Tiger Brokers
Ultra-low commissions backed by dual tier-1 regulation make Tiger Brokers the value leader for cost-conscious investors.
- Min deposit
- $0
- Max leverage
- 1:4
- Spread from
- 0 pips
- Regulators
- MAS, ASIC
Tiger Brokers and OCBC Securities are two established names serving Singapore-based investors, but they differ sharply on cost structure and regulatory footprint. Our independent research gives Tiger Brokers the edge with a 3.6/5 rating against OCBC Securities's 3.3/5. Below, we break down exactly why.
Ultra-low commissions backed by dual tier-1 regulation make Tiger Brokers the value leader for cost-conscious investors.
Four decades of banking heritage and the broadest market access make OCBC Securities a trusted all-rounder for diversified investors.
Same category, top-tier regulation, and it's currently accepting new traders.
See What Makes It DifferentCore features compared head-to-head.
| Feature | TB Tiger Brokers | OS OCBC Securities |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.6 / 5 | 3.3 / 5 |
| Founded | 2014 | 1986 |
| Headquarters | Singapore | Singapore |
| Regulation | MAS, ASIC | MAS |
| Fees & Limits | ||
| Min Deposit | $0 | $0 |
| Spreads From | 0 pips | 0 pips |
| Commission | $0.01/lot | $0.18/lot |
| Max Leverage | 1:4 | 1:5 |
| Platforms & Markets | ||
| Trading Platforms | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile, iOCBC |
| Markets Offered | Stocks, Indices, Cfd | Stocks, Etf, Indices, Forex |
Tiger Brokers
$0
OCBC Securities
$0
Tiger Brokers
0 pips
OCBC Securities
0 pips
Tiger Brokers
$0.01/lot
OCBC Securities
$0.18/lot
Tiger Brokers
None
OCBC Securities
None
Tiger Brokers
None
OCBC Securities
None
Tiger Brokers is our recommended pick in this comparison, scoring 3.6/5 versus OCBC Securities's 3.3/5 on our proprietary rating system. Tiger Brokers wins on regulatory depth (MAS and ASIC licensing), lower commission costs at $0.01/lot, and earns our top marks for beginners, low fees, regulation, and overall value. OCBC Securities remains a credible alternative for traders who specifically want forex market access or the iOCBC platform, and its 1986 founding date gives it a longer track record, but for most traders Tiger Brokers presents the stronger all-round package.
Regulatory oversight is one of the most important factors when choosing a broker, and this is where the gap between these two platforms is most pronounced. Tiger Brokers is regulated by both the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) and Australia's ASIC, giving traders protection across two tier-1 jurisdictions.
OCBC Securities, by contrast, is regulated solely by MAS. While MAS is a highly respected regulator in its own right, holding a single licence versus two gives Tiger Brokers a structural edge in our safety scoring, contributing directly to its higher overall rating.
For traders who prioritize multi-jurisdictional oversight and want added peace of mind, Tiger Brokers' dual regulatory status is a meaningful differentiator that shouldn't be overlooked.
Both brokers advertise spreads starting from 0 pips, so on paper this metric looks like a tie. The real differentiation emerges in commission structure, where Tiger Brokers charges just $0.01/lot compared to OCBC Securities's $0.18/lot.
Over time, especially for active or high-volume traders, this commission gap compounds significantly. A trader executing frequent trades through Tiger Brokers could save substantially compared to the same volume routed through OCBC Securities.
Neither broker charges deposit or withdrawal fees, which is a welcome consistency across both platforms and removes friction for funding or withdrawing capital.
Both brokers also offer a $0 minimum deposit, meaning cost of entry isn't a barrier with either option — the real cost differences show up in ongoing trading commissions.
OCBC Securities actually offers broader platform choice, supporting Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile, and its dedicated iOCBC app — three total platform options versus Tiger Brokers's two (Proprietary Web and Proprietary Mobile).
Market access also favors OCBC Securities on paper, with four asset classes available: Stocks, ETFs, Indices, and Forex. Tiger Brokers covers Stocks, Indices, and CFDs — three markets, notably missing dedicated Forex and ETF access.
Traders specifically seeking forex pairs or ETF products through a Singapore-based broker may find OCBC Securities's market breadth more aligned with their needs, despite Tiger Brokers's overall rating advantage.
OCBC Securities offers slightly higher maximum leverage at 1:5, compared to Tiger Brokers's 1:4. This is a modest difference, but for leveraged strategies it could matter to some traders.
Neither leverage cap is particularly aggressive compared to global offshore brokers, which reflects the more conservative regulatory environment both brokers operate under in Singapore.
Conservative leverage limits are generally a positive from a risk-management standpoint, especially for newer traders who are still developing position-sizing discipline.
OCBC Securities has a substantially longer operating history, founded in 1986, giving it four decades of market presence and institutional backing as part of the broader OCBC banking group.
Tiger Brokers is comparatively newer, founded in 2014, but has rapidly built a strong reputation particularly among younger, tech-savvy, and cost-conscious investors across Asia.
Both companies are headquartered in Singapore, so traders in the region benefit from local support and familiarity regardless of which platform they choose.
Weighing all factors together, Tiger Brokers earns the stronger overall rating of 3.6/5 against OCBC Securities's 3.3/5, driven primarily by superior regulatory coverage and meaningfully lower commission costs.
Tiger Brokers takes our awards for Best Overall, Best for Beginners, Best for Low Fees, and Best for Regulation — a clean sweep across our core evaluation categories.
That said, OCBC Securities isn't without merit. Its broader market selection, higher leverage ceiling, extra platform option, and 40-year heritage make it a legitimate choice for traders who specifically value those attributes over Tiger Brokers's cost and regulatory advantages.
The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.
Tiger Brokers edges out OCBC Securities overall based on our expert rating score.
Highest Rated
Tiger Brokers
3.6 / 5 / 5
Category winners
Overall winner
Based on overall expert rating (3.6/5).
Better for beginners
Stronger onboarding and educational resources.
Lower trading costs
More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.
Stronger regulation
Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.
Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.
Our #1 Pick Right Now: AvaTrade
Same category, top-tier regulation, and it's currently accepting new traders.