TB
Tiger Brokers
3.6 / 5Score: 1 / 2
Multi-asset access with near-zero commissions and tier-1 regulation across two major financial hubs.
- Min deposit
- $0
- Max leverage
- 1:4
- Spread from
- 0 pips
- Regulators
- MAS, ASIC
Reviewed by Experts Updated 11/2/2026
Tiger Brokers vs Stake: The Complete 2026 Broker Comparison
Tiger Brokers and Stake both target cost-conscious investors, but only one comes out on top in our independent rating. Tiger Brokers edges out Stake with a 3.6/5 score versus 3.4/5, thanks to broader market access and stronger regulatory coverage. Here's the full breakdown.
S
Stake
3.4 / 5Score: 1 / 2
Commission-free stock investing backed by ASIC and FCA regulation.
- Min deposit
- $0
- Max leverage
- 1:1
- Spread from
- 0 pips
- Regulators
- ASIC, FCA
Our #1 Pick Right Now: AvaTrade
Same category, top-tier regulation, and it's currently accepting new traders.
See What Makes It Different Overall Winner
Tiger Brokers
Best for Beginners
Tiger Brokers
Lowest Fees
Tiger Brokers
Top Regulation
Tiger Brokers
Side-by-side comparison
Core features compared head-to-head.
| Feature | TB Tiger Brokers | S Stake |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Rating | 3.6 / 5 | 3.4 / 5 |
| Founded | 2014 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Singapore | Sydney, Australia |
| Regulation | MAS, ASIC | ASIC, FCA |
| Fees & Limits | ||
| Min Deposit | $0 | $0 |
| Spreads From | 0 pips | 0 pips |
| Commission | $0.01/lot | None |
| Max Leverage | 1:4 | 1:1 |
| Platforms & Markets | ||
| Trading Platforms | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile | Proprietary Web, Proprietary Mobile |
| Markets Offered | Stocks, Indices, Cfd | Stocks |
Trading & non-trading fees
Min Deposit
Tiger Brokers
$0
Stake
$0
Spreads From
Tiger Brokers
0 pips
Stake
0 pips
Commission
Tiger Brokers
$0.01/lot
Stake
None
Deposit Fees
Tiger Brokers
None
Stake
None
Withdrawal Fees
Tiger Brokers
None
Stake
None
Pros & cons
TB
Tiger Brokers
Pros
- Higher overall rating of 3.6/5 in our independent assessment
- Broader market selection with three distinct asset classes
- Leverage up to 1:4 offers greater trading flexibility
- Established since 2014, giving it a longer operating history
- Dual tier-1 regulation from MAS and ASIC
- No minimum deposit required to open an account
- No deposit or withdrawal fees on funding transactions
Cons
- Commission of $0.01/lot, while minimal, is not entirely free like Stake
- Leverage of 1:4 is modest compared to some global CFD brokers
- Regulatory coverage is concentrated in Asia-Pacific rather than including a European or UK regulator
- Proprietary platform may require adjustment for traders used to MetaTrader or third-party tools
S
Stake
Pros
- No per-trade commission on stock purchases
- Straightforward, stock-only platform reduces complexity
- Regulated by two respected tier-1 authorities, ASIC and FCA
- No minimum deposit needed to start investing
- No deposit or withdrawal fees on account funding
- Sydney-based headquarters with strong regional presence
Cons
- Lower overall rating of 3.4/5 compared to Tiger Brokers
- Limited to Stocks only, with no Indices or CFD access
- No leverage available (1:1), restricting position sizing flexibility
- Shorter operating history, founded in 2017 versus Tiger Brokers' 2014
- Narrower market selection may not suit diversified traders
Our expert verdict
Editor's verdict
Overall winner Tiger Brokers
Lowest fees Tiger Brokers
Best regulation Tiger Brokers
Better for beginners Tiger Brokers
Tiger Brokers is our recommended pick, scoring 3.6/5 versus Stake's 3.4/5 on our independent rating system. Tiger Brokers wins on market variety, leverage availability, and regulatory breadth, while Stake remains a capable niche choice for commission-free stock-only investors who value its Sydney-based platform. For most traders seeking a well-rounded brokerage, Tiger Brokers offers the stronger overall package in 2026.
Regulation & Safety
Both brokers operate under credible tier-1 regulatory frameworks, giving traders a reasonable baseline of confidence when it comes to fund safety and operational oversight.
Tiger Brokers is regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) and Australia's ASIC, giving it a dual-jurisdiction footprint across Asia-Pacific. Stake, meanwhile, is overseen by ASIC and the UK's FCA, covering Australian and British markets.
Neither broker holds a clear numerical advantage in regulatory strength since both carry two respected tier-1 licences. However, Tiger Brokers' MAS oversight adds a layer of Asian market credibility that Stake does not match.
Fees, Spreads & Commissions
On the surface, both brokers advertise spreads starting from 0 pips, making this category closely matched at first glance. The real differentiator lies in commission structure.
Tiger Brokers charges a minimal $0.01/lot commission, an almost negligible cost for active traders who value transparency in pricing. Stake, on the other hand, charges no per-trade commission at all, which is a genuine cost advantage for buy-and-hold stock investors.
