Brokers Profile
Reviewed by Experts Updated 11/2/2026

Stake vs OCBC Securities: Which Broker Wins in 2026?

Stake and OCBC Securities both offer zero minimum deposits, but they serve very different types of investors. Our independent research gives Stake the edge overall with a 3.4/5 rating versus 3.3/5 for OCBC Securities, largely thanks to tier-1 regulation and a simpler fee structure.

OVERALL WINNER
S

Stake

3.4 / 5Score: 3 / 3

Commission-free share trading backed by tier-1 ASIC and FCA regulation.

Min deposit
$0
Max leverage
1:1
Spread from
0 pips
Regulators
ASIC, FCA
OS

OCBC Securities

3.3 / 5Score: 0 / 3

A legacy Singaporean broker offering multi-asset access through a trusted banking institution.

Min deposit
$0
Max leverage
1:5
Spread from
0 pips
Regulators
MAS

Our #1 Pick Right Now: AvaTrade

Same category, top-tier regulation, and it's currently accepting new traders.

See What Makes It Different
Overall Winner
Stake
Best for Beginners
Stake
Lowest Fees
Stake
Top Regulation
Stake

Side-by-side comparison

Core features compared head-to-head.

Feature
S
Stake
OS
OCBC Securities
Overview
Rating3.4 / 53.3 / 5
Founded20171986
HeadquartersSydney, AustraliaSingapore
RegulationASIC, FCAMAS
Fees & Limits
Min Deposit$0$0
Spreads From0 pips0 pips
CommissionNone$0.18/lot
Max Leverage1:11:5
Platforms & Markets
Trading PlatformsProprietary Web, Proprietary MobileProprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile, iOCBC
Markets OfferedStocksStocks, Etf, Indices, Forex

Trading & non-trading fees

Min Deposit

Stake

$0

OCBC Securities

$0

Spreads From

Stake

0 pips

OCBC Securities

0 pips

Commission

Stake

None

OCBC Securities

$0.18/lot

Deposit Fees

Stake

None

OCBC Securities

None

Withdrawal Fees

Stake

None

OCBC Securities

None

Pros & cons

S

Stake

Pros

  • Higher overall independent rating at 3.4 out of 5
  • Completely free of per-trade commissions
  • Backed by two respected tier-1 regulators for added safety
  • No minimum deposit makes it accessible to new investors
  • No hidden deposit or withdrawal fees
  • Simple, streamlined platform experience ideal for beginners

Cons

  • Limited to stock trading only, with no forex, ETF, or indices access
  • Leverage capped at 1:1, unsuitable for margin-focused strategies
  • Only two proprietary platforms, lacking third-party platform options
  • Shorter company track record compared to legacy institutions
  • No dedicated desktop platform beyond the web interface
OS

OCBC Securities

Pros

  • Wider market selection spanning stocks, ETFs, indices, and forex
  • Higher leverage ceiling of up to 1:5
  • Decades of operating history dating back to 1986
  • Three supported trading platforms for added flexibility
  • No minimum deposit required to open an account
  • No deposit or withdrawal fees charged

Cons

  • Commission of $0.18 per lot adds cost for frequent traders
  • Regulated by only a single regulatory body, MAS
  • Lower overall independent rating at 3.3 out of 5
  • No tier-1 licences from bodies like ASIC or FCA
  • Platform complexity may feel less beginner-friendly

Our expert verdict

Editor's verdict

Overall winner Stake
Lowest fees Stake
Best regulation Stake
Better for beginners Stake

Stake is our recommended pick in this comparison, scoring 3.44/5 versus OCBC Securities's 3.31/5. Stake holds more tier-1 licences (ASIC, FCA), offering stronger regulatory protection, no per-trade commissions, and a straightforward stock-trading experience ideal for cost-conscious investors. OCBC Securities remains a strong contender for traders who need broader market access across forex, indices, and ETFs, or who specifically value its decades-long Singapore heritage and higher leverage ceiling. For the majority of everyday traders, though, Stake delivers the stronger all-round package.

Regulation & Safety

Regulation is one of the clearest differentiators in this matchup. Stake is regulated by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and the UK's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), both considered tier-1 regulators with strict capital adequacy and client fund segregation rules.

