets Offered | Stocks | Stocks, Indices |
Stake
$0
M1 Finance
$100
Stake
0 pips
M1 Finance
0 pips
Stake
None
M1 Finance
None
Stake
None
M1 Finance
None
Stake
None
M1 Finance
None
Stake is our recommended pick in this comparison, scoring 3.4/5 versus M1 Finance's 3.2/5 on our independent rating system. Stake holds more tier-1 regulatory licences (ASIC, FCA), offers a $0 minimum deposit, and delivers a stronger overall package for most traders. M1 Finance remains a credible alternative for US-based investors who want slightly higher leverage and a broader market selection including indices, but it trails Stake in accessibility and regulatory depth.
Regulation is one of the clearest differentiators in this matchup. Stake is regulated by two tier-1 authorities — ASIC in Australia and the FCA in the United Kingdom — giving it a broader international compliance footprint and multiple layers of oversight for client fund protection.
M1 Finance, by contrast, operates under SEC oversight in the United States. While the SEC is a respected regulator for US investors, having only a single licence means M1 Finance offers less diversified regulatory coverage compared to Stake's dual tier-1 licensing.
For traders who prioritize regulatory redundancy and operate across multiple jurisdictions, Stake's ASIC and FCA licences provide greater peace of mind. This is reflected directly in our scoring, where Stake earned a perfect 3/3 on regulatory criteria against M1 Finance's 0/3.
Both brokers advertise commission-free trading and spreads starting from 0 pips, putting them on equal footing at the headline level. Neither platform charges deposit or withdrawal fees, which is a welcome feature for cost-conscious investors on both sides.
The real differentiator emerges at account entry. Stake requires no minimum deposit at all, meaning new traders can open and fund an account with any amount they're comfortable with. M1 Finance requires a $100 minimum deposit, which is still modest by industry standards but creates a higher barrier for beginners or those wanting to test the platform with minimal capital.
When total cost of ownership is considered — spreads, commissions, deposit/withdrawal fees, and entry capital — Stake comes out marginally ahead thanks to its zero minimum deposit policy.
Both brokers rely on proprietary technology rather than third-party platforms like MetaTrader. Stake offers its own Proprietary Web and Proprietary Mobile applications, as does M1 Finance, meaning platform choice alone won't be a deciding factor for most users.
The experience will largely come down to personal preference in interface design and workflow, since both companies have invested in building in-house trading ecosystems rather than licensing external software.
Neither broker currently supports MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, or cTrader, which may be a consideration for algorithmic traders or those who rely on custom indicators and expert advisors built for those ecosystems.
M1 Finance edges ahead slightly on market breadth, offering access to both Stocks and Indices, while Stake focuses solely on Stocks. Traders wanting index exposure alongside individual equities may find M1 Finance's offering more rounded.
Leverage also favors M1 Finance, which offers up to 1:2 compared to Stake's 1:1. Neither leverage ratio is aggressive by forex or CFD industry standards, which suggests both platforms are oriented toward longer-term investors rather than short-term leveraged speculators.
Traders whose strategy depends heavily on diversified index exposure or modest leverage amplification may lean toward M1 Finance despite its lower overall rating.
M1 Finance has a slightly longer operating history, founded in 2015 and headquartered in Chicago, USA. Stake was founded two years later in 2017 and is headquartered in Sydney, Australia.
Both companies have had time to establish their platforms and build a client base, though M1 Finance's three-year head start may appeal to investors who place extra weight on longevity and track record.
That said, track record alone doesn't outweigh the regulatory and accessibility advantages Stake brings to the table, which is why Stake still finishes ahead in our overall scoring despite being the newer company.
Weighing all criteria together — regulation, fees, accessibility, platforms, and market range — Stake earns the stronger overall rating at 3.4/5 compared to M1 Finance's 3.2/5. Its dual tier-1 licensing and zero minimum deposit make it the more accessible and better-protected choice for most traders.
M1 Finance isn't a poor choice by any means; it remains competitive for US-based investors specifically seeking index exposure or slightly higher leverage. But for the majority of traders, particularly beginners and those prioritizing regulatory strength, Stake offers the more compelling package in 2026.
The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.
Stake edges out M1 Finance overall based on our expert rating score.
Highest Rated
Stake
3.4 / 5 / 5
Category winners
Overall winner
Based on overall expert rating (3.4/5).
Better for beginners
Stronger onboarding and educational resources.
Lower trading costs
More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.
Stronger regulation
Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.
Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Our #1 Pick Right Now: AvaTrade
Same category, top-tier regulation, and it's currently accepting new traders.