Both brokers charge $0 for deposits and withdrawals, so account funding and cash-out costs are a non-issue on either platform. Overall, Stake's zero-commission model is appealing for simple stock investing, but Tiger Brokers' near-zero fee combined with broader market access still delivers better overall value.
Minimum Deposit & Accessibility
Both Tiger Brokers and Stake require a $0 minimum deposit, making either platform accessible to beginners or traders testing the waters with minimal capital commitment.
This parity means new traders won't face a financial barrier to entry with either broker, and the decision instead comes down to feature set, market range, and platform experience rather than upfront cost.
Markets & Leverage
This is where Tiger Brokers pulls ahead significantly. Tiger Brokers offers access to Stocks, Indices, and CFDs, giving traders three distinct asset classes to diversify across, while Stake restricts users to Stocks only.
Leverage availability also favors Tiger Brokers, which offers up to 1:4, compared to Stake's 1:1 (no leverage). For traders who want the flexibility to size positions more aggressively or hedge across instruments, Tiger Brokers is the clear winner in this category.
Stake's narrower focus may still suit long-term equity investors who have no interest in leveraged products or CFDs and prefer a simplified, stock-only experience.
Trading Platforms & Technology
Both brokers rely on proprietary technology rather than third-party platforms like MetaTrader. Tiger Brokers and Stake each offer a Proprietary Web platform and a Proprietary Mobile app, so the raw platform lineup is identical on paper.
The real distinction comes down to how each proprietary suite is built for its respective market focus — Tiger Brokers' platform is engineered to handle multi-asset trading across stocks, indices, and CFDs, while Stake's app is streamlined specifically around stock investing.
Company Background & Track Record
Tiger Brokers was founded in 2014 and is headquartered in Singapore, giving it two extra years of operating history compared to Stake, which was founded in 2017 and is based in Sydney, Australia.
That longer track record, combined with its dual regulatory coverage and broader asset access, contributes to Tiger Brokers' stronger overall rating of 3.6/5 versus Stake's 3.4/5 in our independent assessment.
Verdict summary
The bottom line — category winners and our final pick based on ratings.
Editor's verdict
Tiger Brokers wins overall
Tiger Brokers edges out Stake overall based on our expert rating score.
TB
Highest Rated
Tiger Brokers
3.6 / 5 / 5
Category winners
Overall winner
Based on overall expert rating (3.6/5).
Tiger BrokersBetter for beginners
Stronger onboarding and educational resources.
Tiger BrokersLower trading costs
More competitive spreads and baseline commissions.
Tiger BrokersStronger regulation
Higher trust based on tier-1 regulatory oversight.
Tiger Brokers
Frequently asked questions
According to our independent rating system, Tiger Brokers scores 3.6/5 compared to Stake's 3.4/5. Tiger Brokers earns its edge through broader market access, higher leverage, and a longer operating history, though Stake remains competitive for stock-only, commission-free investing. Your ideal choice ultimately depends on whether you need multi-asset access or prefer a simplified stock platform.
Both brokers advertise spreads starting from 0 pips, but their commission models differ. Tiger Brokers charges a minimal $0.01/lot commission, while Stake charges no commission at all on stock trades. For pure stock investors focused on eliminating trade fees, Stake has a slight edge, though Tiger Brokers' cost remains negligible.
Neither broker requires a minimum deposit to get started. Tiger Brokers and Stake both allow account opening with $0, making them equally accessible for beginners or traders testing a new platform with limited capital.
Tiger Brokers is regulated by MAS and ASIC, while Stake is regulated by ASIC and FCA. Both maintain dual tier-1 regulatory coverage, so neither has a decisive safety advantage, though Tiger Brokers leans toward Asia-Pacific oversight and Stake toward UK/Australian coverage.
Both brokers offer a Proprietary Web platform and a Proprietary Mobile app rather than third-party software like MetaTrader. Tiger Brokers' platform is built to support multi-asset trading across stocks, indices, and CFDs, while Stake's app is designed specifically for streamlined stock investing.
No, only Tiger Brokers offers access to Stocks, Indices, and CFDs in one account. Stake is limited strictly to Stocks, making it a better fit for investors who don't require exposure to indices or leveraged CFD products.
Tiger Brokers offers leverage up to 1:4 on eligible instruments, giving traders more flexibility in position sizing. Stake offers no leverage, operating at a 1:1 ratio, which suits conservative investors who prefer to trade with their own capital only.
Yes, there is nothing preventing you from opening accounts with both brokers simultaneously. Many investors use multiple brokerages to diversify market access, take advantage of specific platform tools, or separate their leveraged trading from long-term stock holdings.
Tiger Brokers was founded in 2014 and is headquartered in Singapore, giving it a three-year head start over Stake, which was founded in 2017 and is based in Sydney, Australia. This longer track record contributes to Tiger Brokers' stronger overall rating in our assessment.
Neither broker charges deposit or withdrawal fees, meaning traders can fund and withdraw from their accounts without incurring extra transaction costs on either platform.
Risk warning: Trading CFDs and forex involves significant risk of loss and is not suitable for all investors. Please consider whether you understand how CFDs work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.