OCBC Securities, by contrast, is overseen by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS). MAS is a highly respected regulator in its own right, and OCBC Securities benefits from being part of the OCBC Bank group, one of Southeast Asia's largest financial institutions.

That said, holding two tier-1 licences gives Stake a broader regulatory footprint, which matters if you're trading across multiple jurisdictions. Our scoring system awards Stake 3 out of 3 points on this criterion, while OCBC Securities scores 0 out of 3, reflecting the narrower single-jurisdiction coverage.

Fees, Spreads & Commissions

Both brokers advertise spreads starting from 0 pips, so on paper the entry-level pricing looks identical. The real difference emerges in commission structure: Stake charges no per-trade commission at all, making it straightforward for buy-and-hold stock investors.

OCBC Securities charges a commission of $0.18 per lot, which can add up for active traders executing frequent trades, particularly across forex or indices positions. Neither broker charges deposit or withdrawal fees, which is a welcome point of parity.

For cost-conscious investors focused purely on stock picking, Stake's commission-free model is simpler to budget around. Active multi-asset traders, however, may find OCBC Securities's fee structure justified by the extra markets on offer.

Account Minimums & Accessibility

Neither broker erects a deposit barrier to entry — both Stake and OCBC Securities allow you to open an account with $0 minimum deposit. This makes both platforms accessible to beginner investors who want to start small.

Where they diverge is leverage. Stake caps leverage at 1:1, reflecting its focus on straightforward share ownership without margin amplification. OCBC Securities offers leverage up to 1:5, giving more experienced traders room to size positions more aggressively, particularly in forex and indices.

Markets & Platform Technology

OCBC Securities offers a noticeably wider market selection, covering Stocks, ETFs, Indices, and Forex. Stake, on the other hand, is laser-focused on Stocks only, which suits investors who want a dedicated equities experience without distraction.

On the technology side, Stake offers a Proprietary Web platform and Proprietary Mobile app, both built for simplicity and ease of use. OCBC Securities supports three platforms — Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile, and its dedicated iOCBC app — giving traders more flexibility in how they access the markets.

If platform variety and multi-asset access are priorities, OCBC Securities has the edge. But for traders who value a clean, uncluttered stock-trading interface, Stake's narrower platform suite can feel more focused and less overwhelming.

Company Heritage & Track Record

OCBC Securities carries significant institutional weight, founded in 1986 and backed by OCBC Bank, one of the oldest and most established banking groups in Singapore and the broader Asia-Pacific region. This decades-long track record offers a sense of stability that newer platforms can't easily replicate.

Stake is a comparatively younger company, founded in 2017 and headquartered in Sydney, Australia. Despite its shorter history, Stake has built a reputation among retail investors for accessible, low-cost share trading backed by credible tier-1 regulation.

Ultimately, longevity isn't everything — regulatory strength and fee transparency matter just as much, if not more, to everyday investors choosing where to place their capital.

Our Verdict

When we weigh regulation, fees, and overall user value together, Stake comes out ahead with a 3.4/5 rating compared to OCBC Securities's 3.3/5. The combination of tier-1 regulatory coverage and a commission-free structure makes Stake the stronger all-round choice for most retail stock investors in 2026.

OCBC Securities still earns its place for traders who need broader asset class access, higher leverage, or simply prefer banking with an established Singaporean institution. Your ultimate choice should come down to whether you prioritize simplicity and regulation (Stake) or market breadth and heritage (OCBC Securities).

Verdict summary

The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.

Editor's verdict

Stake wins overall

Stake edges out OCBC Securities overall based on our expert rating score.

S

Highest Rated

Stake

3.4 / 5 / 5

Category winners

  • Overall winner

    Based on overall expert rating (3.4/5).

    Stake
  • Better for beginners

    Stronger onboarding and educational resources.

    Stake
  • Lower trading costs

    More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.

    Stake
  • Stronger regulation

    Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.

    Stake

Frequently asked questions

Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.

Our #1 Pick Right Now: AvaTrade

Same category, top-tier regulation, and it's currently accepting new traders.

See What Makes It Different
BP AI